JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gozal, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gozal, Y.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:1415-1419
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia in Cataract Surgery Patients: General Versus Local Anesthesia

Lucio Glantz, MD*, Benjamin Drenger, MD{dagger}, and Yaacov Gozal, MD{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel, {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital and The Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Yaacov Gozal, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients having cataract surgery are usually elderly and have risk factors for ischemic heart disease. We sought to determine the incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients having cataract surgery and compare the influence of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA). Eighty-one patients undergoing cataract surgery with at least two risk factors for ischemic heart disease were monitored continuously for 24 h by using electrocardiogram leads II and V5 and a Holter recorder (Medilog 4500, Oxford Ltd, UK). Patients were randomly allocated to two groups, either LA (n = 39) or GA (n = 42). In the LA group, a peribulbar block was performed, whereas a similar block was performed in the GA group after tracheal intubation. The study demonstrated that cataract patients suffered from a frequent incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia (31%). There was no difference in the incidence rate between the groups: 12 of 39 in the LA group and 13 of 42 in the GA group (P = NS). However, the number of ischemic episodes was significantly increased in the GA group (18 vs 13 in the LA group) (P < 0.05), and there were significantly more intraoperatively in the GA group (8 vs 1) (P < 0.01). All intraoperative ischemic events were associated with tachycardia (>=20% of baseline), whereas postoperative ischemic changes were mostly independent of heart rate. Only one of the ischemic patients (in the GA group) was admitted as a result of intractable chest pain. There were significantly less intraoperative episodes in the LA group, suggesting that LA may be safer than GA in patients during this type of surgery.

Implications: In patients with risk factors for ischemic heart disease, cataract surgery occurs in 30% of the cases with ischemic events of short duration. There were significantly less intraoperative episodes in the local anesthesia group, suggesting that local anesthesia may be safer than general anesthesia in patients during this type of surgery.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients undergoing cataract surgery tend to be a high-risk group for ischemic heart disease because of the prevalence of risk factors, such as advanced age, atherosclerosis, hypertension, and diabetes. Perioperative cardiac complications are an additional risk factor in these patients during noncardiac surgery (13). Nevertheless, adult patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery are considered at low risk for perioperative cardiac events despite an increased prevalence of coexisting diseases (4).

We have shown that retinal surgery performed under local anesthesia is accompanied by a frequent incidence of postoperative myocardial ischemia (27%) (5). Cataract surgery is performed under either local or general anesthesia, mostly based on the surgeon’s preference and the patient’s cooperation. Little is known about cardiac ischemia in ophthalmic surgery under general anesthesia, and no prospective study has been performed to compare cardiac morbidity with general and local anesthesia.

This prospective study was designed to compare the incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia in elderly patients undergoing cataract surgery under general or local anesthesia.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Eighty-eight consecutive patients, ASA physical status II-III, 60 or more yr old, with known ischemic heart disease or having at least two risk factors for coronary artery disease (atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking), and scheduled for elective cataract surgery were enrolled for this study. IRB approval was obtained and patients gave informed consent to participate in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups, local anesthesia (LA) or general anesthesia (GA), according to a computer-generated random number schedule. When the type of anesthesia selected was not randomized (lack of patient consent for one of the anesthetic modalities, presence of Parkinson’s disease, or uncooperative patient requiring GA), patients were excluded from the study. Patients were also excluded when the preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) did not permit ST segment analysis: presence of dysrhythmias or bundle-branch block.

A 12-lead ECG was recorded before surgery and 24 h postoperatively. Myocardial ischemia was assessed by a two-channel AM Holter recorder (Medilog 4500, Oxford Ltd, UK). Two bipolar leads (modified L2 and V5) were used. The recording started 60 min before anesthesia and continued for 24 h. The patients stayed overnight in the hospital, regardless of the type of anesthesia as is the usual practice, to allow an ophthalmologic examination the next morning. Holter tapes were analyzed by two independent investigators blinded as to patient identity, type of anesthesia, and clinical course.

