JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babik, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hantos, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babik, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hantos, Z.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Monitoring (Cardiac)
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)

Anesth Analg 2003;96:1280-1287
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Changes in Respiratory Mechanics During Cardiac Surgery

Barna Babik, MD*,{dagger}, Tibor Asztalos, PhD{ddagger}, Ferenc Peták, PhD{ddagger}, Zoltán I. Deák, MD*,{dagger}, and Zoltán Hantos, PhD{ddagger}

*Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, {dagger}Division of Cardiac Surgery, and {ddagger}Department of Medical Informatics and Engineering, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Zoltán Hantos, PhD, Department of Medical Informatics and Engineering, University of Szeged, PO Box 427, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary. Address e-mail to hantos{at}dmi.u-szeged.hu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
We investigated the role of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in compromised lung function associated with cardiac surgery. Low-frequency respiratory impedance (Zrs) was measured in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with (n = 30; CPB group) or without (n = 29; off-pump coronary artery bypass [OPCAB] group) CPB. Another group of CPB patients received dopamine (DA) (n = 12; CPB-DA group). Extravascular lung water was determined in five CPB subjects. Zrs was measured before skin incision and after chest closure. Airway resistance and inertance and tissue damping and elastance were determined from Zrs data. Airway resistance increased in the CPB group (74.9% ± 20.8%; P < 0.05), whereas it did not change in the OPCAB group (11.8% ± 7.9%; not significant) and even decreased in the CPB-DA patients (-40.6% ± 9.2%; P < 0.05). Tissue damping increased in the CPB and OPCAB groups, whereas it remained constant in the CPB-DA patients. Significant increases in elastance were observed in all groups. There was no difference in extravascular lung water before and after CPB, suggesting that edema did not develop. These results indicate a significant and heterogeneous airway narrowing during CPB, which was counteracted by the administration of DA. The mild deterioration in tissue mechanics, reflecting partial closure of the airways, may be a consequence of the anesthesia itself.

IMPLICATIONS: We observed that cardiopulmonary bypass deteriorates lung function by inducing a heterogeneous airway constriction, whereas no such effects were observed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery without bypass. The impairment in parenchymal mechanics, which was obtained in both groups, may result from peripheral airway closure and/or be a consequence of mediator release.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Lung function is affected by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during cardiac surgery. The causes of the impairment are multifactorial and include the accumulation of extravascular fluid resulting from alterations in the alveolar-capillary membrane (1), alveolar collapse (2,3), a decrease in functional residual capacity (FRC) (4), retention of airway secretion, or insufficient cough as a consequence of pain. Although pulmonary dysfunction entails not only an impaired gas exchange, but also deteriorated respiratory mechanics (5–9), inconsistent findings have been reported about the overall effect of CPB on the mechanical properties of the respiratory system.

Whereas studies involving use of the end-inflation occlusion technique (10) have revealed consistent increases in respiratory elastance (Ers) (7–9,11,12), the findings relating to changes in the end-inspiratory airway (Rmin) or tissue resistances (Rti) after CPB are far less uniform. Rmin or Rti has been reported to be decreased (5) or unchanged (8,12) after CPB, whereas CPB leads to the onset of an intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), indicating an increase in airway resistance (Raw) (9,11,13). Furthermore, measurements made in the frequency and tidal volume ranges of normal breathing have revealed increases in pulmonary elastance and resistance after CPB (14,15), whereas these adverse changes were not observed with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (OPCAB) (15).

