| JOURNAL HOME | CME HOME | THIS MONTH | PAST ISSUES | ETOC | COLLECTIONS |
| AUTHORS | REVIEWERS | EDITORIAL BOARD | FEEDBACK | RSS | HELP |
 
|
|
|
||
|
|
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Improvements in analgesia after major surgery may allow a more rapid recovery and shorter hospital stay. We performed a prospective randomized trial to study the effects of epidural analgesia on the length of hospital stay after coronary artery surgery. The anesthetic technique and postoperative mobilization were altered to facilitate early intensive care discharge and hospital discharge. Fifty patients received high (T1 to T4) thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) with ropivacaine 1% (4-mL bolus, 3–5 mL/h infusion), with fentanyl (100-µg bolus, 15–25 µg/h infusion) and a propofol infusion (6 mg · kg-1 · h-1). Another 50 patients (the General Anesthesia group) received fentanyl 15 µg/kg and propofol (5 mg · kg-1 · h-1), followed by IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia. The TEA group had lower visual analog scores with coughing postextubation (median, 0 vs 26 mm; P < 0.0001) and were extubated earlier (median hours [interquartile range], 3.2 [2.1–4.6] vs 6.7 [3.3–13.2]; P < 0.0001). More than half of all patients were discharged home on Postoperative Day 4 (24%) or 5 (33%), but there was no difference in the length of stay between the TEA group (median [interquartile range], Day 5 [5–6]) and the General Anesthesia group (median [interquartile range], Day 5 [4–7]). There were no differences in postoperative spirometry or chest radiograph changes or in markers for postoperative myocardial ischemia or infarction. No significant TEA-related complications occurred. In summary, TEA provided better analgesia and allowed earlier tracheal extubation but did not reduce the length of hospital stay after coronary artery surgery.
IMPLICATIONS: We found that epidural analgesia was more effective than IV morphine for cardiac surgery. Epidural anesthesia also allowed earlier weaning from mechanical ventilation, but it did not affect hospital discharge time.
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Research over the past 10 years into the use of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and ischemic heart disease has focused predominantly on its advantageous effects on coronary blood flow (1,2), left ventricular function (3), relief of angina (4,5), hemodynamic stability (6,7), attenuation of stress response hormones (8–10), and surrogate markers of respiratory function (11–13). At the same time, there has been a widespread trend toward more rapid recovery after CABG, with earlier extubation and shorter stays in intensive care and in the hospital (fast-track cardiac anesthesia and surgery) (14).
Despite acknowledgment of the theoretical advantages of epidural analgesia in facilitating more rapid recovery in surgery (15), this hypothesis has not been formally tested in the cardiac surgical population. Previous authors have demonstrated earlier extubation with TEA (10,12,13,16,17); however, the general perioperative management did not attempt to fast-track patients. Our aim in this study was to determine the effect of TEA on extubation time in the setting of a currently accepted fast-track cardiac anesthetic technique and to determine whether any advantage in postoperative analgesia from TEA could decrease the time taken to achieve set criteria for hospital discharge. We implemented an accelerated mobilization program to take advantage of any improvements in analgesia in either group of this randomized study.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The study was approved by the local hospital Research and Ethics Committee, and all patients gave written informed consent. Specifically, the risk and consequences of epidural hematoma formation were discussed with all patients. All patients presenting for elective CABG were eligible for inclusion unless they had one or more of the following exclusion criteria: contraindications to the epidural technique (e.g., preexisting coagulopathy, anticoagulation [i.e., full therapeutic doses of standard or low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, thrombolytic drugs, or potent antiplatelet drugs], or systemic or local infection); arthritis of the thoracic or cervical spine with a history of associated neurologic deficit; coexisting surgery (e.g., valvular, carotid, or aortic surgery); contraindications to any of the intended drugs in the treatment protocol; significant alcohol or other substance abuse; cognitive impairment; or other reason for inability to comply with treatment as assessed by the investigators. Although usually ceased 1 week before surgery by the surgical team, aspirin and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were not considered contraindications to the placement of an epidural catheter.
