| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||

*Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University; and
Pain Clinic, Kuo General Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Yu-Chuan Tsai, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, 138 Sheng-Li Rd., Tainan 704, Taiwan. Address e-mail to yctsai{at}mail.ncku.edu.tw
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IMPLICATIONS: This study was performed to compare the antishivering and side effects among tramadol, amitriptyline, and meperidine for the treatment of postepidural anesthetic shivering in parturients. Both tramadol and meperidine show a significantly faster response rate in the treatment of shivering when compared with amitriptyline. Tramadol had a less frequent incidence of somnolence than meperidine.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tramadol hydrochloride, a centrally-acting analgesic drug, is effective in the treatment of shivering after epidural anesthesia (EA) in parturients (1). In addition to a µ-opioid agonist effect, it exerts a modulatory effect on central monoaminergic pathways, inhibiting the neuronal uptake of noradrenaline and serotonin (25). In this respect, there are parallels between the mechanisms of action of tramadol and antidepressants such as amitriptyline, which are believed to potentiate the effects of biogenic amines (68). Meperidine, a combined µ- and
-receptor agonist, is frequently recommended for the treatment of postanesthetic shivering (912). Much evidence has suggested that the antishivering effects of meperidine are mediated by
-receptor activity (10,13,14).
This prospective, double-blinded, and randomized clinical study was performed to compare the anti- shivering effects and the accompanying side effects among tramadol, meperidine, and amitriptyline for the treatment of post-EA shivering in parturients.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
EA was instituted at the lumbar vertebrae 3-4 or 4-5 interspace, with 2% lidocaine 15 mL combined with epinephrine 1:80,000. The volume of IV fluid and the use of ephedrine for hypotension were determined by attending anesthesiologists. The administration of pre- or intraoperative opioids was not permitted. Patients were supplemented with oxygen 6 L/min by face mask and covered with sheets but not actively warmed during anesthesia. All preloading fluids and drugs were used at room temperature. Of the 115 parturients, 45 who shivered during cesarean delivery under EA and requested antishivering treatment were randomly allocated to one of three groups for IV treatment: Group T (n = 15) received tramadol hydrochloride 0.5 mg/kg, Group M (n = 15) received meperidine 0.5 mg/kg, and Group A (n = 15) received amitriptyline hydrochloride 15 or 20 mg. The dosage of tramadol and meperidine was chosen according to previous studies (1,16).
Parturients did not know which drug was administered. The nursing anesthetists, who were unaware of the parturients group and treatments, measured the time elapsed from treatment to the time when shivering ceased. If shivering did not cease after 15 min, the treatment was regarded as ineffective. Treatment efficacy was evaluated subjectively by the parturient as no improvement, partial improvement, or marked improvement. Side effects, such as pruritus, somnolence (mildly sedated but easily aroused or heavily sedated), dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and Apgar scores of the newborns at 1 and 5 min, were recorded. Vital signs were measured before and 15 min after EA, as well as 5 min after treatment.
A study population of 15 patients for each group was determined to have a statistical power >90% at
= 0.05 (two-tailed) to detect a difference of 60% in the incidence compared with the Amitriptyline group in response to Tramadol and Meperidine groups for post-EA shivering treatment. Statistical analysis was performed with the software GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Parametric data were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance. Nonparametric data were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Category data were analyzed by using the
2 test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
2 test, Table 2). Eighty-seven percent of Group A patients showed no changes in shivering 15 min after treatment. The time that elapsed from treatment to the time shivering ceased was 5.1 ± 3.6 min for Group T (n = 13) and 4.2 ± 2.3 min for Group M (n = 14). The number of patients who assessed treatment efficacy as no, partial, and marked improvement was 0, 1, and 14 for Group T; 0, 1, and 14 for Group M; and 13, 0, and 2 for Group A , respectively (P < 0.01,
2 test, Table 2).
|
2 test, Table 2). No parturient in Group T complained of dizziness; however, 20% in Groups A and M developed dizziness (P < 0.01,
2 test, Table 2). There were no significant differences among groups in Apgar scores of newborns at 1 and 5 min (Table 3). In addition, the results of arterial blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and pulse oxygen saturation were not significantly different before EA, 15 min after EA, and 5 min after treatment among the groups.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The exact mechanism of shivering under EA has not been fully established. The possible mechanisms of shivering during EA in parturients result from central thermoregulation (19,20). Pharmacologic drugs remain the most popular mode for treatment and prevention of shivering. Meperidine is a commonly used medication for controlling postanesthetic shivering and apparently inhibits shivering when compared with amitriptyline; it was comparable to tramadol in this study. Although the mechanism of meperidines antishivering effect has yet to be fully elucidated, IV meperidine controlled shivering better than equianalgesic doses of pure µ-opioid agonists such as fentanyl, alfentanil, sufentanil, or morphine (1012), and the antishivering effects of meperidine were not reversed by small doses, but they were reversed by large-dose naloxone (10,13). Accordingly, the antishivering effect of meperidine may be mediated in part by activation of
-opioid receptors, but not of µ-opioid receptors. However, meperidine probably acts directly on the thermoregulatory center and not all through the receptor activation.
