JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prys-Roberts, C.
Right arrow Articles by Godet, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prys-Roberts, C.
Right arrow Articles by Godet, G.
Anesth Analg 2002;94:767-768
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Withdrawal of Antihypertensive Drugs Before Anesthesia

Cedric Prys-Roberts

Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK

To the Editor:

Over the past 10 yr, a number of articles in this and other journals have identified hemodynamic problems during anesthesia in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (15) and angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists (6,7). The most recent article by Bertrand et al. (8) was well designed to study the differences in blood pressures during induction and early maintenance of anesthesia between patients who had their AT1 receptor antagonists withdrawn before surgery and those who did not. On the basis of their findings related to "severe hypotensive episodes," the authors fall short of making an explicit recommendation but suggest that "Recommendations to discontinue these drugs on the day before surgery may be justified" (italics mine). Whose recommendations? The recommendations to which they refer in their opening paragraph relate to ACE inhibitors (13).

I do not question the authors’ conclusions based on their arterial blood pressure findings (8), although a glance at Figure 1 in their article will reveal that the differences between the two groups, although statistically significant at only three points, are relatively small. This article provides the reader with no data on heart rate, and therein lies the question. Analysis of their previous articles (6,7) reveals that the hypotensive episodes after induction of anesthesia were associated with marked bradycardia of greater severity in patients receiving angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists (46 ± 5 bpm) than in those receiving ß-adrenoceptor or calcium antagonists or ACE inhibitors (7). Such decreases in heart rate may contribute substantially to the degree of arterial hypotension specified in this article. The experimental program for this study required the administration of ephedrine to all patients. Ephedrine exerts a direct ß12 adrenoceptor agonist effect that would have increased heart rate in their angiotensin receptor antagonist group but to a much less extent in patients receiving ß-adrenoceptor antagonists.

Induction of anesthesia in these patients commenced with a substantial dose of sufentanil (0.4 to 0.5 µg/kg) followed by propofol (1.5 mg/kg). Both these drugs exert central vagotonicity (9,10) and their effects are probably additive (11). It would therefore be more appropriate, especially in an elderly group of patients (mean age between 68 and 71 yr in these studies) to use a prophylactic dose of glycopyrrolate to prevent the bradycardia and ameliorate the arterial hypotension (12).

Before I retired from clinical practice, I anesthetized over many years a number of patients receiving ACE inhibitors, and three patients treated with an AT1 receptor antagonist (Losartan), for the treatment of hypertension and/or congestive cardiac failure. In every case I gave IV glycopyrrolate (x mg) 2 min before induction of anesthesia with fentanyl 5 mg/kg and propofol 0.75–1.0 mg/kg. In no patient did I observe a serious degree of hypotension (SBP <100 mm Hg) or profound bradycardia (HR <60 bpm).

Because these authors have only used one anesthetic induction technique that is highly vagotonic, we cannot judge whether other techniques might produce lesser degrees of hypotension inpatients treated with ACE inhibitors or AT1 receptor antagonists. Before Bertrand and her colleagues recommend withdrawal of these antihypertensive drugs before induction of anesthesia, I would respectfully suggest that they perform a study to test the hypothesis that I have proposed—that prophylactic glycopyrrolate would minimize both bradycardia and arterial hypotension to such an extent that it would not be necessary to withdraw these drugs before anesthesia and surgery.

