JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, S.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Liaw, W.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, S.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Liaw, W.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;92:745-748
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE

Dexamethasone for Preventing Nausea and Vomiting Associated with Epidural Morphine: A Dose-Ranging Study

Shung-Tai Ho, MD, MS*, Jhi-Joung Wang, MD, DMSc*{ddagger}, Jann-Inn Tzeng, MD§, Hang-Seng Liu, MD{dagger}, Luo-Ping Ger, RN, MPH*, and Wen-Jinn Liaw, MD, DMSc*

Departments of *Anesthesiology and {dagger}Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei; {ddagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan; and §Department of Anesthesiology, Municipal Women’s and Children’s General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Shung-Tai Ho, MD, MS, Department of Anesthesiology, National Defense Medical Center, Rm. 8113, No. 161, Sec. 6, Minchuan E Rd., Taipei, Taiwan. Address e-mail to painlab{at}tpts5.seed.net.tw


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We conducted a dose-ranging study of dexamethasone for preventing nausea and vomiting within the first 24 h after the administration of epidural morphine. Two hundred twenty-five women (n = 45 in each of the five groups) undergoing simple abdominal total hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. When the incision closure was completed, patients received IV dexamethasone, 10 mg, 5 mg, or 2.5 mg; IV droperidol 1.25 mg; or saline 2 mL. All patients received epidural morphine 3 mg for postoperative analgesia. We found that patients who received dexamethasone 5 mg or 10 mg or droperidol 1.25 mg were significantly different from those who received saline alone in the following variables: the total incidence of nausea and vomiting, the incidence of more than four vomiting episodes, the number of patients requiring rescue antiemetics, the total number of patients with no vomiting and/or no antiemetic medication (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01). The differences among dexamethasone 10 mg and 5 mg and droperidol 1.25 mg were not significant. Dexamethasone 2.5 mg was ineffective. In conclusion, because dexamethasone 5 mg was as effective as 10 mg as an antiemetic, we recommend the smaller dose for preventing nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine.

Implications: We conducted a dose-ranging study of dexamethasone for preventing nausea and vomiting within the first 24 h after the administration of epidural morphine. We found that dexamethasone 5 mg was as effective as 10 mg. We recommend the smaller dose for this purpose.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Epidural morphine has been widely used for postoperative pain control (15). Although it provides excellent analgesia, nausea and vomiting occur frequently (30%–65%) (48). Among the antiemetics currently used, serotonin subtype 3 (5-HT3) antagonists (e.g., ondansetron, granisetron) are very effective on both nausea and vomiting, but they are expensive (911). Other currently used, lower-cost antiemetics (e.g., anticholinergics, dopamine receptor antagonists, antihistamines) have side effects (e.g., sedation, dry mouth, restlessness, changes in blood pressure, and extrapyramidal symptoms) (1214).

Dexamethasone is an effective antiemetic agent with minimum side effects after a single-dose administration (1520). Its antiemetic effect is equal to or better than other antiemetics, such as metoclopramide, perphenazine, droperidol, and ondansetron (8,15,17,20). Many investigators suggest the use of dexamethasone as a prophylactic antiemetic agent for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients recovering from general anesthesia (1520). The commonly used doses are 8 to 10 mg. Recently, dexamethasone 8 mg was also found to be effective in preventing nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine (7,8); nevertheless, a dose-ranging study of dexamethasone for this purpose has not been determined. We, therefore, performed a randomized and double-blinded study to evaluate three doses of dexamethasone (10 mg, 5 mg, and 2.5 mg) compared with droperidol (1.25 mg) and saline, in preventing epidural morphine-related nausea and vomiting. The effect of dexamethasone on the analgesic efficacy of epidural morphine 3 mg was also evaluated.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The protocol was approved by the Hospital Committee for Human Investigation and previous informed consent was obtained from each patient. Two hundred twenty-five patients, ASA physical status I or II, 35–55 yr old, who were approved to receive epidural anesthesia for simple abdominal hysterectomy (with/without oophorectomy) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. Patients with a history of postoperative nausea and vomiting, motion sickness or gastrointestinal disorders, or who had received an antiemetic within 48 h before surgery were excluded. Before the study, patients provided detailed medical histories and demographic information, including age, weight, height, time of last menstrual cycle, and drug consumption. All operations took place between 8:00 AM and 2:00 PM. Surgical anesthesia to the T6 dermatome level was provided by 0.3 mL/kg lidocaine 2% (with 1:100,000 epinephrine) followed by intermittent injections of 3 mL of lidocaine 2% (with epinephrine) as necessary through an epidural catheter in the L3-4 or L4-5 interspace. During surgery, 2.5–5 mg midazolam IV was given for sedation; no supplemental analgesic was given.

