JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lattermann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Goertz, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lattermann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Goertz, A.
Anesth Analg 2001;93:121-127
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Understanding the Mechanisms by Which Isoflurane Modifies the Hyperglycemic Response to Surgery

Ralph Lattermann, MD*, Thomas Schricker, MD, PhD*, Ulrich Wachter{dagger}, Michael Georgieff, MD, PhD{dagger}, and Axel Goertz, MD, PhD{ddagger}

*Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; {dagger}Clinic of Anesthesiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; and {ddagger}Department of Anesthesia, St. Marien-Krankenhaus, Ludwigshafen, Germany

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas Schricker, Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, Room S5.05, 687 Pine Ave. W., Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We studied the effect of anesthesia on the kinetics of perioperative glucose metabolism by using stable isotope tracers. Twenty-three patients undergoing cystoprostatectomy were randomly assigned to receive epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia (n = 8), fentanyl and midazolam anesthesia (n = 8), or inhaled anesthesia with isoflurane (n = 7). Whole-body glucose production and glucose clearance were measured before and during surgery. Glucose clearance significantly decreased during surgery independent of the type of anesthesia. Epidural analgesia caused a significant decrease in glucose production from 10.2 ± 0.4 to 9.0 ± 0.4 µmol · kg-1 · min-1 (P < 0.05), whereas the plasma glucose concentration was not altered (before surgery, 5.0 ± 0.2 mmol/L; during surgery, 5.2 ± 0.1 mmol/L). Glucose production did not significantly change during fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia (before surgery, 10.5 ± 0.5 µmol · kg-1 · min-1; during surgery, 10.1 ± 0.5 µmol · kg-1 · min-1), but plasma glucose concentration significantly increased from 4.8 ± 0.1 mmol/L to 5.3 ± 0.2 mmol/L during surgery (P < 0.05). Isoflurane anesthesia caused a significant increase in plasma glucose concentration (from 5.2 ± 0.1 mmol/L to 7.2 ± 0.5 mmol/L) and glucose production (from 10.8 ± 0.5 µmol · kg-1 · min-1 to 12.4 ± 1.0 µmol · kg-1 · min-1) (P < 0.05). Epidural analgesia prevented the hyperglycemic response to surgery by a decrease in glucose production. The increased glucose plasma concentration during fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia was caused by a decrease in whole-body glucose clearance. The hyperglycemic response observed during isoflurane anesthesia was a consequence of both impaired glucose clearance and increased glucose production.

Implications: Epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia prevented thehyperglycemic response to surgery by decreasing endogenous glucose production.The increased glucose plasma concentration in patients receivingfentanyl/midazolam anesthesia was caused by a decrease in whole-body glucoseclearance. The hyperglycemic response observed during inhaled anesthesia withisoflurane was a consequence of both impaired glucose clearance and increasedglucose production.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hyperglycemia is a prominent feature of the metabolic alterations induced by surgical trauma (1). A variety of studies demonstrated that the hyperglycemic response to surgery can be modified by the anesthetic technique. In contrast to inhaled anesthesia, epidural analgesia with local anesthetic established before surgery inhibits the increase in the glucose plasma concentration during abdominal operations (2,3). Furthermore, IV anesthesia with large or moderate doses of opioids attenuates or suppresses the hyperglycemic response to surgery (4,5). Because any decrease in the plasma glucose concentration might be the consequence of a decrease in endogenous glucose production, an increase in glucose uptake, or a combination of both events, it was unclear how the effects of different anesthetics on intraoperative hyperglycemia are mediated.

The goal of this investigation was to elucidate the mechanisms by which the hyperglycemic response to surgery is modified by different types of anesthesia. Therefore, the kinetics of intraoperative glucose metabolism (i.e., whole-body glucose production and glucose uptake) have been studied by stable isotope tracers in patients undergoing cystoprostatectomy receiving either epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia, fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia, or inhaled anesthesia with isoflurane.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from 23 patients with bladder cancer undergoing elective cystoprostatectomy followed by reconstruction of the bladder with small bowel via the ileal neobladder or ileal conduit technique. None of the participants was suffering from cardiac, hepatic, renal, or metabolic disorders or receiving medication known to affect glucose or lipid metabolism.

Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three different anesthetic techniques. One group received epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia with fentanyl and midazolam (n = 8). The second group received IV fentanyl and midazolam alone (n = 8). Patients in the third group received inhaled anesthesia with isoflurane (n = 7).

All patients were given premedication (20 mg chlorazepate orally) the night before surgery and 3 h before the operation. In the Epidural group, an epidural catheter was inserted at a thoracic level between T10 and T12, and segmental block (T4 through S5) was established with 0.5% bupivacaine, as judged from perception of pinprick. Anesthesia was induced with 0.15 mg/kg midazolam and 5–10 µg/kg fentanyl and was continued by boluses of midazolam. Epidural analgesia was maintained by the continuous administration of 0.25% bupivacaine 8–12 mL/h. Anesthesia in the Fentanyl/Midazolam group was induced with 0.15 mg/kg midazolam and 5–10 µg/kg fentanyl and maintained by intermittent boluses of fentanyl and midazolam to keep heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure within 20% of preoperative values. In the Isoflurane group, general anesthesia was induced with 5 mg/kg thiopentone and 1.5 µg/kg fentanyl. Anesthesia was continued by adjusting end-tidal isoflurane concentrations to keep heart rate and arterial pressure within 20% of preinduction values. In all patients, the trachea was intubated after neuromuscular block with 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine. The patients’ lungs were ventilated with 30% oxygen in nitrous oxide at a respiratory rate of 10 breaths/min to maintain normocapnia. Supplemental doses of vecuronium were applied as needed for complete surgical muscle relaxation. During surgery, patients received a balanced electrolyte solution at a rate of 10 mL · kg-1 · h-1. Colloids (3% gelatin; molecular weight, 35,000) were administered to keep the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) between 10 and 15 mm Hg.

Hemodynamic monitoring was performed with a three-lead electrocardiogram monitor and radial artery catheterization for continuous blood pressure measurement. In addition, a catheter was placed in the superior vena cava via the right jugular internal vein, and a thermistor-tipped 7F Swan-Ganz catheter was advanced into the pulmonary artery as judged from the pressure contour.

The rates of appearance of glucose (Ra glucose; endogenous glucose production) and glycerol (Ra glycerol; lipolysis) were determined before and during the operation by using [6,6-2H2]glucose and [1,1,2,3,3-2H5]glycerol (Masstrace, Woburn, MA). Sterile isotope solutions were prepared by the hospital pharmacy as previously described (6).

Preoperative measurements were taken after an overnight fast 3 days before surgery. A superficial vein in the dorsum of the hand was cannulated and kept patent with continuous saline infusion (2 mL · kg-1 · h-1). A second catheter was placed in a superficial vein of the contralateral arm for the infusion of [6,6-2H2]glucose and [1,1,2,3,3-2H5]glycerol. After warming the hand in a heated air box to achieve arterialized blood (SaO2 >95%), blood samples were obtained to determine basal isotopic enrichment. Thereafter, priming doses of [6,6-2H2]glucose (4 mg/kg) and [1,1,2,3,3-2H5]glycerol (0.11 mg/kg) were administered, followed by continuous infusions of 0.05 mg · kg-1 · min-1 [6,6-2H2]glucose and 0.007 mg · kg-1 · min-1 [1,1,2,3,3-2H5]glycerol, respectively. Three arterialized blood samples were drawn after 100, 110, and 120 min of isotope infusion, when the tracer was assumed to have reached an isotopic steady-state. On the day of surgery, the primed continuous infusion of stable isotopes was started at the beginning of surgery and, in analogy to the preoperative measurement, arterialized blood samples were taken 100, 110, and 120 min after skin incision.

At t = 110 min of pre- and intraoperative isotope infusion, plasma concentrations of metabolic substrates (glucose, glycerol, lactate, and nonesterified fatty acids) and hormones (insulin, glucagon, cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine) were determined. Preoperative hemodynamic monitoring included heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure by noninvasive oscillometric measurements. During the operation, PAOP, cardiac output (CO), and whole-body oxygen uptake ({image}O2) were recorded. CO was determined by using the Swan-Ganz catheter thermodilution technique. PAOP was quantified by means of the balloon inflation technique. {image}O2 was calculated with the Fick principle.

