JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by James, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by James, R.

Anesth Analg 2002;94:1673
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Evidence-Based EACA Dosing?

John C. Lundell, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center, San Antonio, TX

To the Editor:

I read with great interest the clinical investigation by Butterworth et al. (1) as well as the previous article by the same investigators (2). These articles are have begun to address the paucity of scientific evidence to guide dosing of {epsilon}-aminocaproic acid (EACA) for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. I wondered why the authors give EACA after heparinization rather than before incision, as is common practice. Is there any science behind this decision? What would the predicted levels be in the Butterworth et al. model if the initial dose of EACA were given prior to incision? Would this change the load and infusion recommended to achieve the desired blood concentration of the drug?

References

  1. Butterworth J, James RL, Lin Y, et al. Gender does not influence epsilon-aminocaproic acid concentrations in adults undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1384–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Butterworth J, James RL, Lin Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics of e-aminocaproic acid in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1624–35.[Web of Science][Medline]

 

Response

John Butterworth, MD, and Robert James, MS MStat

Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC

In Response:

We thank Major Lundell for his query. It does make a difference in the blood concentrations of {epsilon}-aminocaproic acid (EACA) when the loading dose is initiated at a time other than the one described in our protocol (1). Clinicians who wish to begin administration of EACA at the time of induction of anesthesia have two convenient options if they wish to maintain blood EACA concentrations at or above 260 mg/L. The first would be to administer a loading dose of 80 mg/kg over 20 min and a maintenance infusion of 30 mg · kg-1 · h-1. A simulation of this dosing scheme is provided in Figure 1. A second option would be to administer a 60 mg/kg loading dose over 20 min, a 30 mg · kg-1 · h-1 maintenance infusion, and a 10 mg/kg dose in the priming solution of the cardiopulmonary bypass pump. This dosing scheme is simulated in Figure 2. We assumed an 80-kg patient, a 45-min time interval before extracorporeal circulation, a 2-h bypass run, and termination of the EACA infusion 4 h after induction of anesthesia in both of the simulations.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Simulation of {epsilon}-aminocaproic acid concentrations in blood after a loading dose of 80 mg/kg given over 20 min and a maintenance infusion of 30 mg · kg-1 · h-1 given for 4 h.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Simulation of {epsilon}-aminocaproic acid concentrations in blood after administration of a 60 mg/kg loading dose over 20 min, a 30 mg · kg-1 · h-1 maintenance infusion given for 4 h, and a 10 mg/kg dose in the priming solution of the cardiopulmonary bypass pump.

 
References

  1. Butterworth J, James RL, Lin YA, et al. Gender does not influence epsilon-aminocaproic acid concentrations in adults undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1384–90.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by James, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by James, R.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press