Studies in which the respiratory or lung impedance is partitioned into airway and tissue components allow an evaluation of the responses of the respiratory tissues to various stimuli (16–19). Because the airway and tissue mechanical responses may dissociate (17), the changes (or the lack of response) in the overall mechanical variables may lead to false conclusions concerning the mechanical status of the respiratory system and the loci of the changes. The goal of this study was to characterize the effects of CPB on the airway and tissue mechanics separately. We compared the changes in the mechanical properties of the airways and respiratory tissues in three groups of anesthetized, paralyzed patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery, not using CPB or using CPB, with or without the administration of dopamine (DA). The study groups were designed to form homogeneous cohorts regarding the anesthetic management, in particular the administration of bronchoactive drugs (adrenoreceptor agonists, volatile anesthetics, calcium channel blockers, and so on). The airway and tissue mechanical properties were separated via a model-based evaluation of the low-frequency respiratory impedance spectra (Zrs) (16–19). In an attempt to characterize the underlying mechanisms responsible for the changes in respiratory mechanics, we measured the amount of extravascular lung water (EVLW) (19) in a smaller cohort of the study population before and after CPB.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
The study protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Szeged University, and informed consent was obtained from the subjects. Seventy-one adult patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were studied. On the basis of surgical considerations, CPB and cardiac arrest were used in 30 patients (CPB group), whereas in another 29 patients OPCAB was performed (OPCAB group). The patients in these groups received no ß-adrenergic agonists. In 12 additional CPB patients, dopamine (DA) (3–7 µg · kg-1 · min-1) was administered as indicated by the general cardiopulmonary status during the surgery; these patients were included in a third group (CPB-DA group). Table 1 presents the demographic and anthropometric characteristics, and Table 2 lists the clinical data on the patients. Inclusion criteria for the investigations were 1) stable angina pectoris due to coronary artery disease; 2) a left ventricular ejection fraction >45%; 3) a left ventricular end-diastolic pressure <15 mm Hg; 4) no coexisting renal, hepatic, or cerebrovascular diseases; and 5) no previous cardiac or thoracic surgery.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic, Anthropometric, and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Anesthesiological and Surgical Characteristics of the Patients
 
All patients were premedicated IM with morphine (0.1 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) 45 min before surgery. Anesthesia was induced with IV doses of fentanyl (5–10 mg/kg), midazolam (0.05–0.1 mg/kg), and propofol (1–2 mg/kg). Neuromuscular paralysis was achieved with pipecuronium (0.1 mg/kg). The trachea was intubated with an 8.0- or 9.0-mm-inner diameter cuffed endotracheal (ET) tube (Portex, Hythe, UK). Anesthesia was maintained with additional doses of fentanyl and propofol (25–100 mcg · min-1 · kg-1), as required by the clinical condition. Additional doses of pipecuronium were given when needed. Anticoagulation was provided by heparin (300 U/kg in the CBP group and 150 U/kg in the OPCAB group). In the CPB group, the membrane oxygenator was primed with 1500 mL of crystalloid fluid (lactated Ringer’s solution); moderate hypothermia was routinely induced (30°C esophageal temperature) at the beginning of CPB. In all patients, transrespiratory pressure, end-tidal CO2 concentration, and the fraction of oxygen in the inspired air were displayed on a monitor (Siemens Servo Computer module, Type 990; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden) attached to the respirator. Arterial and venous blood gases were determined (ABLTM; Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark).

The patients were ventilated with a Siemens Servo 900C ventilator (Siemens-Elema) in volume-controlled, constant-flow mode by setting the inspiratory/expiratory ratio to ~1:3 and the end-inspiratory pause to 10% of the total cycle and by applying a PEEP of 2 cm H2O. A fraction of oxygen in the inspired air of 0.5–0.8 and a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg were applied, and the ventilatory frequency was adjusted to maintain a normal PaCO2 level. In the CPB group, mechanical ventilation was stopped during cardioplegic cardiac arrest without applying a positive airway pressure. Before the declamping of the aorta, the lungs were inflated three to five times to a peak airway pressure of 30 cm H2O to facilitate the removal of gas emboli from the heart and to reexpand the lungs. Ventilation was restored before the patient was weaned from CPB. To exclude the potential biasing effects of positive inotropic drugs, the patients in the major study populations were selected so that no such drugs were involved.

In a small cohort of the CPB group (n = 5), a transpulmonary arterial thermodilution system (PiCCO; Pulsion Medical System, Munich, Germany) was used to measure EVLW (20). A fiberoptic thermistor catheter was inserted into the femoral artery. The thermal indicator bolus was injected into the right atrium via a central venous catheter. The monitor determined the mean transit time of the thermal indicator and calculated EVLW. EVLW and Zrs were measured at the same time.