The isotopic plasma enrichments (atom percent excess; APE) of [6,6-2H2]glucose and [1,1,2,3,3-2H5]glycerol were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry as previously described (7). The APE values used in the calculation of the Ra glucose and glycerol were the means of the three APE measurements obtained at the two study periods. The Ra glucose and the Ra glycerol were derived from the equation Ra = I x (APEinf/APEpl - 1), where APEinf is the tracer enrichment in the infusate, APEpl is the tracer enrichment in plasma at steady state, and I is the tracer infusion rate. Steady-state conditions were assumed when the coefficient of variation of the three enrichment values was <5%.

In the physiologic steady-state, whole-body glucose uptake equals the rate of endogenous glucose production. Because glucose uptake increases proportionally as blood glucose concentrations increase, changes in whole-body glucose uptake do not necessarily reflect corresponding changes in the tissue’s ability to take up glucose. This may be because most glucose uptake occurs in noninsulin-sensitive tissues, and the rate of uptake is to a large extent determined by the diffusion gradient for glucose. Thus, the rate of glucose uptake has to be corrected for the prevailing plasma glucose concentration. The resulting value, the glucose clearance rate, calculated as the Ra glucose divided by the corresponding plasma glucose concentration, represents an index of the ability of tissues to take up glucose.

The fractional plasma clearance rate of glycerol was calculated as the Ra of glycerol divided by the glycerol plasma concentration.

Plasma concentrations of glucose, glycerol, lactate, and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) were measured by using enzymatic assays (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The mean intraassay and interassay coefficients of variance were 3.0% and 4.5% for glucose, 2.5% and 3.5% for glycerol, 2.5% and 4.0% for lactate, and 3.0% and 4.2% for NEFA. Insulin, glucagon, and cortisol were analyzed with radioimmunoassays (INS-RIA-100, Medgenix Diagnostics, Brussels, Belgium, for insulin; Double Antibody Glucagon RIA, Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, for glucagon; and DSL-200 SP Aktive Cortisol, Diagnostic System Laboratories, Sinsheim, Germany, for cortisol). The mean intraassay and interassay coefficients of variance were 5.6% and 8.3% for insulin, 4.8% and 8.0% for glucagon, and 3.0% and 7.0% for cortisol. Catecholamine concentrations were quantified by means of reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (Chromakon 500; Kotron, Eiching, Germany) with electrochemical detection. The mean intraassay and interassay coefficients of variance were 5.0% and 4.5% for epinephrine and 3.2% and 2.5% for norepinephrine, respectively.

Differences between the groups were tested by using the analysis of variance with post hoc analysis by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Within-group comparison of variables was made by Student’s t-test. A probability of P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Values are given as mean ± SEM.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The three groups were comparable regarding mean age (Fentanyl/Midazolam group, 58 ± 4 yr; Epidural group, 63 ± 3 yr; Isoflurane group, 66 ± 2 yr), body weight (Fentanyl/Midazolam group, 75 ± 3 kg; Epidural group, 75 ± 3 kg; Isoflurane group, 68 ± 5 kg), and height (Fentanyl/Midazolam group, 171 ± 2 cm; Epidural group, 171 ± 3 cm; Isoflurane group, 172 ± 4 cm). The amount of fentanyl administered during the first 120 min of surgery was 1.2 ± 0.1 mg in the Fentanyl/Midazolam group, 0.6 ± 0.1 mg in the Epidural group, and 0.1 ± 0.0 mg in the Isoflurane group. Patients in the Fentanyl/Midazolam group received 20 ± 2 mg midazolam, and patients in the Epidural group received 16 ± 4 mg midazolam. A significantly larger amount of colloids was given in the Epidural group (1238 ± 170 mL; P < 0.05) than in the Fentanyl/Midazolam group (681 ± 64 mL) and the Isoflurane group (671 ± 155 mL). No patient received autologous blood transfusion during the study period.