Ischemia was defined as reversible ST segment changes lasting >=1 min and involving a shift from baseline (adjusted for positional changes) of either >=0.1 mV ST depression measured 60 ms after the J point, unless that point occurred within the T wave, in which case it was measured >=40 ms after the J point, or ST increase >=0.2 mV at the J point. The baseline level of the ST segment was defined as its position during a stable period (usually 15–30 min) preceding each episode of change. The reversibility of an ischemic episode was defined by the return of the ST segment to the baseline for >=1 min.

Twelve-month postoperative patient contact by telephone was made by an observer who was unaware of the Holter analysis results. Patients or their families were asked about new cardiac events and/or change in cardiac medications.

LA (retrobulbar block) was performed by the ophthalmologist in the operating room under sedation with IV midazolam (1–3 mg) by using a mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 4% (3 mL each). GA was induced with thiopental, fentanyl, and vecuronium and maintained with nitrous oxide and isoflurane in oxygen. Additional fentanyl was given as needed. After securing the endotracheal tube, a retrobulbar block was performed by the surgeon to decrease anesthetic requirement and to facilitate postoperative analgesia.

Patients in both groups stayed 2 h in the postanesthesia care unit for closer monitoring, including continuous oxygen saturation recording, and noninvasive blood pressure recording (every 5 min). Afterwards, the patients were sent to the ward where these variables were checked once every shift.

Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical comparisons were made with Student’s t-test and two-way analysis of variance where appropriate. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Eighty-one patients participated in the final data set. Five patients in the LA group were excluded (three uncooperative patients needed GA, and two had a preoperative ECG with a left bundle-branch block), whereas two patients in the GA group were excluded because of the presence of a bundle-branch block in the preoperative ECG.

Demographic data are presented in Table 1. There was no difference between the two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Demographics
 
When compared with preanesthetic values, there was a significant increase in heart rate during surgery in both groups, from 67.8 ± 8 to 89.2 ± 13 bpm in the LA group and from 67.4 ± 11 to 91.9 ± 12 bpm in the GA group, with no statistical difference between the two groups.

Systolic blood pressure has decreased significantly during GA, from 146.1 ± 12 to 102.4 ± 13 mm Hg. In the LA group, however, there was an increase in blood pressure during surgery (from 139.9 ± 11 to 160.0 ± 17 mm Hg).

No myocardial ischemia was recorded before surgery. A frequent incidence of intra- and/or postoperative myocardial ischemia was noted in both groups: in 12 of 39 patients (31%) in the LA group and in 13 of 42 (31%) in the GA group (P = NS). The characteristics of the ischemic events are presented in Tables 2 and 3. In all patients, myocardial ischemia was expressed as an ST depression. Both groups were also similar in the duration of the ischemic events, 18.1 ± 4.9 min in the LA group and 16.1 ± 2.9 min in the GA group, P = NS. The difference between the groups was in the timing of the ischemic events and in their number. In the GA group, the number of ischemic events was significantly increased: 18 vs 13 in the LA group (P < 0.05), and 8 of 13 GA patients, the ischemic events occurred during the operation, compared with only one patient of 12 in the LA group (P < 0.01). All intraoperative events were associated with an increase in heart rate (defined as increase >=20% of baseline), whereas the postoperative ischemic changes were independent of changes in heart rate in 10 of 22 patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characteristics of Ischemic Patients
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Intraoperative and Postoperative Ischemic Events
 
Only one patient presented prolonged significant postoperative symptomatic ischemia (GA group) in the ophthalmology ward, which did not improve with sublingual nitroglycerine. He was subsequently transferred to the coronary care unit, where the ischemia resolved with IV nitroglycerine and heparin infusion, and the patient was discharged home 3 days later. He refused cardiac catheterization. All other patients were discharged 24 h after surgery.