Block randomization using sealed envelopes was used, and patients at high risk were randomized separately. High-risk classification criteria were poor left ventricular function (ejection fraction <0.4), repeat sternotomy, coexisting significant valvular heart disease, age older than 70 yr, morbid obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m2), chronic renal dysfunction (creatinine >200 µmol/L), chronic airflow limitation (forced expiratory volume <50% of predicted), or severe diabetes (defined as having three or more of the following: previous myocardial infarction, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, peripheral or autonomic neuropathy, or renal dysfunction). Blinding of patients or investigators was not considered feasible.
All patients were given lorazepam 2 mg on the evening before surgery and morphine 0.1 mg/kg IM plus midazolam 0.05 mg/kg IM 1 h before arrival in the operating suite, followed by oxygen delivered via face mask. Supplemental IV midazolam was administered in the anesthetic bay if necessary to assist the institution of invasive monitoring.
Monitoring of all patients included five-lead electrocardiography (ECG), a three-channel Holter recorder (Medilog MR-FD3; Oxford, UK) for 24 h commencing at the induction of anesthesia, radial intraarterial catheter, central venous pressure (CVP) via the internal jugular vein (or pulmonary artery catheterization in high-risk patients, as defined previously), oximetry, capnography, and nasopharyngeal and rectal temperature.
The TEA group had a side-holed epidural catheter (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) via an 18-gauge Tuohy needle inserted the evening before surgery in the thoracic region between T1 and T4, with a test dose of 2% lidocaine 3–4 mL used to confirm placement. In the event of a bloody tap, an alternative level was attempted for epidural placement, but surgery was not postponed. On the day of surgery, after monitoring devices were inserted, an epidural bolus of 4 mL ropivacaine 1% and fentanyl 100 µg was administered, with supplemental ropivacaine 1% given as necessary to obtain blockade of pain or cold sensation to ice in the distribution of the T1 to T6 dermatomes. Failure to obtain such a block with 10 mL of 1% ropivacaine constituted failure of the epidural technique; alternative methods of anesthesia and analgesia were implemented, and the patient was excluded from per-protocol analysis. After the bolus, an epidural infusion was commenced with ropivacaine 1% and fentanyl 5 µg/mL, and this continued for 48 h at 3–5 mL/h. General anesthesia (GA) in the TEA group consisted of IV fentanyl 2 µg/kg plus propofol 15 mg · kg-1 · h-1 until consciousness was lost, followed by a propofol infusion at 6 mg · kg-1 · h-1, which continued until wiring of the sternum was completed.
The GA group received fentanyl 15 µg/kg in divided doses from the induction of anesthesia to sternotomy, in addition to propofol 15 mg · kg-1 · h-1 until loss of consciousness, followed by a propofol infusion of 5 mg · kg-1 · h-1 (the larger fentanyl dose allowed a slightly smaller propofol dose than in the TEA group) until sternal closure. During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), a morphine infusion was commenced at 40 µg · kg-1 · h-1.
All patients received pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg for muscle relaxation and antibiotic prophylaxis with cephazolin 2 g. Aprotinin was given at the discretion of the surgeon. Median sternotomy and CPB were used for all cases. CPB was standardized by using membrane oxygenation, blood cardioplegia, cooling to maintain temperature at 30°C–34°C, and 
-stat pH management. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) during CPB was maintained at 50–70 mm Hg and heparin administered to maintain the activated clotting time longer than 400 s. After termination of CPB, protamine was administered to normalize the activated clotting time. Muscle relaxation was reversed with neostigmine (50 µg/kg) and atropine (20 µg/kg), and all patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU), intubated, and ventilated.
Intraoperative hemodynamic management was similar for both groups and aimed to maintain the MAP pre- and post-CPB between 65 and 85 mm Hg. Hypotension was treated with IV crystalloid fluids until the CVP was >10 mm Hg or >5 mm Hg above baseline CVP. Persistent hypotension was treated with boluses of ephedrine 6 mg (for MAP <65 mm Hg) or metaraminol 0.5–1 mg (for MAP <60 mm Hg), or with an epinephrine infusion if the cardiac index was <2.4 L · min-1 · m-2. Hypertension was treated with a bolus of propofol (0.5 mg/kg) up to a maximum of three boluses per hour, or with a bolus of epidural ropivacaine 1% 2 mL in the TEA group. Persistent hypertension was treated with a further IV fentanyl 5 µg/kg bolus in the GA group and with the commencement of a nitroglycerine infusion in both groups.