At baseline, the hemodynamic conditions were similar in the three groups (Table 1). During surgery, HR significantly decreased in both the Fentanyl/Midazolam group and the Epidural group to a value that was significantly less than in patients during isoflurane anesthesia (P < 0.05). HR and mean arterial blood pressure in the Epidural group were significantly less when compared with patients receiving fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences among the three groups with respect to CO, PAOP, and {image}O2 during the operation. The hematocrit significantly decreased during surgery to a comparable extent in all groups (P < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Hemodynamic Data, Whole-Body Oxygen Uptake, and Hematocrit
 
In all patients, a plateau in the enrichment of [6,6-2H2]glucose and [1,1,2,3,3-2H5]glycerol was achieved (coefficient of variation <5%), allowing steady-state calculations. Although the Ra glucose significantly decreased during epidural analgesia, it significantly increased during inhaled anesthesia, yielding a significantly higher value than in the Epidural and the Fentanyl/Midazolam groups (P < 0.05) (Table 2). In the Fentanyl/Midazolam group, the Ra glucose did not change significantly. Fentanyl/midazolam and isoflurane anesthesia were associated with a significant increase in intraoperative plasma glucose concentration (P < 0.05). In contrast, the plasma glucose concentration did not change in the Epidural group, revealing a significantly lower value than during inhaled anesthesia (P < 0.05). The glucose clearance significantly decreased in all patients during surgery (P < 0.05) without indicating any differences among the three groups. The Ra glycerol and glycerol clearance did not change in the Isoflurane and the Fentanyl/Midazolam groups but significantly decreased during epidural analgesia (P < 0.05). No changes in plasma glycerol concentrations could be observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Glucose and Glycerol Metabolism
 
In the Epidural group and the Fentanyl/Midazolam group, plasma lactate concentrations remained unaltered during surgery (Table 3). Inhaled anesthesia was associated with a significant increase in the intraoperative lactate plasma concentration (P < 0.05). No significant changes in NEFA, insulin, or glucagon plasma concentrations could be observed. During fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia, cortisol and catecholamine plasma concentrations tended to increase, but this increment was not significant. Compared with the Fentanyl/Midazolam group, the plasma concentrations of cortisol and catecholamines were reduced during epidural analgesia, showing significance for epinephrine only (P < 0.05). Intraoperative cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine plasma levels in the Epidural group were significantly less than during isoflurane anesthesia (P < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Plasma Concentrations of Metabolites, Hormones, and Catecholamines
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of this study demonstrate that the hyperglycemic response to surgery was prevented by epidural analgesia, attenuated by fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia, and not affected by inhaled anesthetics. Although whole-body glucose clearance decreased during surgery independent of the anesthetic technique used, epidural analgesia abolished the increase in plasma glucose concentration through an inhibitory effect on endogenous glucose production. Although not being influenced by fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia, intraoperative glucose production was stimulated by isoflurane anesthesia, leading to a more pronounced hyperglycemia.

In contrast to patients in the Isoflurane group, who showed an increase in the plasma glucose concentration by 40%, epidural analgesia suppressed the hyperglycemic response to surgery. This finding is in line with the results of numerous studies demonstrating that epidural analgesia with local anesthetic prevents the increase in the plasma glucose concentration during abdominal surgery (13). In agreement with previous study protocols that used similar amounts of fentanyl, fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia in this investigation did not completely suppress, but blunted, the intraoperative hyperglycemia when compared with patients receiving inhaled anesthesia (4,8).

Because measurements of glucose plasma concentrations alone do not provide insight into the underlying dynamic biochemical pathways, whole-body glucose production and glucose clearance in this study were assessed by a stable isotope tracer technique using [6,6-2H2]glucose.