The equipment used for the impedance measurements (Fig. 1) is a modification of the low-frequency forced-oscillation setup applied in animal experiments (16,17). Two collapsible latex tube segments (A and B) were clamped alternately to switch the ET tube from the respirator to the oscillatory device and back as follows: during mechanical ventilation, A was open and B was closed. Before the oscillatory measurements, the lungs were inflated to a pressure of approximately 30 cm H2O to standardize the volume history. Segment B was then opened for a few ventilatory cycles before data acquisition to equilibrate the pressures in the lungs and the loudspeaker chambers. In the resulting apneic period, small-amplitude (<1 cm H2O) pseudorandom pressure excitations were introduced into the trachea. The forcing signal contained 30 integer-multiple components of the fundamental frequency 0.2 Hz, in the frequency range 0.2–6 Hz.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Measurement setup. A and B denote collapsible segments. PTG = pneumotachograph; PaO = airway opening pressure; Ptr = tracheal pressure; {image} = tracheal flow.

 
Tracheal flow ({image}) was measured with a 28-mm-inner diameter screen pneumotachograph connected to a differential pressure transducer (ICS Model 33NA002D; ICSensors, Miltipas, CA). To exclude the ET tube impedance from our measurements, we measured tracheal pressure (Ptr) with an identical pressure transducer through a 1.5-mm-outer diameter polyethylene catheter furnished with several lateral holes at the tip that was positioned 1.5–2 cm over the distal end of the ET tube.

Four to 6 recordings, each 15 s long, were collected at end-expiration, both immediately before the skin incision and at the end of the operation, just before removal of the surgical preparation. At least 2-min periods of mechanical ventilation were interposed between the successive Zrs measurements. The electrical signals of the transducers were low-pass filtered at 25 Hz and digitized at a rate of 256 Hz by the analog-to-digital board of a personal computer. The transfer function between the transducers was determined by exposing the sensors with their connecting tubing to the same oscillatory pressure fluctuation, to take into account the differences in the frequency responses and to correct the impedances accordingly.

The mechanical impedance of the respiratory system was calculated from the Ptr and {image} signals (Zrs = Ptr/{image}). The impedance spectra were calculated by fast Fourier transformation by using a 5-s time window and 95% overlapping. The impedance curves were ensemble-averaged for each patient and condition.

At low oscillation frequencies, the airways and the parenchyma exhibit distinctly different frequency dependencies, which allows the separation of the mechanical properties of the two compartments (16–19). The airways can be described by a frequency-independent Raw and airway inertance (Iaw), whereas both the parenchymal resistance and reactance change roughly inversely with increasing frequency (16–19). These characteristics can be used to separate the airway and parenchymal properties by fitting a model containing a frequency-independent Raw and Iaw connected in series with a constant-phase tissue compartment (16) representing tissue damping (G) and elastance (H): equation


where Rrs and Xrs are the respiratory resistance and reactance, respectively; j is the imaginary unit; {omega} is the angular frequency; and {alpha} is expressed as {alpha} = 2/{pi} arctan(H/G). The model was fitted to each impedance spectrum by minimizing the absolute differences between the measured and the modeled impedance data. Impedance data points coinciding with the heart rate and its harmonics had low reproducibility and were therefore excluded from the model fit. Tissue hysteresivity ({eta}) values were calculated as {eta} = G/H (21).

The values are reported as means ± SE. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test data for normality. Two-way repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with the presence or absence of CPB as the first variable and the time of the measurement (before or after the surgery) as the second variable were used to estimate the effects of CPB on the mechanical conditions of the lungs. Another two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, with the administration of DA as the first factor and the time of the measurement as the second factor, was applied to assess the effect of DA on the changes in lung mechanics during surgery. Pairwise comparisons were performed by using Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison procedures. Statistical significance was accepted at the P < 0.05 level.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
The real (Rrs) and the imaginary (Xrs) parts of the Zrs spectra measured in a representative patient before and after surgery, together with the corresponding model fits, are depicted in Figure 2. The small variations in the Zrs data indicate the high reproducibility of the measurements. Larger deviations in the impedance measurements can be seen only at frequencies coinciding with the heart rate or its harmonics. The Rrs curves exhibit a sharp descending course representing the frequency-dependent viscous resistance of the respiratory tissues, whereas the plateau approached at higher frequencies corresponds to the flow resistance of the airways. The quasi-hyperbolic increase in Xrs in the low-frequency range reflects the elastic properties of the respiratory tissues, and the small Iaw of the lower respiratory system contributes to the Xrs data only at higher frequencies. The changes in the frequency-dependent behavior of the Zrs spectra indicate that cardiac surgery involving CPB increased the impedance of the respiratory tissues, and the increases in Rrs at higher frequencies suggest a marked increase in Raw. The model fitted the Zrs data well, and no systematic fitting error was detected.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Real (respiratory resistance; Rrs) and imaginary (respiratory reactance; Xrs) parts of the respiratory input impedance in a representative patient before (circles) and after (squares) cardiopulmonary bypass. Symbols with bars represent mean and SD values obtained from four to six consecutive measurements. Lines indicate the corresponding model fits. Open symbols indicate data points that were excluded from the model fits because of corruption by cardiac artifacts.