Patients in the ICU were weaned from positive pressure ventilation and extubated when they met set criteria (Table 1) as assessed by the ICU nursing staff. If required, propofol (0.5–3 mg · kg-1 · h-1) was used to provide sedation before extubation. Patients were rewarmed with forced-air convection blankets to a core temperature 
37°C. The ICU had a step-down high-dependency area to which all patients were moved on Day 1 unless they were still intubated or were hemodynamically unstable. The following day (Day 2 for most patients), the patients were moved to a general ward. Attempts to adhere to ICU discharge criteria were initially considered but found not to be feasible because the time of ICU discharge was constrained by bed availability (in the step-down and general wards) and the time of day (a reluctance to discharge ICU patients late at night).
|
Commencing on the first postoperative day, all patients took part in a mobilization program that continued until hospital discharge or until a plateau had been reached. Mobilization goals were set (Table 2) and were attempted three times per day, with some goals being skipped if the patient was making rapid progress. Goals were not attempted if patients were experiencing any of the following: excessive pain, sedation, nausea or vomiting, excessive chest tube drainage, any dyspnea at rest, or hemodynamic instability. Mobilization was supervised by existing nursing and physiotherapy staff and an additional research nurse, and achievement of goals was assessed by the research nurse. Patients were also encouraged to commence oral intake and resume normal functional activity as soon as possible. The postoperative day on which the patient met our criteria for hospital discharge was documented (Table 3); however, the actual day of discharge was determined by the surgical team and was also documented.
|
|
Postoperative analgesia in the TEA group consisted of continuation of the intraoperative epidural infusion for 48 h (infusion range 3–5 mL/h with boluses of 2 mL as necessary), followed by epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with meperidine (20-mg bolus with 10-min lockout) for a further 24 h. Meperidine was chosen because it was our hospital’s existing preference for epidural PCA use, on the basis of its epidural pharmacokinetic profile. Shoulder tip or abdominal pain in the first 48 h was treated with epidural meperidine 25 mg as necessary, and leg wound pain was treated with boluses of IV morphine 1–2 mg as necessary. Analgesia in the GA group was provided with a continuous morphine infusion titrated by the ICU nurse until the morning of the first postoperative day, when IV morphine PCA was commenced (1- to 1.4-mg boluses, 5-min lockout, no background infusion). The PCA continued for 72 h or until morphine requirements were <2.5 mg/h for more than 12 h. Both groups received 3 days of oral naproxen 500 mg twice daily (unless contraindicated by previous peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, hematologic or renal dysfunction, or aspirin-sensitive asthma) and paracetamol 1 g every 6 h. After Day 3, analgesia consisted of oxycodone or codeine and paracetamol at the discretion of the surgical team.
The height, weight, age, and sex of all patients were recorded, as were perioperative surgical details, including aortic cross-clamp time and CPB time. Total doses of anesthetics, inotropes, vasodilators, and vasopressors were recorded. The time to tracheal extubation (from arrival in the ICU) was recorded, as was the time taken to achieve the mobilization goal of walking up two flights of stairs and the postoperative day on which the patient was discharged. The postoperative day on which patients met the predetermined hospital discharge criteria was also recorded in the event that it did not coincide with the day that the patients were actually discharged.
Myocardial ischemia was assessed by automated analysis of Holter monitoring (Medilog MR-FD3) for 24 h, commencing at the induction of anesthesia. Ischemia was defined as ST segment depression (at 60 ms past the J point) of >1 mm for more than 1 min (18). Abnormal traces were subsequently reviewed by a blinded cardiologist who excluded traces thought to be due to artifact. Permanent myocardial damage was assessed by detecting new Q waves (assessed by the blinded cardiologist) on a 12-lead ECG on Days 0, 1, 2, and 4 and by assessing venous blood levels of troponin T and creatine kinase MB fraction on arrival in the ICU and again at 4, 12, and 24 h and on Postoperative Day 2.