Epidural analgesia significantly decreased endogenous glucose production and glucose clearance, resulting in an unaltered plasma glucose concentration during surgery. Although the effect of epidural analgesia on the intraoperative kinetics of glucose metabolism has not been investigated so far, a 20% reduction of glucose production by epidural blockade has been reported in patients studied between one and five days after various surgical interventions (9). Fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia did not affect endogenous glucose production, but it decreased glucose clearance, leading to a small but significant increase in the plasma glucose concentration. These findings are in agreement with the results of a previous study showing that neuroleptanesthesia does not influence splanchnic glucose release during cholecystectomy, as calculated from the measurement of splanchnic blood flow and the arteriohepatic venous difference of glucose (8). Isoflurane anesthesia in this study was associated with an increase in endogenous glucose production accompanied by a decreased glucose clearance. The effect of inhaled anesthesia on glucose kinetics during surgery has not yet been determined in humans. The results of animal studies, however, provide evidence that the hyperglycemic action of isoflurane, at least in part, is caused by the stimulation of glucose production (10). Our results support the contention that hyperglycemia during surgery performed under inhaled anesthesia is caused by both an increase in endogenous glucose production rate and a reduction in whole-body glucose uptake.

Under postabsorptive conditions, glycogenolysis constitutes approximately 75% of total endogenous glucose production, the remainder being derived from gluconeogenesis (11). In this study, the entire contribution of gluconeogenesis to total glucose production could not be quantified because the tracer used did not allow the identification of the metabolic pathway where glucose was produced. However, previous studies have shown an increased rate of gluconeogenesis during surgical trauma (12). Gluconeogenesis in the liver is a highly oxygen-consuming pathway, accounting for 50% of hepatic oxygen consumption in the postabsorptive state (13). Furthermore, gluconeogenesis has been proposed to occupy a central position in catabolic pathways, because muscle protein is broken down to supply amino acids serving as precursors for de novo glucose synthesis. It has been hypothesized that, by reducing accelerated gluconeogenesis, the amino acid release from the muscle can be reduced, resulting in better preservation of body protein (14). In a recent investigation, a significant correlation between protein breakdown and glucose production was observed after colorectal surgery, confirming this interdependence between protein and glucose metabolism (6). Thus, the decrease in hepatic glucose production as seen during epidural analgesia assumes clinical importance regarding the energy balance of the liver and protein catabolism.

Several factors may account for the effects of anesthesia on glucose homeostasis observed in our study. Hormone infusion studies in volunteers indicate that increased circulating concentrations of catecholamines and cortisol can mimic the perioperative changes in carbohydrate metabolism (15). It has been proposed that the endocrine mechanisms by which the metabolic effects of anesthesia are mediated are likely to be hormonal. In agreement with the results of previous studies that used isoflurane in similar doses, isoflurane anesthesia did not inhibit the intraoperative increase in the plasma concentrations of cortisol and catecholamines (16,17), which all stimulate hepatic gluconeogenesis and counteract the peripheral action of insulin, resulting in impaired glucose use and hyperglycemia (14). The plasma concentrations of cortisol and catecholamines tended to increase during fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia, but these changes did not reach statistical significance. Because total suppression of the endocrine response has been attained only with large-dose fentanyl anesthesia (50–100 µg/kg) (4), the average dose of 15 µg/kg fentanyl applied in this protocol was not sufficient to completely block the endocrine and hyperglycemic response. In accordance with earlier observations, epidural analgesia inhibited the endocrine response to surgery, as reflected in unchanged cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine plasma concentrations (2,3). This unaltered endocrine milieu in the Epidural group, however, does not necessarily explain the significant decrease in endogenous glucose production observed during surgery. Preoperative measurements in this study were performed three days before surgery after a 12-h fast. Because of bowel preparation on the day before the operation, patients at the time of surgery were fasting for approximately 26 hours. One study demonstrated that total glucose production significantly decreases with prolonged fasting, from 10.2 µmol · kg-1 · min-1 after 16 hours to 8.6 µmol · kg-1 · min-1 after 22 hours of fasting (18). These findings support the conclusion that the decrease in glucose production observed during surgery in the Epidural group was a consequence of fasting and that this physiologic effect was uninfluenced by epidural analgesia.