 
The airway and tissue model variables before and after cardiac surgery in the OPCAB, CPB, and CPB-DA groups are illustrated in Figure 3. Marked and statistically significant increases in Raw were observed in the CPB group (74.9% ± 20.8%), whereas Iaw decreased significantly (-49.3% ± 38.8%). The CPB patients exhibited moderate increases in G (33.6% ± 9.1%) and smaller, but statistically significant, increases in H (18.2% ± 3.7%). The increase in {eta} after CPB (18.3% ± 10.4%) was not statistically significant. In contrast with the significant increase in Raw in the CPB patients, a marked and statistically significant decrease was observed in Raw (-40.6% ± 9.2%) in the CPB-DA group. In the latter group, the small decreases in G (-3.5% ± 8.1%) were associated with moderate increases in H (18.3% ± 5.3%). The opposite changes in G and H resulted in a decreased {eta} (-18.7% ± 5.2%). The patients in the OPCAP group showed no statistically significant change in Raw (11.8% ± 7.9%), Iaw (8.1% ± 18.0%), or {eta} (4.9% ± 3.7%), whereas G (60.0% ± 10.4%) and H (54.6% ± 9.5%) increased significantly.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Changes observed in airway and tissue mechanical variables after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (OPCAB) or after cardiopulmonary bypass with (CPB-DA) or without (CPB) dopamine administration. Raw = airway resistance; Iaw = airway inertance; G = tissue damping coefficient; H = tissue elastance coefficient; {eta} = tissue hysteresivity ({eta} = G/H). *P < 0.05. Error bars represent SE values.

 
Two-way ANOVA demonstrated that there was a highly significant interaction between CPB and time (before or after surgery) in Raw (P < 0.01), Iaw (P < 0.01), H (P < 0.001), and {eta} (P < 0.05); i.e., the changes in these variables were significantly influenced by the presence or absence of CPB during cardiac surgery. Highly significant interactions were observed between the effects of DA and time (before or after surgery) in Raw (P < 0.000001), Iaw (P < 0.05), G (P < 0.02), and {eta} (P < 0.01), demonstrating that the administration of DA affected the changes in the mechanical variables significantly during cardiac surgery requiring CPB. There was no difference (P = 0.6) between the EVLW values measured before (540.4 ± 60.5 mL) and after (544.8 ± 21.4 mL) CPB.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
Although numerous investigations have demonstrated the deleterious effects of CPB on the lungs (7–9,11–13), the potential contribution of the anesthesia itself to this impairment has not yet been studied. Therefore, in this study we measured the perioperative changes in respiratory mechanics in two groups of patients. The groups differed only in the presence of CPB; the anesthetic management, including the administration of drugs with potential bronchoactive properties, was identical in both patient populations. The CPB patients who needed positive inotropic medication (DA) were assigned to a separate group. This experimental design allowed us to distinguish the effects of CPB, the adrenergic drugs, and the anesthesia itself.

In this study, we enrolled patients with coronary artery disease and aortic or mitral valve diseases. Because patients with poor ejection fraction and high left ventricular end-diastolic pressure were omitted from the study population, it can be expected that the pulmonary circulation was not markedly affected by the cardiac disorder. Therefore, it may be anticipated that changes in lung mechanics were not due to altered pulmonary hemodynamics associated with postcapillary congestion (6).