When the incision closure was completed, patients were randomly assigned to one of five groups of 45 patients to receive IV dexamethasone, at doses of 10 mg, 5 mg, or 2.5 mg; IV droperidol 1.25 mg; or saline 2 mL. The drug for injection was prepared as 2 mL of clear solution in identical syringes. One minute after the IV injection of the medication, all patients received 3 mg of preservative-free morphine in 10 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution through the epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia. The epidural catheters were aspirated before the injection of morphine to eliminate the possibility of catheter failure. Patients, anesthetists, and investigators who collected the postoperative data were blinded to the identity of the study drug.

Postoperatively, patients were observed for 24 h. A team of specially trained nurse anesthetists collected the postoperative data. During the observation period, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate were monitored every 4 h except when patients were sleeping.

Nausea and vomiting was evaluated by using the following variables: the incidences of nausea and vomiting, the number of episodes of vomiting, rescue antiemetics, and the total number of patients with no vomiting and/or no antiemetic medication. Nausea was defined as the subjectively unpleasant sensation associated with awareness of the urge to vomit. It was assessed while patients were lying still. Vomiting was defined as the forceful expulsion of gastric content from the mouth. For the purpose of data collection, retching (the same as vomiting but without expulsion of gastric content) was considered vomiting. A vomiting episode was defined as the events of vomiting that occurred in a rapid sequence (<1 min between events). If events of vomiting were separated by more than 1 min, they were considered to be separate episodes. Vomiting which occurred more than 4 times within 24 h was considered as severe vomiting. Rescue antiemetics (IV ondansetron 4 mg) were given if vomiting occurred, or at the patient’s complaint of intolerable nausea. The treatment was repeated if necessary. The complete response was defined as no vomiting and no antiemetic medication during a 24-h postoperative period, and this was also the primary efficacy end point of the study.

Postoperative wound pain at rest was assessed with a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS; 0= no pain to 10= most severe pain) score. When patients complained of "excessive" pain and requested analgesia, IM diclofenac 75 mg (every 12 h) was given.

The postoperative data (e.g., nausea, vomiting, and pain) were collected every 4 h (between 8:00 AM and 10:00 PM) by direct questioning by a team of specially trained nurse anesthetists or by patient complaint.

The occurrence of side effects accompanying dexamethasone usage, such as wound infections or delayed wound healing, was evaluated and reported by the surgeon. The duration of the hospital stay was recorded. Restlessness, a common droperidol-related side effect, was also evaluated (12). Restlessness was defined as a sensation of nervousness with an inability to keep still and was treated with IM diphenhydramine 20 mg (12).

Sample size was predetermined by using a power analysis based on the assumptions that (a) the total incidence of nausea and vomiting in the Saline group would be 60% (7), (b) a 40% reduction in the total incidence of nausea and vomiting (from 60% to 36%) in the Treatment group would be of clinical relevance, and (c) {alpha} = 0.05, ß = 0.2 (21). The analysis showed that 40 patients per group would be sufficient to detect the antiemetic effect a small dose of dexamethasone (2.5 mg). A series of one-way analyses of variance were conducted to examine differences among the five groups with respect to parametric variables. If a significant difference was found, the Bonferroni t-test was used to detect the intergroup differences. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine differences among the five groups with respect to nonparametric variables, followed by the Mann-Whitney ranked sum test for intergroup differences. Categorical variables were analyzed by using a series of 5x2 {chi}2 tests to determine differences among the five groups, followed by 2x2 {chi}2 tests or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate, for intergroup differences. All follow-up analyses were corrected for the number of simultaneous contrasts by using the Bonferroni adjustments. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Of the 225 patients enrolled in the study, 11 were withdrawn for one of the following reasons: failure of the epidural catheterization during surgery (n = 8) or incomplete data collection (n = 3). Therefore, 214 patients completed the trial. There were no differences among groups with respect to age, weight, height, last menstrual cycle, types of surgery, duration of surgery, total lidocaine administered, and total midazolam administered ( Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Demographics and Operative Characteristics
 