Disadvantages of meperidine treatment are the side effects of sedation and respiratory depression, which may be induced with previously administered opioids or anesthetics. In this study, the incidence of somnolence in the group that received meperidine (33%) was more frequent than in those who received tramadol (7%) or amitriptyline (0%). Pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were also important potential side effects but did not occur frequently with the dosage we used. Because both tramadol and meperidine have similar shivering-quenching effects, whereas tramadol has a decreased incidence of central depressive effects, tramadol should be considered superior to meperidine for the treatment of shivering in parturients.
Tramadol is effective in the treatment of postanesthetic shivering (9). In the study of Chan et al. (1), IV tramadol (0.25 mg/kg) effectively controlled shivering during cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia with minimal side effects; however, increasing the tramadol dose to 0.5 mg/kg did not increase its therapeutic effect. Tramadols distinct features in the treatment of shivering reside in its weak sedative and smaller respiratory depressive properties than morphine (21), particularly in parturients and patients with poor cardiorespiratory reserves (9). Tramadol inhibits the neuronal reuptake of norepinephrine and 5-hydroxytrypamine, facilitates 5-hydroxytrypamine release, and activates µ-opioid receptors (35). Each of these actions is likely to influence thermoregulatory control. However, tramadol had only slight thermoregulatory effects (22). Thus, it is unlikely to provoke hypothermia or to facilitate fever. The main opioid effect of tramadol is mediated via the µ receptor, with minimal effect at
- or
-binding sites (5). Tramadol and its enantiomers are bound with only weak affinity to cloned human µ-opioid receptors expressed in neuroblastoma cell line HN9.10, and they are bound with even less affinity for human
- or
-opioid receptors. The O-desmethyl metabolite (M1) of tramadol and its enantiomers are bound with higher affinity than the parent compounds at µ-opioid receptors with less affinity for
- or
-opioid receptors, although still with a much lower affinity than morphine (23).
The potent antinociceptive effects of tramadol were significantly decreased by yohimbine and idazoxan (both
2-adrenoceptor antagonists) (24). In this respect, tramadol is similar to clonidine, a partial
2-adrenoceptor agonist that is also useful in the treatment of postoperative shivering (25). Delaunay et al. (26) showed that clonidine reduced the thermoregulatory thresholds for both vasoconstriction and shivering. This suggests that it acts by impairing central thermoregulatory control. However, clonidine is associated with side effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation (27). Tramadol may induce its antishivering effects via the additive or synergistic action of both
-opioid receptor and
2-adrenergic agonist mechanisms. The interaction of
-opioid and
2-adrenoceptor mechanisms working in a complementary or synergistic manner to produce antishivering effects seems a possible explanation.
As an inhibitor of the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine in the central nervous system, the mechanism of action of tramadol resembles that of amitriptyline, one of the tricyclic antidepressants that is often suggested in neuropathic pain management. Amitriptyline inhibits the amine pump uptake of neurotransmitters, e.g., norepinephrine and serotonin (68). It produces varying degrees of sedation and blocks
1-adrenergic, H1, and H2 receptors. The antidepressants have many anticholinergic side effects, such as tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension, urinary retention, reduced gut motility, and visual problems, and these limit its use in some situations. Chronic treatment with amitriptyline produces supersensitivity to the nicotinic mechanism, which is involved in the regulation of core temperature in rats (28). Moreover, amitriptyline attenuates the febrile response to a pyrogen in rabbits, but it lacks this effect in afebrile animals (29). In this study, amitriptyline at both 15 and 20 mg had no significant effects in the treatment of shivering during EA in parturients when compared with tramadol or meperidine. This may have resulted from the single and relatively small doses of amitriptyline used when compared with the dose for an antidepressant effect. However, the single and small doses of both meperidine and tramadol induced significant effects in the treatment of shivering. Thus, this may imply that the mechanism of tramadol in the treatment of shivering is not strongly mediated by central monoaminergic pathways.
In conclusion, both tramadol (0.5 mg/kg) and meperidine (0.5 mg/kg) effectively treated patients with post-EA shivering. However, amitriptyline at both 15 and 20 mg did not show significant effects in the treatment of shivering.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Honarmand and M. R. Safavi Comparison of prophylactic use of midazolam, ketamine, and ketamine plus midazolam for prevention of shivering during regional anaesthesia: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2008; 101(4): 557 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-D. Roy, M. Girard, and P. Drolet Intrathecal Meperidine Decreases Shivering During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 230 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kudoh, H. Takase, and T. Takazawa Chronic Treatment with Antidepressants Decreases Intraoperative Core Hypothermia Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2003; 97(1): 275 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|