JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hartigan, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hartigan, P. M.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:1370-1371
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

The Use of a Bronchial Blocker To Rescue an Ill-Fitting Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube

Mauricio Nino, MD, Simon C. Body, MBChB, and Philip M. Hartigan, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Philip Hartigan, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 

Implications: Using certain specialized endotracheal tubes designed to allow single-lung ventilation for certain thoracic surgical procedures may be fraught with technical difficulties owing to common anatomic anomalies. This case report describes a simple solution for an ill-fitting right double-lumen endotracheal tube using a balloon-tipped catheter.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
Right-sided double lumen endotracheal tubes (DLTs) have well known advantages over alternative lung isolation techniques for certain patients undergoing left pneumonectomy (1). However, in patients who have a short right mainstem bronchus, the positioning of a right-sided DLT with the right upper lobe (RUL) fenestration aligned with the RUL bronchus may leave the bronchial cuff positioned high in the carina with inadequate contact surface area to accomplish an adequate seal (see Figure 1).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Normal bronchial anatomy and a properly fitted right-sided double-lumen tube. B, Anomalous short right mainstem bronchus reduces available contact surface area for bronchial cuff seal.

 

    Case Report
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
A 71-year-old male with left upper lobe adenocarcinoma was scheduled for a left pneumonectomy. The patient was 175 cm, 75 kg, with a Mallampati class I airway and otherwise unremarkable physical examination. Preoperatively, a right radial arterial line and a thoracic epidural catheter were inserted. After induction of anesthesia, the trachea was intubated via direct laryngoscopy with a 39F right DLT (Bronchopart®; Rüsch Inc., Duluth, GA). Auscultation suggested that the tube was correctly positioned in the right mainstem bronchus. Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy via the bronchial lumen was used to align the RUL fenestration with the RUL bronchus. Notably, withdrawal of the DLT by 1.5 cm was required to accomplish this alignment. After positioning the patient in right lateral decubitus position and fiberoptically confirming the DLT position, one-lung ventilation was initiated by clamping the tracheal lumen. A leak across the bronchial cuff was noticed and the left lung failed to collapse. Adequate inflation of the bronchial pilot balloon was confirmed and the fiberoptic bronchoscope was passed down the tracheal lumen to visualize the carina. The bronchial cuff was observed to be partially above the carina, failing to provide a satisfactory seal. Advancing the tube to gain more contact surface area resulted in occlusion of the RUL bronchus. An 8/22F bronchial blocker (Fogarty Occlusion Catheter model #62080822F, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Irvine, CA) was then placed through the tracheal lumen of the DLT with the blocker balloon positioned at the level of the carina. Measurement of the bronchial blocker against a clean DLT allowed us to blindly insert it to the desired depth (Figure 2A). The balloon was inflated with 5 cc of air, and the air leak and inflation of the left lung ceased (Figure 2B).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Bronchial blocker is premeasured against a clean double-lumen tube and marked for proper depth of insertion which will position the cuff just beyond the tracheal orifice. B, Bronchial blocker inserted via tracheal lumen to the premeasured depth completes the air seal. The bronchial balloon of the double-lumen tube is left inflated as it may contribute to the air seal, depending on the depth of insertion of the bronchial blocker. The tracheal balloon of the double-lumen tube may be deflated to prevent trapping air between the bronchial blocker and the tracheal cuff.

 
After surgery, bronchoscopy revealed that the RUL bronchus arose from the right mainstem bronchus 3 mm below the carina. The trachea was then extubated, and the patient recovered uneventfully.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
The average length of the adult right mainstem bronchus is 18 mm (1). Manufacturers have designed the position of the RUL fenestration in right DLTs in accordance with population averages (2). Of the major airway anomalies, however, the RUL orifice is the most frequent abnormality (3). Ten percent of patients have a right mainstem bronchus <10 mm in length (2,3). Approximately 0.4%–2% of patients have a RUL orifice arising at or above the level of the carina (2).

Ill-fitting DLTs may be a result of anatomic anomalies or improper size selection. No preoperative variable (including gender, age, height, and left mainstem bronchus diameter by chest radiograph or computed tomography) has proven to be a universally reliable guide to proper DLT size selection (4,5). Three-dimensional reconstruction of the tracheobronchial image from spiral computed tomography scans are reliable but not readily available (6). It has been estimated that as much as 10% of the adult population cannot be safely intubated with any right-sided DLT that is currently available (2,7).

Marginally ill-fitting right DLTs might not be recognized until the patient is positioned laterally. We describe a simple, effective solution to such situations, avoiding the need to extubate and reintubate a trachea with the patient in the lateral position.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Benumof JL. Anesthesia for thoracic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995:356.
  2. Benumof JL, Partridge BL, Salvatierra C, Keating J. Margin of safety in positioning modern double-lumen endotracheal tubes. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 729–38.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Atwell SW. Major anomalies of the tracheobronchial tree. Chest 1967; 52: 611–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hannallah MS, Benumof JL, Ruttimann UE. The relationship between left mainstem bronchial diameter and patient size. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995; 9: 119–21.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Brodsky JB, Macario A, Mark JB. Tracheal diameter predicts double-lumen tube size: a method for selecting left double-lumen tubes. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 861–4.[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Eberle B, Weiler N, Vogel N, et al. Computed tomography-based tracheobronchial image reconstruction allows selection of the individually appropriate double-lumen tube size. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 532–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Brodsky JB. Separation of the lungs. In: Cohen E, ed. The practice of thoracic anesthesia. 1st ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1995: 288.
Accepted for publication August 11, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. H. Wald, A. Mahajan, M. B. Kaplan, and J. B. Atkinson
Experience with the Arndt paediatric bronchial blocker
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 92 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. H. Campos
An Update on Bronchial Blockers During Lung Separation Techniques in Adults
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1266 - 1274.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hartigan, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hartigan, P. M.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press