No contributing factor leading to ischemia was found. No difference in demographic (type of risk factors or current medications) or hemodynamic (heart rate change) variables were demonstrated in patients with and without ischemia.

In a 12-mo follow-up, only 33% of the patients or their families could be reached or were willing to participate. Of the 27 interviewed, 2 patients (1 in the GA group and 1 in the LA group) described a new cardiac event. One of the patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery as a result of unstable angina 9 mo after the cataract surgery and in the other, cardiac catheterization with balloon angioplasty was performed 8 mo after surgery. No death related to a cardiac event was reported in this 12-mo period. Patients did not report cardiac-originated symptoms in the immediate postoperative home recovery.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Most ophthalmic procedures in adult patients are performed under LA. The patient’s systemic diseases and their interference with the procedure often influence whether or not to perform cataract surgery under GA.

Only a few studies have evaluated the mortality and morbidity associated with ophthalmic surgery (68). In a retrospective study, Badrinath et al. (6) concluded that both LA and GA were associated with similar mortality after ophthalmic surgery. However, they did not consider myocardial ischemia as a risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Barker et al. (7) compared postoperative symptoms such as pain, nausea, and vomiting in patients undergoing cataract surgery using either GA or LA. Schein et al. (8), in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study have shown that routine preoperative testing does not reduce the risk of adverse perioperative events in patients undergoing cataract surgery. However, in this study, myocardial ischemia was defined as new or more severe chest pain. It is possible that they missed many of the ischemic events because perioperative myocardial ischemia is virtually always silent. We have shown, in a previous study (5), that retinal surgery with LA was accompanied by a frequent incidence (27%) of postoperative myocardial ischemia. However, perioperative myocardial ischemia related to cataract surgery has not been investigated prospectively. Our present study agrees with our previous one and has also demonstrated a 30% incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing cataract surgery under either LA or GA.

Hemodynamic instability associated with GA is alleged to be one of the advantages of using LA. Barker et al. (9) have shown in a study involving 20 elderly cataract patients that heart rate increased significantly after the induction of GA compared with LA. Mean arterial blood pressure increased significantly in both groups after the induction of anesthesia, but decreased to lower than control values in the GA group during the rest of the study, whereas it remained moderately increased (10 mm Hg higher than control values) in the LA group. LA, in the same study, prevented the small increase in epinephrine, norepinephrine secretion, and glucose plasma level seen in the GA group. In addition, the same investigators have demonstrated the absence of excessive release of cortisol in the LA group compared with a significant increase (from 407 nmol/L to 801 nmol/L) in the GA group (10). In surgical patients, the hemodynamic changes strongly associated with myocardial ischemia are tachycardia (11) and relative hypotension (12) leading to an imbalance between myocardial oxygen demand and delivery and to myocardial ischemia. In the present study, eight patients in the GA group and only one in the LA group presented with intraoperative myocardial ischemia. This finding is consistent with our previous study (5), in which no case of intraoperative myocardial ischemia during retinal surgery was observed under LA. In the present study, intraoperative ischemia was invariably found in patients during GA with tachycardia and hypotension. However, patients using LA were hemodynamically stable, except for a few minutes of transient hypertension when the block was performed.

Postoperative ischemia was related to tachycardia in only 54.7% of the patients, approximately nine hours after surgery in both groups. This was probably related to pain resulting from the fading of the ocular block. Late postoperative ischemic episodes were not associated with tachycardia. These events may be explained by an increase in catecholamine levels that results metabolically in increased cholesterol and free fatty acids, and increased platelet aggregation leading to a reduction in myocardial oxygen supply (13).

As described in previous articles (1,5,12), only ST segment depression was present; no case of ST segment increase was recorded. Ischemic episodes were asymptomatic and of short duration, except for one patient in whom proper treatment in the intensive care unit during the "therapeutic window" (12) probably prevented development of a more serious cardiac event.

