| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of General Anesthesiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and *Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jonathan H. Waters, MD, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of General Anesthesiology, E-31, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195. Address e-mail to Watersj{at}ccf.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition, this case indicated that Sonoclot® (SNC; Sienco, Wheat Ridge, CO) might detect platelet dysfunction in the presence of an apparently normal Thrombelastograph® (TEG®; Haemoscope, Skokie, IL) tracing. This led us to conduct the in vitro study to examine the sensitivity of these two methods for detecting platelet dysfunction in the presence of the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, eptifibatide, which was the last antiplatelet drug our patient received before surgery.
| Case Report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Methods
After IRB approval and written consent, 10 mL of blood was drawn from 12 volunteers. These volunteers had been asked to take no antiplatelet drugs and herbal supplements for 14 days before blood sampling. In addition, they had nothing by mouth for 12 h before the blood draw. The whole blood samples were collected into siliconized Vacutainer glass tubes containing 3.8% trisodium citrate with a sodium citrate/blood ratio maintained at 9:1 (vol/vol). The eptifibatide stock solution was prepared by diluting it with 0.9% normal saline. We added 10 µL of this stock solution to each blood sample (350 µL) in disposable TEG® or SNC® cuvettes. The final eptifibatide concentrations in the cuvettes was 4 µg/mL (0.5 x therapeutic clinical concentration), 8 µg/mL (1.0 x therapeutic plasma concentration), and 18.5 µg/mL (2.2 x therapeutic plasma concentration). A 0.9% saline solution (10 µL) was used as a control. Collected citrated whole blood was incubated for 5 min at 37°C before analyses. Before each test, the blood sample was recalcified with 0.013 mL of 0.2 M CaCl2. The analysis of the following TEG® ratio variables was performed: R (reaction time, time from sample placement in the cuvette until TEG® tracing amplitude reaches 2 mm; represents the rate of initial fibrin formation), K, clot formation time (measured from R time to the point when the amplitude of the tracing reaches 20 mm; represents the time for development of fixed degree of viscoelasticity during clot formation),
angle (
°) (angle formed by the slope of the initial TEG® tracing; denotes speed at which solid clot forms, MA (the greatest amplitude of the TEG® tracing and is a reflection of the absolute strength of the fibrin clot, i.e., reflects platelet function). The following SNC® variables were recorded: sonACT, Sonoclot activated clotting time (liquid phase or onset of clot formation, may be compared to the R interval in TEG®), clot rate (slope of the SNC® signature, characterizes fibrin gel formation and correlates with the TEG®
°, and Platelet Function (a number calculated from an algorithm that takes into account elements of clot retraction from the SNC® signature; it can be compared to the TEG® MA variable). We also measured SNC® time-to-peak (this variable represents the amount of time SNC® signature reaches the peak; it places great emphasis on how fast it takes to activate platelets rather than how much the platelets contribute to the clot retraction). Comparisons between TEG® and SNC® variables (only those that reflect platelet function) were made for each of the above three concentrations of eptifibatide. MA and SNC® platelet function values decreased while time-to-peak increased in the presence of eptifibatide. For statistical analysis we compared relative changes of each test regardless of the direction of that change. Statistical analysis was performed by repeated-measures analysis of variance, and differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. All variables were expressed as mean and SD. A coefficient of variation for both methods was performed by repeatedly (n = 5) measuring SNC® Platelet Function and TEG® MA on a blood sample from a single patient.
Results
Figure 2 shows the TEG® and SNC® dose-response tracings to eptifibatide. The eptifibatide effect on SNC® signature clot retraction is characteristic; in all studied concentrations eptifibatide only delayed clot retraction, but it never inhibited it completely. Figure 3 compares relative changes of TEG® MA, and SNC® Platelet Function and time-to-peak. At lower levels of platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade (4 µm/mL eptifibatide), the TEG® MA and SNC® Platelet Function were reduced 16 ± 9% and 28 ± 14% from baseline, respectively (P <0.03), while time-to-peak increased 45% above the baseline. At normal therapeutic range (8 µg/mL) and above the therapeutic range (18.5 µg/mL) SNC® Platelet Function and TEG® MA exhibited similar reductions (approximately 40% and 60%, respectively) (P = 0.9). At any concentration of eptifibatide studied, SNC® time-to-peak variable changed the most. Table 1 shows absolute values of TEG® and SNC® variables before and after addition of eptifibatide. There was an 18% to 20% variability in baseline values between the patients. Coefficient of variation for TEG® MA and SNC® Platelet Function was 1.6% and 2.6%, respectively (n = 5 each).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The activated form of GP IIb/IIIa mediates the final common pathway of platelet aggregation. The reversibility of platelet inhibition and the rate of plasma clearance are largely a function of GP IIb/IIIa pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties (4). Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug that inhibits the binding of adenosine 5'-diphosphate to its platelet receptor, which leads to direct inhibition of the binding of fibrinogen to the GP IIb/IIIa receptor. The antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel lasts about 10 days, which corresponds to the life span of the platelet (5). Abciximab, a direct high-affinity GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, has a biologic half-life of eight hours (6,7). Abciximab can be detected on the surface of circulating platelets for at least two weeks after discontinuation of the drug (8). Eptifibatide has a higher specificity and a lower affinity for GP IIb/IIIa receptors resulting in a biological half-life of 2.5 hours and a rapidly reversible antiplatelet effect (4). A substantial recovery of platelet aggregation is apparent within four hours of completion of eptifibatide infusion, whereas the bleeding time returns to baseline within one hour (9).