Arterial blood analyses were performed pre- and post-CPB, on arrival to the ICU, after extubation, and on Postoperative Day 1. Oxygen saturation was measured by pulse oximetry continuously during surgery and afterward for 24 h. Oxygen saturation on room air was also measured daily from Postoperative Days 1 to 4. Spirometric estimation of forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were measured by trained physiotherapy or research staff preoperatively; postoperatively; on Days 1, 2, and 4; and at a follow-up appointment between 4 and 6 wk postoperatively. Chest radiographs were taken preoperatively, on arrival to ICU, and postoperatively on Days 1 and 2 and were assessed by a blinded radiologist who scored the degree of atelectasis as follows: no changes, 0; small platelike changes, 1; large sublobar areas of opacification, 2; and complete lobar collapse, 3.
Analgesia was assessed by a trained research assistant with the visual analog pain score (VAS) by use of a standard 100-mm line at rest, with coughing, and with ambulation. The VAS was determined after extubation and on each postoperative day until discharge or until Day 7. Total doses of epidural ropivacaine, epidural meperidine, and IV opioid were recorded.
The main outcome variable chosen for sample size analysis was the length of hospital stay. Existing audit data from our department were used to estimate SD (1.48), and the difference thought to be clinically significant between the two groups was one postoperative day. Accepting an error of 0.05 and ß error of 0.2, the sample size required was estimated at 37 patients per group (JMP statistical program, version 3.2.1; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Allowing for protocol violations and failures to complete the study, 100 patients were recruited. Data were assessed for normality by using the Shapiro-Wilk W-test and were then analyzed with two-tailed Student’s t-tests, analysis of variance, or Wilcoxon’s ranked sum tests, as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 level.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Fifty patients were enrolled into each group, and data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. A per-protocol analysis was also performed, and 12 patients were excluded from such analysis: 4 failed epidural blocks, 3 surgical complications requiring reoperation (2 GA, 1 TEA), 1 reintubation (TEA) for respiratory failure, and 4 protocol violations (3 GA and 1 TEA). The per-protocol analyses yielded the same results as the corresponding intention-to-treat analyses and have not been presented. Data from low- and high-risk patients are presented together but were also analyzed separately without altering findings.
Patient characteristics and intraoperative course did not differ significantly between the two groups, except that ephedrine requirements were greater and nitroglycerine requirements were smaller in the TEA group (Table 4). Operations performed by each cardiac surgeon were evenly distributed between the two groups. The time to tracheal extubation was significantly shorter in the TEA group (median hours [interquartile range], 3.2 [2.1–4.6] vs 6.7 [3.3–13.2]; P < 0.0001). Three patients required reintubation (one GA and one TEA required surgery for bleeding, and one TEA was reintubated for respiratory distress). The time taken to reach the final mobilization goal (usually two flights of stairs) did not differ between the two groups. The postoperative day on which patients met the criteria for discharge (eligible day of discharge) and the day they were actually discharged were documented and did not differ significantly between the two groups (Table 5). The eligible and actual discharge day differed in 33 patients (18 TEA and 15 GA patients), predominantly because of social reasons. When TEA and GA groups were analyzed together, 24% were discharged on Day 4 and another 33% on Day 5, which contrasts strongly with our hospital’s current average (2% on Day 4 and 18% on Day 5). Of these patients, one patient discharged on Day 5 was readmitted to hospital the next day with nausea and vomiting. Another patient (TEA) discharged on Day 7 was readmitted on Day 9 after a large stroke and died 2 wk later. There were no other readmissions to the hospital within a week of discharge, and there were no other postoperative deaths up to follow-up at 6 mo.
|
|
Analgesia was improved in the TEA group at rest and during coughing, but this was statistically significant only in the first 24 h after surgery (Fig. 1, A and B). The number of patients with a VAS >40 mm during coughing on Day 1 was significantly more in the GA group (16 vs 6 patients, P = 0.015). The VAS for pain during ambulation never differed significantly between the groups. The median VAS in both groups under all conditions was always <30 mm. The morphine requirements (mean [SD]) in the GA group were 36.7 (18.1) mg and 31.4 (28.5) mg for the first and second 24 postoperative hours, respectively. Two patients in the TEA group required IV morphine for pain outside the extent of the epidural block.