The mechanical properties of the respiratory system at the usual range for spontaneous breathing frequency are determined to a comparable degree by the airways and the respiratory tissues (16–19,22). Small-amplitude low-frequency forced oscillations and fitting of the constant-phase model (16) to the impedance spectra provide a noninvasive technique for study of the airway and tissue mechanical variables separately. Because the changes in the respiratory system were expected to affect both the airway and tissue compartments, the forced oscillation method at low frequencies was considered an appropriate and sensitive technique with which to characterize the CPB-induced changes in the lungs.

The pulmonary and chest wall contributions to Rrs and the total Ers have been reported to be approximately equal in adult humans (7,22). Although the tissue variables G and H combine the mechanical properties of the lungs and the chest wall, the earlier finding that the chest wall elastance and resistance were unchanged after cardiac surgery (7) suggests that the lungs are responsible for the changes observed in this study. Nevertheless, the constancy of the chest wall variables blunts the increases observed in G and H after CPB.

Without the administration of adrenergic drugs, CPB induced significant increases in Raw that were associated with significant, but highly variable, decreases in Iaw. In contrast, these adverse changes in airway mechanics were not detectable in the OPCAB patients. Because the resistance and inertance are inversely related to the fourth and second power, respectively, of the radius of an airway, a decrease in the overall airway diameter is expected to increase both Raw and Iaw; this was not the case in the CPB patients. This controversial behavior of the airway variables can be interpreted in terms of inhomogeneous narrowing of the peripheral airways, which not only influences Rrs, but also alters the frequency dependence of Xrs, leading to biased estimates of Iaw (16), a mechanism confirmed by studies in which different resident gases were used during induced bronchoconstriction (18,19). According to previous studies (16,18,19), the increase in Raw after CPB is a result of inhomogeneous peripheral airway constriction, whereas the mechanisms involved in the airway narrowing remain speculative. Incomplete reopening of the peripheral lung after the standardizing volume excursion, distortions in lung configuration persisting temporarily after the closure of the chest, and uneven mucus deposition may all have led to increases in Raw. Because these factors existed in both the CPB and the OPCAP groups and because there was no change in the airway variables in the latter population, it seems more likely that a mechanism related specifically to the CPB was responsible for the adverse changes in the bronchial tree. This finding also agrees with the results of a recent study that reported impaired oxygenation and lung mechanics in CPB patients, whereas it demonstrated that OPCAB surgery had no measurable detrimental effects on the lungs (15). As concerns the potential mechanisms responsible for the adverse changes after CPB, the systemic inflammatory reaction induced by the extracorporeal circulation (23) might have led to airway narrowing via mucosal thickening or the release of bronchoactive contractile mediators.

Measurements of the flow and the sudden decrease in airway opening pressure after an end-inspiratory occlusion were used previously to estimate the changes in airway mechanics after CPB (5,8,12). In contrast with our findings, the authors who applied this technique demonstrated either a decrease (5) or no change (8,12) in Rmin immediately after cardiac surgery. In other studies, evaluation of the alveolar pressure during end-expiratory occlusions with a simple bedside respiratory monitor pointed to the appearance of an intrinsic PEEP (9,11,13). This was interpreted as a marker of increased Raw after CPB, which agrees with our results on Raw. The discrepancies between the results of the previous studies and the present ones can most probably be attributed to the different lung volumes at which the measurements were performed. It is apparent that the studies that suggested a decrease or no change in Raw were made at end-inspiration (5,8,12), whereas the measurements of intrinsic PEEP were made and the current forced oscillatory data were collected at end-expiration, where the likelihood of partial closure of the airways is enhanced.

We found significant increases in the respiratory tissue variables G and H in both the CPB and OPCAB groups. Because the increases in G exceeded those in H, the restrictive changes in the lung periphery may have been accompanied by other mechanisms. Smooth muscle constrictor drugs induce larger increases in Rti than in elastance (24). This phenomenon is attributed to the altered coupling between the resistive and elastic properties at the elementary level of the parenchyma and is therefore considered an intrinsic response of the lung tissue (21). However, inhomogeneous peripheral airway constriction increases the frequency-dependent component of pulmonary resistance, which is then readily accounted for by an artifactually increased value of G estimated from the fitting of the four-variable single-compartment model (16,18,19).