We assessed whole-body lipolysis in this protocol because there is recent evidence of a significant interdependence between the rates of lipolysis and glucose production (19). In contrast to fentanyl/midazolam and isoflurane anesthesia, epidural analgesia decreased the Ra glycerol, indicating a decrease in whole-body lipolysis during surgery. These results are in line with previous investigations showing an inhibitory effect of epidural analgesia on intraoperative lipolysis (3). Because the inhibition of lipolysis is associated with a decrease in glucose production independent of hormonal changes (19), the suppressive effect of epidural analgesia on lipolysis also may have contributed to the decrease in glucose production observed in the Epidural group.

Hepatic glucose production depends on the supply of precursors to the liver, i.e., lactate, alanine, and glycerol (20). In addition, the hepatic uptake of gluconeogenic substrates is a function of blood flow through the liver (21). Consequently, the effect of anesthesia on hemodynamics and liver perfusion gains metabolic importance. Secondary to sympathetic blockade and reduction of peripheral vascular resistance, intraoperative HR and mean arterial pressure in the Epidural group were less than in the other groups. To render all patients comparable with respect to their intravascular volume status, perioperative fluid loading was adjusted to keep PAOP between 10 and 15 mm Hg. From global hemodynamic measurements, however, one cannot predict changes of the regional blood flow in the splanchnic region. Although no formal assessment of hepatic blood flow was obtained, glycerol clearance represents an indirect variable of liver perfusion. From animal studies it is known that at plasma levels <1 mmol/L, there is almost complete extraction of glycerol in one single transhepatic passage (22). The clearance of substrates with such high extraction is profoundly affected by changes in the hepatic blood flow. In contrast to fentanyl/midazolam and inhaled anesthesia, glycerol clearance during epidural analgesia decreased in our study, lending support to the hypothesis that hepatic perfusion declined, which also has been reported by other investigators (23,24). Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that reduced liver perfusion concomitant with decreased substrate supply contributed to the diminished glucose production rate during epidural analgesia.

In conclusion, a stable isotope tracer technique was used to characterize the effect of different types of anesthesia on the hyperglycemic response to surgery and to elucidate the mechanisms whereby these effects are mediated. Epidural analgesia abolished the hyperglycemic response to surgery via a decrease in the glucose production rate. The moderate, but significant, increase in glucose plasma concentration during fentanyl/midazolam anesthesia was caused by a decrease in whole-body glucose uptake. The hyperglycemic response observed during inhaled anesthesia with isoflurane was a consequence of both impaired glucose uptake and increased glucose production.