|
There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative oxygen saturation on room air, spirometry (Table 6), or changes on chest radiograph. There were also no significant differences in the postoperative levels of creatine kinase MB or troponin I or in the incidence of new Q waves on ECG (one TEA patient and two GA patients). The total duration of ischemia detected by Holter monitoring was 7 times longer in the GA group (823 vs 115.5 min, P = 0.42). However, this was not statistically significant because of the small numbers of patients with ischemia (five GA and three TEA). Twenty-one patients (10 GA and 11 TEA) developed postoperative atrial fibrillation requiring treatment (with digoxin), with no difference in the average onset time (mean, Postoperative Day 2 for both groups).
|
There were no major complications related to the epidural technique, with all patients surviving to discharge. After hospital discharge, two patients (both in the GA group) experienced severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhages requiring readmission to the hospital, endoscopy, and blood transfusion. Both patients had received postoperative oral naproxen. After the second case (after 67 patients had been enrolled), naproxen was discontinued from the trial protocol. There were four TEA patients who did not attain an adequate block at the start of surgery, despite demonstrating a loss of cold sensation to ice with the test dose the evening before surgery. In one patient the catheter had clearly been displaced, and in one other the catheter was found to contain a small amount of blood at the time of removal, suggesting intravascular placement. In the other two, no obvious cause was found. In all four patients, failure of TEA was diagnosed at the induction of anesthesia, and they subsequently received fentanyl and postoperative morphine via PCA by using the GA group protocol. Five patients (three TEA and two GA) developed postoperative urinary retention requiring recatheterization.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Our study demonstrated that tracheal extubation could be achieved earlier by using TEA during and after CABG than by using a fentanyl/propofol-based general anesthetic and postoperative IV morphine analgesia. This occurred despite the majority of the GA group’s being extubated earlier than seven hours after surgery, a time frame consistent with fast-track cardiac anesthesia (14). However, TEA did not result in patients being mobilized any earlier, nor did they meet hospital discharge criteria or leave the hospital earlier.
Kehlet (15) suggests that superior multimodal analgesia, including that provided by epidural local anesthesia and opioids, should allow a more rapid recovery from surgery as long as the postoperative management is organized to take advantage of the patient’s better ability to mobilize, feed, and perform other normal daily activities. We were unable to confirm this theory by use of TEA in CABG, but we believe that our use of the CABG population and our trial design may have limited the possibility of detecting differences in the speed of recovery with TEA. The median VAS for pain in both groups was always <30 mm, a small figure compared with that expected after other types of major surgery; this suggests that pain was well controlled for most patients. There were, however, significantly more patients in the GA group with a VAS >40 mm with coughing, suggesting that in this subset of patients TEA may play an important role in patient comfort. Unfortunately, this subset was too small to analyze possible meaningful effects on respiratory function, myocardial ischemia, or speed of recovery. It is equally important that in our study the care given to the GA group facilitated quick recovery. Most were extubated less than seven hours after surgery, they were mobilized aggressively, their pain scores were low throughout the postoperative period, and most were discharged home on Day 5 or earlier. In those patients in whom the hospital stay was prolonged, analgesia and mobilization were not limiting factors. We opined that it was important when studying the effects of a new analgesic regimen to manage the control group with equal intensity. That approach, however, had the consequence that further improvements would be harder to demonstrate.
It is interesting that the pain scores were significantly different only in the first 24 hours after surgery. In this period after conventional large-dose opioid anesthesia, most patients would still be sedated and require mechanical ventilation. This suggests that in fast-track cardiac anesthesia, TEA may play a more useful role in providing superior analgesia than it would when compared with large-dose opioid anesthesia.
The perioperative changes in spirometry, gas exchange, and changes on chest radiograph between the two groups were not statistically or clinically significant. Previous studies (10,12,13,16,17) have shown small improvements, often reaching statistical significance; however, the improvement in pain scores, when documented, in the TEA patients has been more than that observed in this study. This may account for the discrepancy in respiratory findings. It remains to be shown that improvements in such surrogate markers of respiratory outcome can be translated into a decrease in major pulmonary morbidity. Turfrey et al. (19) attempted to measure the patients’ ability to cooperate with physiotherapy and found an improvement with TEA, and although that was our anecdotal impression, we found it difficult to blind physiotherapists or other health care workers to the treatment group (which we believed would have been important for such a subjective assessment).