The postoperative VAS pain scores and the percentage of patients requiring rescue analgesic (diclofenac) are reported in Table 2. All patients reported low VAS pain scores, and the differences among groups were not significant. The percentage of patients requiring rescue analgesic among groups was also not different.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Postoperative Wound Pain at Rest (VAS Scores) and Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Analgesic
 
Table 3 demonstrates the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Patients who received dexamethasone 10 mg or 5 mg or droperidol 1.25 mg were different from those who received saline alone in the following variables: the total incidence of nausea and vomiting, incidence of more than four vomiting episodes, the percentage of patients requiring rescue antiemetics, and the incidence of complete responses (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01). The difference among dexamethasone 10 mg and 5 mg and droperidol 1.25 mg was not significant. Dexamethasone 2.5 mg provided no greater nausea/vomiting protection than saline alone.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. The Evaluation of Nausea and Vomiting Associated with Epidural Morphine
 
There were no reported wound infections or delayed wound healing. Six patients (14%) in the Droperidol group reported restlessness, which was more than the other groups (P < 0.05).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We evaluated the antiemetic effects of various doses of dexamethasone. We found that dexamethasone 10 mg and 5 mg were more effective than saline control for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine. Dexamethasone 2.5 mg was ineffective. Because dexamethasone 5 mg was as effective as 10 mg, we recommend the smaller dose for preventing nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine.

We also found that dexamethasone did not influence the efficacy of epidural morphine-related analgesia. Patients who received dexamethasone 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg requested similar amounts of rescue analgesic and reported similar intensities of postoperative pain.

Droperidol, a potent antiemetic, has demonstrated an antiemetic effect equal to ondansetron and superior to metoclopramide for preventing nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia (22,23). The recommended dose for this purpose is 1.25 mg (23). We found that droperidol 1.25 mg was also effective in preventing nausea and vomiting after epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. However, restlessness, a common droperidol-related side effect, was found in 14% of the patients. Although this side effect was relieved by the IM administration of diphenhydramine, it nevertheless produced mental distress in our patients.

The long-term administration of corticosteroids causes side effects, such as an increased risk of infection, glucose intolerance, delayed wound healing, superficial ulceration of gastric mucosa, and adrenal suppression (13). However, these side effects are not seen with a single dose of dexamethasone (1520). In the current study, no side effects were noted with a single dose of dexamethasone 2.5 to 10 mg (e.g., wound infection or delayed wound healing).