In our patient, a SNC® signature performed more than 12 hours after discontinuation of eptifibatide therapy clearly showed poor platelet function, suggesting that we should not assume the cessation of the effects of antiplatelet drugs based on their individual pharmacokinetic principles. At the same time, a TEG® tracing appeared within normal limits (Fig. 1), which suggests that TEG® and SNC® may have different sensitivities in detecting changes in the viscoelastic properties of blood treated with antiplatelet drugs.
One of the problems in accurately assessing the level of platelet dysfunction with TEG® and SNC® is the wide range of normal values (Table 1) that is caused by person-to-person variability; i.e., differences in platelet counts, fibrinogen concentrations, and variability in number of GP IIb/IIIa receptors and its ligand-binding function (10). We have demonstrated that in healthy individuals who were not on antiplatelet medications, normal values of TEG® and SNC® varied up to 20%. At the same time, the small dose of eptifibatide decreased platelet function (as represented by the change in test values) an average of 15% for TEG® and 28% for SNC®. Therefore, for both methods, there may be an overlap of values from either normal blood or blood treated with antiplatelet drugs. This may be more true for the TEG® MA that changes less than SNC® Platelet Function at low levels of platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. In other words, TEG® MA may still be in a "normal" range despite the presence of moderate platelet inhibition, and in the absence of a baseline tracing it may be difficult to interpret the results. Unfortunately, there is a problem because we typically do not have a baseline TEG® or SNC® tracings performed before antiplatelet therapy was instituted.
This study showed that at smaller clinical concentrations of eptifibatide (4 µg/mL), SNC® was a more sensitive monitor of inhibited platelet activation than TEG®. At normal (8 µg/mL) and large (18.5 µg/mL) clinical concentrations, both SNC® and TEG® measured decreases in platelet activation with equal sensitivity. At any used eptifibatide concentration, SNC® time-to-peak was affected more than the TEG® MA was (Fig. 3). It is equally important to note that eptifibatide in the studied concentrations never completely inhibited SNC® time-to-peak; therefore, this variable was always available for qualitative visual assessment. Also, this indicates a very specific action of eptifibatide on platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptors: clot retraction is always present, albeit prolonged. This visual qualitative assessment of the SNC® signature might be useful because the sharp, well-defined peak indicates strong clot retraction (good platelet function) whereas a poorly defined peak and its delayed onset indicate weak and slow clot retraction (poor platelet function). Therefore, even in the absence of a baseline reference the configuration of SNC® signature will be visibly altered when platelet dysfunction is present, and we believe that exactly this characteristic of SNC® signature represents an advantage over any other numerical value.
In conclusion, patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa antagonists should be evaluated before surgery with platelet function tests, and adequate platelet function should not be assumed based on the drugs pharmacokinetic profiles. TEG® and SNC® can be used as bedside monitors for assessment of platelet activation; however, baseline values before an antiplatelet drug is given are necessary to quantify the extent of antiplatelet action. In the absence of a reference tracing (baseline), the changes in SNC® signature configuration might be more indicative of platelet dysfunction compared with the TEG® tracing. This might be especially true at the lower levels of platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. T. Ganter and C. K. Hofer Coagulation Monitoring: Current Techniques and Clinical Use of Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Coagulation Devices Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1366 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Tucci, M. T. Ganter, C. R. Hamiel, R. Klaghofer, A. Zollinger, and C. K. Hofer Platelet function monitoring with the Sonoclot analyzer after in vitro tirofiban and heparin administration J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1314 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Katori, F. Szlam, J. H. Levy, and K. A. Tanaka A Novel Method to Assess Platelet Inhibition by Eptifibatide with Thrombelastograph(R) Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1794 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Tanaka, N. Katori, F. Szlam, N. Sato, A. B. Kelly, and J. H. Levy Effects of tirofiban on haemostatic activation in vitro Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2004; 93(2): 263 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Chun, B. A. Orser, and M. Madan Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors: Overview and Implications for the Anesthesiologist Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 879 - 888. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|