Although improvements with TEA have been demonstrated in myocardial ischemia in patients with unstable angina, the etiology and pathophysiology of perioperative ischemia during CABG is different, and the advantages of TEA in this setting are at this stage only theoretical (1–7). Our study showed no differences in the incidence of new Q waves on ECG or in the plasma levels of biochemical markers of myocardial injury. Loick et al. (10) found lower troponin T levels when using TEA for CABG, but we could not reproduce the differences with troponin I, despite a larger sample size. Variability in troponin levels after cardiac surgery can be large and may create difficulties in detecting subtle differences in myocardial protection if they exist. Although it was not statistically significant because the overall incidence was infrequent, we did find the total ischemic time on Holter monitoring to be 7 times shorter in the TEA group. By using a post hoc power analysis (ß = 0.2, = 0.05), we determined that more than 300 patients would be required to reach statistical significance if this trend continued; we believe that this would be a worthwhile area of future investigation, perhaps with a multicenter approach.
There were some methodological problems with the use of length of hospital stay as the main outcome variable. First, length of stay would have been influenced by many factors unrelated to anesthesia or analgesia. However, these would have been evenly distributed between the groups during randomization. Second, the decision to allow hospital discharge was made by the surgical team, who were not blinded to the treatment. We tried to overcome this by using predetermined criteria for hospital discharge and found that irrespective of the actual day of discharge, there was still no difference between the TEA and GA groups in the time taken to meet those discharge criteria. Finally, recruitment into a trial that focused on possible ways to reduce length of hospital stay may have attracted a subset of the general CABG population who were more motivated to recover quickly. This may have made improvements secondary to analgesic technique harder to demonstrate.
There were no major complications related to TEA, and it was well accepted by both patients and staff. The use of TEA during CABG is controversial because the anticoagulation required during surgery raises the concern of increasing the rare but serious risk of permanent spinal cord damage from an epidural hematoma. Such a risk must be balanced by important clinical advantages if the technique is to be justified. The focus of research has been to identify these advantages, but thus far the positive findings have been in surrogate end points, and convincing respiratory, cardiac, or other organ outcome data are lacking. Postoperative analgesia is consistently improved when TEA is used, and this is an important factor for patients when they are asked to consider different anesthetic techniques. Large multicenter outcome studies looking particularly for subgroups of patients who may benefit from superior analgesia (e.g., those at high cardiac or respiratory risk perioperatively) need to be performed. In conclusion, we found that TEA allows earlier tracheal extubation after CABG but does not allow earlier hospital discharge. Good pain relief and aggressive mobilization, when closely managed by a dedicated team, allow most patients to go home on the fourth or fifth postoperative day.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, who donated AUS$30,000.
Medtel Australia loaned the hardware to allow analysis from two Holter monitors (Medilog MR-FD3; Oxford, UK); Abbott Australasia loaned two Abbott Pain Managers to provide epidural PCA.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
- Blomberg S, Emanuelsson H, Kvist H, et al. Effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on coronary arteries and arterioles in patients with coronary artery disease. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 840–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Kirno K, Friberg P, Grzegorczyk A, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia during coronary artery bypass surgery: effects on cardiac sympathetic activity, myocardial blood flow and metabolism, and central hemodynamics. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 1075–81.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Kock M, Blomberg S, Emanuelsson H, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves global and regional left ventricular function during stress-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Anesth Analg 1990; 71: 625–30.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Olausson K, Magnusdottir H, Lurje L, et al. Anti-ischemic and anti-anginal effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia versus those of conventional medical therapy in the treatment of severe refractory unstable angina pectoris. Circulation 1997; 96: 2178–82.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Blomberg SG. Long-term home self-treatment with high thoracic epidural anesthesia in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 413–21.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Liem TH, Booij LHDJ, Hasenbos MAWM, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting using two different anesthetic techniques. I. Hemodynamic effects. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1992; 6: 148–55.