In conclusion, IV dexamethasone 5 mg was as effective as dexamethasone 10 mg and droperidol 1.25 mg, and was more effective than saline control in preventing epidural morphine-related nausea and vomiting. Dexamethasone 2.5 mg was ineffective. Because dexamethasone 5 mg was as effective as 10 mg as an antiemetic, we recommend the smaller dose for preventing nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cousins MJ, Mather LE. Intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids. Anesthesiology 1984; 61: 276–310.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Kundra P, Gurnani A, Bhattacharya A. Preemptive epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief after lumbar laminectomy. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 135–8.[Abstract]
  3. Zakowski MJ, Ramanathan S, Turndorf H. A two-dose epidural morphine regimen for cesarean section patients: therapeutic efficacy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36: 698–701.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Fuller JG, McMorland GH, Douglas MJ, Palmer L. Epidural morphine for analgesia after cesarean section: a report of 4880 patients. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37: 636–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Stenseth R, Sellevold O, Breivik H. Epidural morphine for postoperative pain: experience with 1085 patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1985; 29: 148–56.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Chaney MA. Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 891–903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Wang JJ, Ho ST, Liu YH, et al. Dexamethasone decreases epidural morphine-related nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 117–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Tzeng JI, Wang JJ, Ho ST, et al. Dexamethasone on the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting after epidural morphine for post-cesarean section analgesia: a comparison of droperidol with saline. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 1–4.[Free Full Text]
  9. Fujii Y, Saiton Y, Tanaka H, Toyooka H. Granisetron/dexamethasone combination for reducing nausea and vomiting during and after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1346–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. López-Olaondo LL, Carrascosa F, Pueyo FJ, et al. Combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 835–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Fujii Y, Saiton Y, Tanaka H. Prophylactic antiemetic therapy with granisetron in women undergoing thyroidectomy. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 526–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, Garcia-Ruiz PJ, Molina JA. Drug-induced movement disorder. Drug Safety 1997; 16: 180–204.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Brunton LL. Drugs affecting gastrointestinal function. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Molinoff PB, et al., eds. Goodman and Gillman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996: 899–936.
  14. Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: its etiology, treatment and prevention. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 162–84.[ISI][Medline]
  15. Wang JJ, Ho ST, Lee SC, et al. The prophylactic effect of dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing thyroidectomy: a comparison of droperidol with saline. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 200–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Splinter WM, Robert DJ. Dexamethasone decreases vomiting by children after tonsillectomy. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 913–6.[Abstract]
  17. Splinter WM, Robert DJ. Prophylaxis for vomiting by children after tonsillectomy: dexamethasone versus perphenazine. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 534–7.[Abstract]
  18. Wang JJ, Ho ST, Liu YH, et al. Dexamethasone reduces nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 772–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Toyooka H. The effects of dexamethasone on antiemetics in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 913–7.[Abstract]
  20. Henzi I, Walder B, Tramér M. Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systemic review. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 186–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lerman J. Study design in clinical research: sample size estimation and power analysis. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 184–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sniadach MS, Alberts MS. A comparison of the prophylactic antiemetic effect of ondansetron and droperidol on patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 797–800.[Abstract]
  23. Pandit SK, Kothary SP, Pandit UA, et al. Dose-response study of droperidol and metoclopramide as antiemetics for outpatient anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 798–802.[Free Full Text]
Accepted for publication November 15, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. P. Rathmell, T. R. Lair, and B. Nauman
The Role of Intrathecal Drugs in the Treatment of Acute Pain
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S30 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. Golembiewski, E. Chernin, and T. Chopra
Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 15, 2005; 62(12): 1247 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
F. Yanagidate and S. Dohi
Epidural oxycodone or morphine following gynaecological surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2004; 93(3): 362 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J.-I. Tzeng, K.-S. Chu, S.-T. Ho, K.-I Cheng, K.-S. Liu, and J.-J. Wang
Prophylactic iv ondansetron reduces nausea, vomiting and pruritus following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control: [L'administration prophylactique d'ondansetron iv reduit les nausees, les vomissements et le prurit qui suivent l'administration peridurale de morphine analgesique postoperatoire]
Can J Anesth, December 1, 2003; 50(10): 1023 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Duale, C. Frey, F. Bolandard, A. Barriere, and P. Schoeffler
Epidural versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2003; 91(5): 690 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S.-A. Nortcliffe, J. Shah, and D. J. Buggy
Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after spinal morphine for Caesarean section: comparison of cyclizine, dexamethasone and placebo
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2003; 90(5): 665 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
Y. Lee, H.-Y. Lai, P.-C. Lin, S.-J. Huang, and Y.-S. Lin
Dexamethasone prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting more effectively in women with motion sickness: [La dexamethasone previent plus efficacement les nausees et les vomissements postoperatoires chez les femmes atteintes du mal des transports]
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2003; 50(3): 232 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. J. Sanchez-Ledesma, L. Lopez-Olaondo, F. J. Pueyo, F. Carrascosa, and A. Ortega
A Comparison of Three Antiemetic Combinations for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1590 - 1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-J. Wang, J.-I. Tzeng, S.-T. Ho, J.-Y. Chen, C.-C. Chu, and E. C. So
The Prophylactic Effect of Tropisetron on Epidural Morphine-Related Nausea and Vomiting: A Comparison of Dexamethasone with Saline
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 749 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, S.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Liaw, W.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, S.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Liaw, W.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press