Although all the above-mentioned mechanisms may have coexisted in our measurements in both the CPB and the OPCAB groups, their respective roles were probably not equally important. Intrinsic changes in parenchymal viscoelastic properties may result from edema development or from the liberation of constrictor mediators acting mainly on the parenchymal contractile apparatus. The lack of change in EVLW indicates that edema did not develop, although this observation is based on measurements in a subgroup of CPB patients only. The liberation of mediators altering the parenchymal mechanics does not seem likely either, because the perioperative increases in the tissue variables in the CPB and OPCAB groups were similar, whereas the release of mediators is expected to occur primarily in the former patients. Restrictive processes were highly probable in our subjects, because the development of atelectasis with a subsequent decrease in functional residual capacity (FRC) toward the closing capacity is consistently observed after cardiac surgery with CPB (2–4), during anesthesia in the supine position, and during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (25,26). Indeed, this is in agreement with the increases in H and the proportional parts in G. The excessive increase in G can then be attributed to ventilation inhomogeneities and regarded as a virtual tissue change associated with another artifactual change, i.e., the reduction in Iaw (16,18,19).

The increase in H observed in this study after CPB fits in well with the increases of 16%–35% determined in Ers with the end-inflation occlusion method (EIOM) (8,9,11,12). By contrast, the even more marked increases in G are at variance with the unchanged Rti values obtained with the EIOM (8,12). The explanation for this discrepancy may lie in the different lung volumes at which G and Rti are estimated, which impose different conditions on airway closure. Both G and Rti reflect not only tissue viscoelasticity, but also time constant inequalities; nevertheless, G was estimated with small-amplitude oscillations around the FRC level, whereas Rti was derived from the transient response to the end-inspiratory occlusion, i.e., at an airway opening pressure level of 8–12 cm H2O, where the peripheral airway homogeneity was restored. In turn, the values of Ers correspond to the tidal excursion and hence reflect the elastic resistances at early inspiration, which are different before and after CPB. Therefore, unlike G and H, the resistive and elastic variables derived from the EIOM do not relate to the same inflation level of the respiratory system. Our study design, however, revealed that adverse changes in tissue mechanical variables may be a consequence of the anesthesia and intermittent positive-pressure ventilation, rather than the CPB itself.

Cardiac anesthesia often requires the administration of bronchoactive drugs, such as positive inotropic drugs. These drugs may affect the adverse changes induced by CPB. Therefore, the patients who received DA after CPB were assigned to a third group (CPB-DA). The marked decrease in Raw in these patients can be attributed to a substantial decrease in the bronchial tone, which was significantly higher in this population at the beginning of the surgery. The decreased bronchial tone may have resulted in a more homogeneous ventilation of the lung periphery, which is likely to be reflected in the decreased G and {eta} (18). The slight but uniform increases in H can be attributed to a lung volume loss, which may result from the elevated diaphragm. These findings indicate that the administration of DA may prevent some of the detrimental effects of CPB on the airways, although future studies involving patient groups with similar initial mechanical conditions are necessary to confirm this finding.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
The results of this study demonstrate that significant changes occur in the mechanical properties of the respiratory system during cardiac surgery necessitating extracorporeal circulation. Cardiac surgery without CPB does not affect the airway mechanics, although it deteriorates the tissue mechanics to a similar degree as in the CPB group. The CPB-induced changes in the lungs can be fully explained in terms of an inhomogeneous airway constriction causing partial closure of the airways. DA counteracts the effects of CPB on the bronchial system. These findings indicate that CPB leads to an impairment of the pulmonary mechanics, including airway narrowing and the development of atelectasis. The administration of DA may prevent the CPB-induced adverse changes in lung mechanics.


    Acknowledgments
 
Supported by grants from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA T30670) and the Hungarian Ministry of Health (ETT 591/1996 06).

