JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peuch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Laudenbach, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peuch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Laudenbach, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Right arrow Pediatrics
Right arrow Airway

Anesth Analg 2002;95:333-335
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA

Separate-Lung Ventilation Strategy for Reimplantation of Esophageal Bronchus

Clarisse Peuch, MD*, Serge Malbezin, MD*, Carole Saizou, MD{dagger}, Vincent Couloigner, MD{ddagger}, Monique Elmaleh, MD§, Yves Nivoche, MD*, Pascal de Lagausie, MD||, and Vincent Laudenbach, MDPhD*

Departments of *Anesthesiology, {dagger}Pediatric Intensive Care, {ddagger}ENT Surgery, §Radiology, and ||Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Vincent Laudenbach, MD, Départment d’Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Robert Debré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 48 Blvd. Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France. Address e-mail to vlaudenb{at}infobiogen.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 

IMPLICATIONS: We describe an original ventilation method designed to optimize lung recruitment and gas exchanges during surgery in a newborn with congenital esophageal atresia and ectopic esophageal implantation of the left mainstem bronchus. This strategy ensured constant adaptation of the mechanical ventilatory regimen to the surgical procedure-linked constraints.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
Esophageal atresia (EA) usually requires neonatal surgery. Rarely, EA is associated with esophageal bronchus (13). In such situations, recurrent infections occur in lung territories depending on the ectopic bronchus. These result in progressive destruction of the parenchyma, of which resection may be mandatory, subsequently impairing thoracic development (3,4). Alternatively, conservative treatment (i.e., correction of the abnormal airway) may be proposed (5). Such procedures raise challenging issues regarding intraoperative ventilatory support. We report a case of successful reimplantation of an esophageal left bronchus revealed after EA repair.


    Case Report
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
A 1.7-kg boy of 34 wk gestational age was admitted to the surgical ward for EA. A chest radiogram showed normal recruitment of both lungs and aeration of the gastrointestinal tract evocative of distal tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF; Type III EA) (Fig. 1A). A surgical procedure was planned. Endotracheal intubation was performed without difficulty by using a 2.5-mm-internal-diameter (ID) cuffless tube. Bilateral lung auscultation showed symmetrical ventilation. A right thoracotomy was performed, allowing ligation of a carinal TEF and completion of a one-stage esophageal anastomosis. After transfer to the intensive care unit, a chest radiogram revealed atelectasis of the left lung (Fig. 1B). Nonetheless, adequate oxygenation was ensured by low inspired oxygen fractions (0.25–0.3), suggesting limitation of intrapulmonary shunt by potent hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. A tracheobronchoscopy showed complete obstruction of the origin of the left mainstem bronchus, as well as a stenosis of both the distal trachea and the proximal right mainstem bronchus. A chest computer-assisted tomography scan displayed 1) a left mainstem bronchus of atypical cephalocaudal orientation, the origin of which appeared more cephalic than the one of the right mainstem bronchus; 2) a tracheal stenosis; and 3) close contact between the esophagus and the lumen of the left mainstem bronchus (Fig. 2). The lung vasculature appeared normal after contrast injection. The esophageal implantation of the left bronchus was assessed by combined opacification of the tracheal and gastrointestinal tracts (Fig. 3). Although tracheobronchography confirmed stenosis of the trachea and right mainstem bronchus, surrounding a normal right bronchial tree, it failed to opacify the left mainstem bronchus (Fig. 3A). However, the contrast swallow showed a left bronchogram, associated with persistent lung atelectasis (Fig. 3B). Reimplantation of the ectopic bronchus was planned. Right thoracotomy appeared appropriate, providing adequate exposition of the operating field. Yet it was exposed to intraoperative hypoxia because of the manual reclination of the right lung required for surgical access, combined with the anatomical exclusion of the left lung. Therefore, a separate-lung ventilation strategy was planned.



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plain chest radiographs. A, Neonatal film, suggestive of Type III esophageal atresia (EA). Note the tip of the esophageal suction tube (arrow), indicating the lower extremity of the upper esophagus. B, Postoperative film (first surgical procedure), revealing complete atelectasis of the left lung after correction of EA.

 


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Chest computer-assisted tomography scans. Note the reduced lumen of the right mainstem bronchus (white arrow) and the close contact between the esophagus (black arrow) and the left mainstem bronchus (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Opacification of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. A, Tracheobronchogram showing a stenosis of both the distal trachea and the origin of the right mainstem bronchus (arrow) and the absence of opacification of the left mainstem bronchus. B, Esophagogram, revealing the esophageal implantation of the left mainstem bronchus (arrowheads).

