| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Bethesda, MD
To the Editor:
Using multiple regression analysis, Robson et al. (1) were unable to show a significant correlation between jugular bulb oxyhemoglobin desaturation and neurologic/cognitive outcomes at 3 mo in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Although this was a noninterventional trial, the authors neglected to address a serious flaw in study design that has been identified previously in this (2) and other settings (3): regression to the mean (RTM).
RTM is a statistical finding masquerading as a real one (4). To illustrate, consider a population selected at random in whom systemic blood pressure is measured at time zero and again at 3 mo. If the individuals found to be hypertensive are prescribed medical treatment, their blood pressure at 3 mo will be closer to the mean of the entire populationeven if they fail to take their medicationowing to RTM (5,6). Individuals with the highest values at time zero will show the greatest reductions, whereas the decline in those with values closer to the mean will be much smaller. The converse is observed when initial blood pressures are less than the population mean.
Yudkin and Stratton (4) propose some approaches to minimizing RTM, such as randomized controlled trials (in which any difference in response between the two groups will exclude RTM) and basing selection on the mean of several (e.g., four) measurements at each time point, rather than a single value.
Future studies exploring neurological outcome after open-heart surgery should address RTM in their design.
Footnotes
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. P. Alston, I. J. Deary, M. J. Robson, P. J. Andrews, and M. J. Souter Another Example of Regression to the Mean (Not) Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1823 - 1823. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|