The authors are grateful to Medial Ltd., Budapest, Hungary, for their generous support providing the PiCCO equipment.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Royston D, Minty BD, Higenbottam TW, et al. The effect of surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass on alveolar-capillary barrier function in human beings. Ann Thorac Surg 1982; 40: 139–43.
  2. Hachenberg T, Tenling A, Rothen HU, et al. Thoracic intravascular and extravascular fluid volumes in cardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 976–84.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Magnusson L, Zemgulis V, Wicky S, et al. Atelectasis is a major cause of hypoxaemia and shunt after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 1996; 87: 1153–63.
  4. Jonmarker C, Nordström L, Werner O. Changes in functional residual capacity during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 1986; 58: 428–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Auler JO, Zin WA, Caldeira MP, et al. Pre- and postoperative inspiratory mechanics in ischemic and valvular heart disease. Chest 1987; 92: 984–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Zin WA, Caldeira MPR, Cardoso WV, et al. Expiratory mechanics before and after uncomplicated heart surgery. Chest 1989; 95: 21–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Barnas GM, Watson RJ, Green MD, et al. Lung and chest wall mechanical properties before and after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76: 166–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Polese G, Lubli P, Mazzucco A, et al. Effects of open heart surgery on respiratory mechanics. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 1092–9.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Ranieri VM, Vitale N, Grasso S, et al. Time-course of impairment of respiratory mechanics after cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1454–60.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Bates JHT, Rossi A, Milic-Emili J. Analysis of the behavior of the respiratory system with constant inspiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 1985; 58: 1840–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Valta P, Takala J, Elissa NT, et al. Effects of PEEP on respiratory mechanics after open heart surgery. Chest 1992; 102: 227–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Cogliati AA, Menichetti A, Tritapepe L, et al. Effects of three techniques of lung management on pulmonary function during cardiopulmonary bypass. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1996; 47: 73–80.[Medline]
  13. Fletcher R. Raised end-expiratory alveolar pressures during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72: 629–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gilbert TB, Barnas GM, Sequeira AJ. Impact of pleurotomy, continuous positive airway pressure, and fluid balance during cardiopulmonary bypass on lung mechanics and oxygenation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1996; 10: 844–9.[ISI][Medline]
  15. Tschernko EM, Bambazek A, Wisser W, et al. Intrapulmonary shunt after cardiopulmonary bypass: the use of vital capacity maneuvers versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 732–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hantos Z, Daróczy B, Suki B, et al. Input impedance and peripheral inhomogeneity of dog lungs. J Appl Physiol 1992; 72: 168–78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hantos Z, Peták F, Adamicza Á, et al. Differential responses of global airway, terminal airway, and tissue impedances to histamine. J Appl Physiol 1995; 79: 1440–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lutchen KR, Hantos Z, Peták F, et al. Airway inhomogeneities contribute to apparent lung tissue mechanics during constriction. J Appl Physiol 1996; 80: 1841–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Peták F, Hantos Z, Adamicza Á, et al. Methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in rats: effects of intravenous vs. aerosol delivery. J Appl Physiol 1997; 82: 1479–87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Boldt J, von Bormann B, Kilng D, et al. Age and cardiac surgery: influence on extravascular lung water. Chest 1987; 91: 185–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Fredberg JJ, Stamenovic D. On the imperfect elasticity of lung tissue. J Appl Physiol 1989; 67: 2408–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hantos Z, Daróczy B, Suki B, et al. Forced oscillatory impedance of the respiratory system at low frequencies. J Appl Physiol 1986; 60: 123–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Edmunds LH Jr. Inflammatory and immunological response to cardiopulmonary bypass. In: Jonas RA, Elliott MB, eds. Cardiopulmonary bypass in neonates, infants and young children. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994: 225–42.
  24. Fredberg JJ, Bunk D, Ingenito E, et al. Tissue resistance and the contractile state of lung parenchyma. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 1387–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hirshman CA, Bergman NA. Factors influencing intrapulmonary airway calibre during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 30–42.[Free Full Text]
  26. Nunn JF. Effects of anaesthesia on respiration. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 54–62.[Free Full Text]
Accepted for publication December 17, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. M. Schultz, T. Karamlou, J. Swanson, I. Shen, and R. M. Ungerleider
Hypothermic Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass Impairs Pulmonary and Right Ventricular Function More Than Circulatory Arrest
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 474 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. W. Staton, W. H. Williams, E. M. Mahoney, J. Hu, H. Chu, P. G. Duke, and J. D. Puskas
Pulmonary Outcomes of Off-Pump vs On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Randomized Trial
Chest, March 1, 2005; 127(3): 892 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. Weissman
Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 185 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babik, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hantos, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babik, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hantos, Z.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Monitoring (Cardiac)
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press