References

  1. Mirenda JV, Grissom TE. Anesthetic implications of the renin-angiotensin system and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 667–83.[Free Full Text]
  2. Colson P, Saussine M, Seguin JR, et al. Hemodynamic effects of anesthesia in patients chronically treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 805–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Coriat P, Richer C, Douraki T, et al. Influence of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on anesthetic induction. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 299–307.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Ryckwaert F, Colson P. Hemodynamic effects of anesthesia in patients with ischemic heart failure chronically treated with angiotensin-converting inhibitors. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 945–9.[Abstract]
  5. Eyraud D, Mouren S, Teugels K, et al. Treating anesthesia-induced hypotension by angiotensin II in patients chronically treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 259–63.[Abstract]
  6. Eyraud D, Brabant S, Nathalie D, et al. Treatment of intraoperative refractory hypotension with terlipressin in patients chronically treated with an antagonist of the renin-angiotensin system. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 980–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Brabant SM, Bertrand M, Eyraud D, et al. The hemodynamic effects of anesthetic induction in vascular surgical patients chronically treated with angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1388–92.
  8. Bertrand M, Godet G, Meersschaert K, et al. Should angiotensin II antagonists be discontinued before surgery? Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 26–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Cullen PM, Turtle M, Prys-Roberts C, et al. Effect of propofol anesthesia on baroreflex activity in humans. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 115–20.
  10. Reitan JA, Stengert KB, Wymore ML, Martucci RW. Central vagal control of fentanyl-induced bradycardia during halothane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1978; 57: 31–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Vuyk J, Mertens MJ, Olofsen E, et al. Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection: determination of optimal EC50–EC95 propofol-opioid concentrations that assure adequate anesthesia and a rapid return of consciousness. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1549–62.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Skues M, Richards MJ, Jarvis AP, Prys-Roberts C. Preinduction atropine or glycopyrrolate hemodynamic changes associated with induction and maintenance of anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. Anesth Analg 1989; 69: 386–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

 

Response

Gilles Godet

Pitié Hospital, Paris, France

In Response:

We thank Pr Cedric Prys-Roberts, whose great experience in anesthesia of hypertensive patients is well known, for his interest concerning our recent article (1).

We reported on a short series of patients, results that focused on the possible interest to withdrawn angiotensin II antagonist (AIIA) on the day before a regular surgery. When given preoperatively, these drugs are associated with a risk of hypotension during induction of anesthesia and have possible detrimental effects on cerebral and coronary perfusion in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. We agree with Pr Cedric Prys-Roberts concerning the small difference in arterial blood pressure (AP) between both groups; however, we need to give terlipressin in 6 of the 15 patients with AIIA because a refractory hypotension deserves emphasis. Moreover, maintaining stable hemodynamics is a main goal for anesthesiologists in charge of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Concerning our study, we should have reported results concerning heart rate (HR). In fact, HR was always (but insignificantly) the slowest in patients from whom AIIA had been withdrawn. This result is confirmed by the findings of the equal dose of ephedrine used in both groups and the largest dose of neosynephrine in patients receiving AIIA, both speaking for an absence of bradycardia in patients with AIIA given.

Glycopyrrolate prevents bradycardia and hypotension during induction of anesthesia using propofol and sufentanil (2). However, one must note that results of several studies concerning glycopyrrolate are not clear. McCubbin et al. (3) reported the smallest increase in heart rate in comparison with atropine, with no change in AP in both groups. Yet, Skues et al. (1) reported that during anesthesia with propofol (1 mg/kg) and alfentanil, the increase in AP was largest in comparison with atropine; HR did not change. Finally, Sneyd and Mayall (4) reported an increase of HR without decrease in AP during anesthesia with propofol (1.7 mg/kg) in patients having a mean age of 77 yr. Obviously, examination of glycopyrrolate during anesthesia with propofol in patients from whom AIIA are withdrawn would be useful. Unfortunately, this drug is not available in France. However, we think that tachycardia is always more deleterious in patients with coronary disease in comparison with bradycardia.

In conclusion, discontinuing AIIA on the day before carotid endarterectomy seems to avoid hypotension during induction of anesthesia with propofol without detrimental effects.

References

  1. Bertrand M, Godet G, Meersschaert K, et al. Should the angiotensin II antagonists be discontinued before surgery? Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 26–30.
  2. Skues MA, Richards MJ, Jarvis AP, Prys-Roberts C. Preinduction atropine or glycopyrrolate and hemodynamic changes associated with induction and maintenance of anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. Anesth Analg 1989; 69: 386–90.
  3. McCubbin TD, Brown JH, Dewar KM, et al. Glycopyrrolate as a premedicant: comparison with atropine. Br J Anaest 1979; 51: 885–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sneyd JR, Mayall R. The effect of pre-induction glycopyrronium on the haemodynamic response of elderly patients to anesthesia with propofol. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 620–1.[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prys-Roberts, C.
Right arrow Articles by Godet, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prys-Roberts, C.
Right arrow Articles by Godet, G.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press