JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (47)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Habib, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Habib, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;96:1377-1379
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society

ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Food and Drug Administration Black Box Warning on the Perioperative Use of Droperidol: A Review of the Cases

Ashraf S. Habib, MBBCh MSc, FRCA, and Tong J. Gan, MB FRCA

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tong J. Gan, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27707. Address e-mail to gan00001{at}mc.duke.edu


   Introduction
Top
 Introduction
Discussion
 References
 
In a recent Editorial (1), it was suggested that the use of small-dose droperidol has been a highly cost-effective antiemetic for over 30 years. Droperidol, 0.625–1.25 mg IV, has been widely accepted as a first-line therapy for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (2,3). The decision by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to issue a "black box" warning regarding the use of droperidol for the treatment and/or prevention of PONV has been challenged by many anesthesiologists (4).

Under the Freedom of Information Act, we requested information about the cases on which the FDA warning was based. In response, we received data contained in the adverse event reporting system: a computerized database that contains a summary of all adverse events reported to the FDA. There were 273 cases reported to the FDA over the period from November 1, 1997 until January 2, 2002. This information has been previously presented (5). After reviewing the database, we requested copies of the individual case reports (MedWatch forms) in which cardiac adverse events were reported after the use of droperidol at doses of 1.25 mg or less. These forms contain the information voluntarily submitted to the FDA or to the drug manufacturer by consumers or health care professionals. The reporting person determined whether droperidol was the primary or secondary suspect. The content of these forms represents ALL the information that the FDA has about the reported cases. The information extracted from the MedWatch forms is presented in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Cases Reported to the Food and Drug Administration of Serious Cardiac Adverse Events or Death Associated with Droperidol at Doses of 1.25 mg or Less
 

   Discussion
Top
 Introduction
 Discussion
References
 
We reported the 10 cases in the FDA database in which serious cardiovascular events were possibly related to the administration of droperidol at doses of 1.25 mg or less. A review of these case reports shows that there are several confounding factors that make it impossible to establish the precise cause of the adverse cardiac events. For example, Patient 1 received cyclobenzaprine, a centrally acting muscle relaxant, in combination with fluoxetine for the treatment of fibromyalgia and depression. Cyclobenzaprine is structurally related to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and can cause arrhythmias similar to those induced by the TCAs. Fluoxetine is a known inhibitor of several cytochrome P450 isoenzymes and is likely to inhibit the hepatic metabolism of cyclobenzaprine (6). Furthermore, this patient’s baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrated a prolonged QTc, almost of identical length to that found in the ECG immediately after the event. The fact that the event occurred 150 minutes AFTER an IV injection makes it extremely unlikely that the event was related to the antiemetic drug.

Patient 2 developed ventricular tachycardia 2 minutes after the administration of droperidol and dolasetron. This patient also received ondansetron intraoperatively for PONV prophylaxis. All the 5 HT3 receptor antagonists can prolong the QT interval and can produce arrhythmias, according to the package inserts of these drugs (1). Arrhythmias have been reported after the administration of ondansetron (7). Sevoflurane and isoflurane were also shown to prolong the QT interval (8,9).

Patient 7 had a history of significant arrhythmias. It is also likely that Patient 9 was developing a cardiac event prior to the administration of droperidol. Other confounding factors, such as cardiac disease, alcoholism, general anesthesia, and the administration of several other drugs with proarrhythmic potential, can be found in the remaining cases. In some of the cases there is also very little information available making it difficult to establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

It is estimated that over 11 million ampoules of droperidol were sold in the United States in 2001 (personal communication from manufacturers of droperidol). Possible cardiac events and torsade or prolonged QT occurred in 74 and 17 cases respectively of the 273 cases reported to the FDA (5). Assuming that sales of droperidol remained constant over the 4 years during which these adverse events were reported to the FDA, the incidence of cardiac events and torsade/prolonged QT would be 74:11 million and 17:11 million, respectively. It is, however, to be noted that some of the cases reported to the FDA were from non-US sources, so the true incidence in the United States is probably lower. It is also of note that MedWatch reporting is voluntary, and hence the true incidence may not be known. After the FDA "black box" warning, the sales of droperidol decreased by 10-fold during 2002 compared with 2001 (personal communication from manufacturers of droperidol).

We conclude that in none of the cases in which arrhythmias occurred after small doses of droperidol (1.25 mg or less) was there evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship.


