JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. B.

Anesth Analg 2003;96:629
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

A Misleading Conclusion and Abstract

Bee Beng Lee, FANZCA, FHKCA, FHKAM

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China, Dr. Kopacz does not wish to respond.

To the Editor:

I was concerned to read the discrepancy between the actual results obtained and the conclusion reached by Kopacz et al. (1) in their paper published in your journal. In their Results section, the authors reported, "There were no differences in plasma concentrations of local anesthetic in patients who received plain levobupivacaine compared with patients in the epinephrine-containing groups. . .." In accordance, they stated that "statistical significance was not reached for any of these measures" at the beginning of their Discussion. However, they then proceeded to conclude, "The addition of epinephrine decreases plasma local anesthetic levels . . .." My greatest concern is the statement in their Abstract that "peak serum levobupivacaine levels were reduced. . .." As many readers, especially those searching for information on Medline, read only the abstracts, may I suggest that the authors should perhaps issue an erratum to the conclusion that they actually reported in the Abstract to read: "Peak serum levobupivacaine levels were not significantly reduced. . .." to concur with the findings in their Results.

Reference

  1. Kopacz DJ, Helman JD, Nussbaum CE, et al. A comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.5% with or without epinephrine for lumbar spine surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 755–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. B.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press