| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||

Departments of *Anesthesia and
Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Basel/Kantonsspital, Basel, Switzerland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Manfred Seeberger, MD, Department of Anesthesia, University of Basel, Kantonsspital, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. Address e-mail to mseeberger{at}uhbs.ch
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case Report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
General anesthesia was induced, and the patients trachea was intubated with an 8.5-mm inner diameter, low-pressure, high-volume cuff tube. Central venous access was achieved by cannulation of the right internal jugular vein. Blind insertion of a slightly smaller TEE probe (6.2/5.0 TEE probe; Hewlett Packard, Andover, MA) than had been previously used was attempted but was unsuccessful. Laryngoscopy allowed visualization of the larynx, but insertion of the TEE probe into the esophagus was stopped after 1 cm by a hard resistance. The echocardiographers impression was that the probe was stuck between the anterior thyroid and cricoid cartilages and the posterior vertebra of the extremely lean patient. Several ways of repositioning the patients head and neck did not resolve the problem, and the intention to monitor by TEE had to be abandoned again.
The same surgeon performed the second uneventful surgical procedure, and the same technique was used for preparation of the heart and for myocardial protection (cold cardioplegia without local cooling). After extubation in the intensive care unit, the sufficiently breathing patient complained about hoarseness. A laryngeal examination revealed palsy of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve without any other pathology. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and hoarseness resolved by themselves on the eighth postoperative day.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After crossing the aortic arch, the left laryngeal nerve reaches the groove between the esophagus and trachea. At this site, the nerve can be damaged by a needle used for cannulation of the internal jugular vein (810), by a displaced (1) or excessively inflated cuff (11), or by pressure applied during difficult gastric tube insertion (12). All these mechanisms are unlikely in our patient because the right internal jugular vein was cannulated, a high-volume, low-pressure cuff tube was used, the cuff pressure was monitored during and after the operation and kept <20 mm Hg, and there were no problems with the insertion of a nasogastric tube, which was identical to the one used during the previous surgery.
When the nerve ascends through the groove between the trachea and esophagus, it enters the larynx behind the thyroid and the cricoid cartilages. At this site, the nerve may be damaged by a foreign body pressing the nerve to the thyroid or cricoid cartilage, e.g., by a laryngeal mask airway (13).
Because all of these other causes for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy are very unlikely, the latter mechanism must be considered as being responsible for the nerve palsy in our case. During the repeated and unsuccessful attempts of intubating the esophagus, the tip of the TEE probe most likely compressed the nerve at its entry into the larynx.
Although one prospective study (2) found no correlation between placement of a TEE probe and incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, it is not in contrast to our findings because the previous study did not include patients with failed placement of a TEE probe, and its sample size was insufficient to reliably exclude a rare complication of TEE.
In summary, we report a case of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy most likely caused by unsuccessful attempts to place a TEE probe. Although unsuccessful placement of a TEE probe is uncommon, this mechanism of laryngeal nerve injury is of potential importance because laryngeal nerve palsy can cause postoperative respiratory insufficiency. The combination of anesthesia, muscle relaxation, and supine positioning may complicate probe insertion in rare cases; but it is even more important to note that it deprives the echocardiographer of patient feedback, such as expression of pain. The present case thus reinforces the importance of inserting TEE probes smoothly and avoiding any forceful or repeated attempts.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Itagaki, M. Kikura, and S. Sato Incidence and Risk Factors of Postoperative Vocal Cord Paralysis in 987 Patients After Cardiovascular Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2147 - 2152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Grocott, J. A. Clark, H. M. Homi, and A. Sharma "Other" Neurologic Complications After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 213 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|