 
In addition to right-lung ventilation via an endotracheal 2.5-mm-ID tube, located beyond the tracheal and right mainstem bronchus stenosis, a second 2.5-mm-ID tube was introduced into the left bronchus through the upper esophagus under radioscopic control (Fig. 4). Both tubes were initially connected to the same ventilator (Aestiva 3000, pressure-control mode; Datex-Ohmeda, Helsinki, Finland). The following variables were set: frequency, 50 breaths/min; inspiratory/expiratory ratio, 1:2; peak inspiratory pressure, 20–25 cm H2O; peak end-expiratory pressure, 5 cm H2O; and fraction of inspired oxygen, 0.5–1. After the left bronchus was disconnected from the esophagus, the first left bronchial tube was removed. The bronchus was then directly catheterized in the operating field. The second left bronchial tube was connected to another ventilator, and lung recruitment was visually controlled by the surgeon. The initial variables for left lung ventilation were frequency, 50 breaths/min; inspiratory/expiratory ratio, 1:2; peak inspiratory pressure, 30 cm H2O; peak end-expiratory pressure, 8 cm H2O; and fraction of inspired oxygen, 1. The right lung was ventilated during the whole surgical procedure. The total tidal volume did not exceed 10 mL/kg body weight. Pulse oximetry showed values >90% throughout the procedure, except during the anastomosis of the left bronchus with the trachea. ETCO2 could not be reliably monitored because of frequent maneuvers on the airway, subsequently altering gas sampling quality and the ETCO2/PaCO2 gradient. Therefore, we performed repeated blood gas measurements. To shorten the delay of left lung exclusion, the tracheobronchial anastomosis was prepared by dissecting the edges and placing sutures before the removal of the left bronchial tube, so that they could be tightened rapidly. The left bronchus was successfully reimplanted orthotopically. After anastomosis was completed, the endotracheal tube was relocated from the right mainstem bronchus above the carina, allowing bilateral lung ventilation. The patient was kept under mechanical ventilatory support until his trachea was definitely extubated at 32 days of age. He was discharged home at 75 days.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Second surgical procedure: intraoperative chest roentgenogram, showing separate recruitment of both lungs via an endotracheal tube (right-lung ventilation; arrow) and, on the other hand, a left bronchial tube introduced through the esophagus (arrowheads).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
Various, albeit rare, congenital communicating bronchopulmonary foregut malformations have been described (13). Such features must be considered when planning neonatal surgery for EA (3,6,7). However, in the case of our patient, several elements suggested a iatrogenic origin after the first surgical procedure, i.e., accidental anastomosis of the upper esophagus to both the inferior esophageal segment and the left mainstem bronchus, which were previously in close contact via the carinal TEF. These elements were 1) the normal aeration of both lungs immediately after birth, 2) the symmetrical ventilation after initial intubation, and 3) the location of tracheal and right mainstem bronchus stenosis at the level of the carina. Indeed, the usual exposure for primary repair of EA hardly allows clear and global visualization of the left bronchus.

Neonatal reimplantation of ectopic bronchus is associated with frequent mortality because of oxygenation failure or associated anomalies (7,8). The absence of recruitment in lung territories, depending on the ectopic bronchus, results in intrapulmonary shunt and impaired CO2 clearance. Respiratory homeostasis control may warrant high-volume, possibly deleterious, ventilation of a single lung. In this case, separate-lung ventilation ensured adequate gas exchanges throughout the surgical procedure. Although high-pressure regimens were imposed by surgical maneuvers upon the lungs and airway, separate recruitment of both lungs allowed independent adaptation of ventilation in response to specific constraints, e.g., thoracic roll or retractors.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Usui N, Kamata S, Ishikawa S, et al. Anomalies of the tracheobronchial tree in patients with esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 258–62. [ISI][Medline]
  2. Srikanth MS, Ford EG, Stanley P, Mahour GH. Communicating bronchopulmonary foregut malformations: classification and embryogenesis. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27: 732–6. [ISI][Medline]
  3. Leithiser RE Jr, Capitanio MA, Macpherson RI, et al. "Communicating" bronchopulmonary foregut malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146: 227–31. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lallemand D, Quignodon JF, Courtel JV. The anomalous origin of bronchus from the esophagus: report of three cases. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26: 179–82. [ISI][Medline]
  5. Michel JL, Revillon Y, Salakos C, et al. Successful bronchotracheal reconstruction in esophageal bronchus: two case reports. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32: 739–42. [ISI][Medline]
  6. Jamieson DH, Fisher RM. Communicating bronchopulmonary foregut malformation associated with esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula. Pediatr Radiol 1993; 23: 557–8. [ISI][Medline]
  7. Saydam TC, Mychaliska GB, Harrison MR. Esophageal lung with multiple congenital anomalies: conundrums in diagnosis and management. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 615–8. [ISI][Medline]
  8. Usui N, Kamata S, Ishikawa S, et al. Bronchial reconstruction for bronchopulmonary foregut malformation: a case report. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30: 1495–7. [ISI][Medline]
Accepted for publication March 26, 2002.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peuch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Laudenbach, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peuch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Laudenbach, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Right arrow Pediatrics
Right arrow Airway


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press