- Stenseth R, Bjella L, Berg EM, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia in aortocoronary bypass surgery. I. Haemodynamic effects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38: 826–33.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Moore CM, Cross MH, Desborough JP, et al. Hormonal effects of thoracic extradural analgesia for cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 387–93.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Stenseth R, Bjella L, Berg EM, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia in aortocoronary bypass surgery. II. Haemodynamic effects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38: 834–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Loick HM, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, et al. High thoracic epidural anesthesia, but not clonidine, attenuates the perioperative stress response via sympatholysis and reduces the release of troponin T in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 701–9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Fawcett WJ, Edwards RE, Quinn AC, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia started after cardiopulmonary bypass: adrenergic, cardiovascular and respiratory sequelae. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 294–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Liem TH, Booij LHDJ, Hasenbos MAWM, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting using two different anesthetic techniques. II. Postoperative outcome. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1992; 6: 156–61.
- Stenseth R, Bjella L, Berg EM, et al. Effects of thoracic epidural analgesia on pulmonary function after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10: 859–65.[Abstract]
- Cheng DCH. Impact of early tracheal extubation on hospital discharge. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1998; 12 (Suppl 2): 35–40.
-
Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 606–17.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Joachimsson P-O, Nystrom S-O, Tyden H. Early extubation after coronary artery surgery in efficiently rewarmed patients: a postoperative comparison of opioid anesthesia versus inhalational anesthesia and thoracic epidural analgesia. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1989; 3: 444–54.[Medline]
- Tenling A, Joachimsson P-O, Tyden H, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia for cardiac surgery: effects on ventilation-perfusion relationships. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1999; 13: 258–64.
- Jain U, Laflamme C, Aggarwal A, et al. Electrocardiographic and hemodynamic changes and their association with myocardial infarction during coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 576–91.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Turfrey DJ, Ray DAA, Sutcliffe NP, et al. Thoracic epidural anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 1090–113.[Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Bouza, M. J. Perez, P. Munoz, C. Rincon, J. M. Barrio, and J. Hortal Response Chest, July 1, 2009; 136(1): 322 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Caputo, H. Alwair, C. A. Rogers, M. Ginty, C. Monk, S. Tomkins, A. Mokhtari, and G. D. Angelini Myocardial, Inflammatory, and Stress Responses in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery With Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1119 - 1126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Popping, N. Elia, E. Marret, C. Remy, and M. R. Tramer Protective Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal and Thoracic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis Arch Surg, October 1, 2008; 143(10): 990 - 999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Ronald, K. A. AbdulAziz, T. George Day, and M. Scott In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia combined with general anaesthesia results in faster recovery and fewer complications but does not affect length of hospital stay Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 207 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Chaney Intrathecal and Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia for Cardiac Surgery Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 45 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. F. Olivier, N. Le, J. L. Choiniere, I. Prieto, F. Basile, and T. Hemmerling Comparison of three different epidural solutions in off-pump cardiac surgery: pilot study Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2005; 95(5): 685 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Barrington, R. Kluger, R. Watson, D. A. Scott, and K. J. Harris Epidural Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Compared with General Anesthesia Alone Does Not Reduce Biochemical Markers of Myocardial Damage Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2005; 100(4): 921 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. S. Myles and D. McIlroy Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia: Choice of Anesthetic Agents and Techniques Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 5 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Djaiani, L. Fedorko, and W. S. Beattie Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Friend or A Foe? Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 87 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Weissman Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 185 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Rosen, D. W. Hawkinberry II, K. R. Rosen, R. A. Gustafson, J. P. Hogg, and L. M. Broadman An Epidural Hematoma in an Adolescent Patient After Cardiac Surgery Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 966 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. M. Schwann and M. A. Chaney No pain, much gain? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2003; 126(5): 1261 - 1264. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. C.Y. Lu, A. D. Grayson, P. Jha, A. K. Srinivasan, and B. M. Fabri Risk factors for sternal wound infection and mid-term survival following coronary artery bypass surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 943 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Schachner, J. Bonatti, D. Balogh, J. Margreiter, P. Mair, G. Laufer, and G. Putz Aortic valve replacement in the conscious patient under regional anesthesia without endotracheal intubation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1526 - 1527. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