The major limitations of the study design are the following: 1) a relatively small sample size, which limits the interpretation of the results regarding the effects of GA versus LA on postoperative myocardial ischemia. However, intraoperatively, the difference was statistically significant and may influence an ophthalmologist’s choice of anesthesia; 2) differences in outcome were not noted because it was not an aim of this study (ECGs were not recorded daily in the first week postoperativeley, and cardiac enzymes (creatine phosphokinase-MB, Troponin I) were not checked; and 3) the poor one-year follow-up rate (only 33% of the patients) was obviously not sufficiently reliable. The population studied was a relatively low socioeconomic class and/or an immigrant population. These patients left the country, moved to a different city, or were not willing to give us any information. A much larger-scale prospective, randomized study is warranted to determine whether LA or GA may change the rate of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death after cataract surgery.

In summary, cataract surgery in elderly patients with risk factors for coronary artery disease or ischemic heart disease is associated with ischemic events of short duration in approximately one-third of patients. These ischemic episodes were frequent during this type of surgery using GA, and occurred equally during the procedure and in the postoperative phase. In patients undergoing the cataract surgery using LA, ischemic episodes occurred mainly in the postoperative period.


    Footnotes
 
Presented, in part, at the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, 21st Annual Meeting, Chicago, 1999 and the 18th International Congress of the Israel Society of Anesthesiologists, Haifa, Israel, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Mangano DT, Browner WS, Hollenberg M, et al. Association of perioperative myocardial ischemia with cardiac morbidity and mortality in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 1781–8.[Abstract]
  2. Mangano DT. Perioperative cardiac morbidity. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 153–84.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Mangano DT, Browner WS, Hollenberg M, et al. Long term cardiac prognosis following noncardiac surgery. JAMA 1992; 268: 233–9.[Abstract]
  4. Eagle KA, Brundage BH, Chaitman BR, et al. Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery: report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Committee on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery. Circulation 1996; 93: 1278–317.
  5. Gozal Y, Drenger B, Robertson J, Davis R. ST segment changes following retinal surgery. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10: 297–301.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Badrinath SS, Bhaskaran S, Sundararaj I, et al. Mortality and morbidity associated with ophthalmic surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1995; 26: 535–41.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Barker JP, Vafidis GC, Hall GM. Postoperative morbidity following cataract surgery: a comparison of local and general anesthesia. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 435–7.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Schein OD, Katz J, Bass EB, et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 168–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Barker JP, Vafidis GC, Robinson PN, Hall GM. Plasma catecholamine response to cataract surgery: a comparison between general and local anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 642–5.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Barker JP, Robinson PN, Vafidis GC. Local analgesia prevents the cortisol and glycaemic responses to cataract surgery. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 442–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Dodds TM, Stone JG, Coromilas J. Prophylactic nitroglycerine infusion during noncardiac surgery dose not reduce perioperative ischemia. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 705–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Landesberg G, Luria MH, Cotev S, et al. Importance of long duration intraoperative ST segment depression in cardiac morbidity after vascular surgery. Lancet 1993; 341: 715–9.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Frank C, Smith S. Stress and the heart: biobehavioral aspects of sudden cardiac death. Psychosomatics 1990; 31: 255–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Accepted for publication August 7, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. MacPherson
Structured assessment tool to evaluate patient suitability for cataract surgery under local anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 521 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. Glantz, T. Ezri, Y. Cohen, S. Konichezky, A. Caspi, D. Geva, and A. Leviav
Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia in Patients Undergoing Sternectomy Shortly After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1566 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
F. Jin and F. Chung
Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2001; 87(4): 608 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. Dhingra, Y. Gozal, B. Drenger, and L. Glantz
Myocardial Ischemia in Cataract Surgery Patients
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2001; 93(2): 518 - 518.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
T. Y. Wong
Regular review: Effect of increasing age on cataract surgery outcomes in very elderly patients
BMJ, May 5, 2001; 322(7294): 1104 - 1106.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gozal, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gozal, Y.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press