    Acknowledgments
 
The help of the surgical and anesthesia nursing staff of the Department of Urology of the University Clinic Ulm is gratefully acknowledged.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schricker T, Lattermann R, Schreiber M, et al. The hyperglycaemic response to surgery: pathophysiology, clinical implications and modification by the anaesthetic technique. Clin Intensive Care 1998; 9: 118–28.
  2. Engquist A, Brandt MR, Fernandes A, Kehlet H. The blocking effect of epidural analgesia on the adrenocortical and hyperglycaemic responses to surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1977; 21: 330–5.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Kehlet H, Brandt MR, Prange-Hansen A, Alberti KG. Effect of epidural analgesia on metabolic profiles during and after surgery. Br J Surg 1979; 66: 543–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Giesecke K, Hamberger B, Järnberg PO, et al. High- and low-dose fentanyl anaesthesia: hormonal and metabolic responses during cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 1988; 61: 575–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Schricker T, Carli F, Schreiber M, et al. Propofol/sufentanil anesthesia suppresses the metabolic and endocrine response during, not after, lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 450–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Schricker T, Albuszies G, Weidenbach H, et al. Effects of epinephrine on glucose metabolism in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Hepatology 1996; 24: 330–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Schricker T, Wykes L, Carli F. Epidural blockade improves substrate utilization after surgery. Am J Physiol 2000; 279: E646–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lund J, Stjernström H, Jorfeldt L, Wiklund L. Effect of extradural analgesia on glucose metabolism and gluconeogenesis. Br J Anaesth 1986; 58: 851–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Shaw JHF, Galler L, Holdaway IM, Holdaway CM. The effect of extradural blockage upon glucose and urea kinetics in surgical patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987; 165: 260–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Horber FF, Krayer S, Miles J, et al. Isoflurane and whole body leucine, glucose and fatty acid metabolism in dogs. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 82–92.[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Consoli A, Kennedy F, Miles J, Gerich J. Determination of Krebs cycle metabolic carbon exchange in vivo and its use to estimate the individual contributions of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis to overall glucose output in man. J Clin Invest 1987; 80: 1303–10.
  12. Gump FE, Long CL, Geiger JW, Kinney JM. The significance of altered gluconeogenesis in surgical catabolism. J Trauma 1975; 15: 704–13.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Jungas RL, Halperin ML, Brosnan JT. Quantitative analysis of amino acid oxidation and related gluconeogenesis in humans. Physiol Rev 1992; 72: 419–48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wolfe RR. Carbohydrate metabolism and requirements. In: Rombeau JL, Caldwell MD, eds. Clinical nutrition: parenteral nutrition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993: 113–32.
  15. Bessey PQ, Watters JM, Aoki TT, Wilmore DW. Combined hormonal infusion stimulates the metabolic response to injury. Ann Surg 1984; 200: 264–81.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Carli F, Ronzoni G, Webster J, et al. The independent metabolic effect of halothane and isoflurane anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993; 37: 672–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Oyama T, Latto P, Holaday DA. Effect of isoflurane anaesthesia and surgery on carbohydrate metabolism and plasma cortisol levels in man. Can Anaesth Soc J 1975; 22: 696–702.[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Chandramouli V, Ekberg K, Schumann W, et al. Quantifying gluconeogenesis during fasting. Am J Physiol 1997; 273: 1209–15.
  19. Mittelman S, Bergman R. Inhibition of lipolysis causes suppression of endogenous glucose production independent of changes in insulin. Am J Physiol 2000; 279: E630–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Sacca L, Vigorito C, Cicala M, et al. Role of gluconeogenesis in epinephrine-stimulated hepatic glucose production in humans. Am J Physiol 1983; 245: E294–302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Nosadini R, Avogaro A, Mollo F, et al. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in cirrhosis: evidence that hepatic uptake of gluconeogenic precursors and of free fatty acids depends on effective hepatic flow. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1984; 58: 1125–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sestoft L, Fleron P. Kinetics of glycerol uptake by the perfused rat liver: membrane transport, phosphorylation and effect on NAD redox level. Biochim Biophys Acta 1975; 375: 462–71.[Medline]
  23. Greitz T, Andreen M, Irestedt L. Haemodynamics and oxygen consumption in the dog during high epidural block with special reference to the splanchnic region. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1983; 27: 211–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Lundberg J, Lundberg D, Norgren L, et al. Intestinal hemodynamics during laparotomy: effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia and dopamine in humans. Anesth Analg 1990; 71: 9–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Accepted for publication March 2, 2001.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. J. Zuurbier, P. J. M. Keijzers, A. Koeman, H. B. Van Wezel, and M. W. Hollmann
Anesthesia's Effects on Plasma Glucose and Insulin and Cardiac Hexokinase at Similar Hemodynamics and Without Major Surgical Stress in Fed Rats
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 135 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Lattermann, G. Belohlavek, S. Wittmann, B. Fuchtmeier, and M. Gruber
The Anticatabolic Effect of Neuraxial Blockade After Hip Surgery
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2005; 101(4): 1202 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. S. Anderson, M. Thamotharan, D. Kao, S. U. Devaskar, L. Qiao, J. E. Friedman, and W. W. Hay Jr
Effects of acute hyperinsulinemia on insulin signal transduction and glucose transporters in ovine fetal skeletal muscle
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): R473 - R481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
K. S Lewis, S. L Kane-Gill, M. B. Bobek, and J. F Dasta
Intensive Insulin Therapy for Critically Ill Patients
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2004; 38(7): 1243 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Lattermann, F. Carli, L. Wykes, and T. Schricker
Perioperative Glucose Infusion and the Catabolic Response to Surgery: The Effect of Epidural Block
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 555 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Schricker, R. Lattermann, P. Fiset, L. Wykes, and F. Carli
Integrated analysis of protein and glucose metabolism during surgery: effects of anesthesia
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 2523 - 2530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lattermann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Goertz, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lattermann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Goertz, A.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press