   References
Top
 Introduction
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. White PF. Droperidol: a cost-effective antiemetic for over thirty years. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 789–90.[Free Full Text]
  2. White PF, Watcha MF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: prophylaxis versus treatment [editorial]. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 1337–9.[Free Full Text]
  3. Watcha MF. The cost-effective management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 931–3.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Gan TJ, White PF, Scuderi PE, et al. FDA "Black Box" warning regarding use of droperidol for postoperative nausea and vomiting: is it justified? Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 287.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Bailey P, Norton R, Karan S. The FDA droperidol warning: is it justified? Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 288–9.
  6. Michalets EL, Smith LK, Van Tassel ED. Torsade de pointes resulting from the addition of droperidol to an existing cytochrome P450 drug interaction. Ann Pharmacother 1998; 32: 761–5.[Abstract]
  7. Baguley WA, Hay WT, Mackie KP, et al. Cardiac dysrhythmias associated with the intravenous administration of ondansetron and metoclopramide. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1380–1.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Kleinsasser A, Kuenszberg E, Loeckinger A, et al. Sevoflurane, but not propofol, significantly prolongs the Q-T interval. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 25–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Michaloudis D, Fraidakis O, Lefaki T, et al. Anaesthesia and the QT interval in humans: the effects of isoflurane and halothane. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 219–24.[ISI][Medline]
Accepted for publication February 5, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
Y. L. Yang, H. Y. Lai, J. J. Wang, P. K. Wang, T. Y. Chen, C. C. Chu, and Y. Lee
The timing of haloperidol administration does not affect its prophylactic antiemetic efficacy: [Le moment choisi pour l'administration d'haloperidol n'affecte pas son efficacite anti-emetique prophylactique]
Can J Anesth, May 1, 2008; 55(5): 270 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. S. Habib and T. J. Gan
Haloperidol for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Are We Reinventing the Wheel?
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1343 - 1345.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. S. Habib and T. J. Gan
PRO: The Food and Drug Administration Black Box Warning on Droperidol Is Not Justified
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1414 - 1417.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. B. Ludwin and S. L. Shafer
CON: The Black Box Warning on Droperidol Should Not Be Removed (But Should Be Clarified!)
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1418 - 1420.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. L. Horta, L. C. L. Morejon, A. W. da Cruz, G. R. dos Santos, L. C. Welling, L. Terhorst, R. C. Costa, and R. U. Z. Alam
Study of the prophylactic effect of droperidol, alizapride, propofol and promethazine on spinal morphine-induced pruritus
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2006; 96(6): 796 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A. L Kovac
Meta-Analysis of the Use of Rescue Antiemetics Following PONV Prophylactic Failure with 5-HT3 Antagonist/Dexamethasone Versus Single-Agent Therapies
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2006; 40(5): 873 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J. B Leslie and T. J Gan
Meta-Analysis of the Safety of 5-HT3 Antagonists with Dexamethasone or Droperidol for Prevention of PONV
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2006; 40(5): 856 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Kinoshita, M. Dojo, K. Nakahata, Y. Kimoto, T. Kakutani, K. Mizumoto, and Y. Hatano
Augmented activity of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive k+ channels induced by droperidol in the rat aorta.
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 786 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
T.-F. Lin, Y.-C. Yeh, Y.-H. Yen, Y.-P. Wang, C.-J. Lin, and W.-Z. Sun
Antiemetic and analgesic-sparing effects of diphenhydramine added to morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 835 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. S. Habib, W. D. White, S. Eubanks, T. N. Pappas, and T. J. Gan
A Randomized Comparison of a Multimodal Management Strategy Versus Combination Antiemetics for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 77 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Zhang, Z. Luo, and P. F. White
A Model for Evaluating Droperidol's Effect on the Median QTc Interval
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1330 - 1335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. S. Habib and T. J. Gan
Evidence-based management of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a review: [Le traitement des nausees et des vomissements postoperatoires fonde sur des donnees probantes : une revue]
Can J Anesth, April 1, 2004; 51(4): 326 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. L. Parlow, I. Costache, N. Avery, and K. Turner
Single-Dose Haloperidol for the Prophylaxis of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Intrathecal Morphine
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1072 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. L. Shafer, A. S. Habib, and T. J. Gan
Safety of Patients Reason for FDA Black Box Warning on Droperidol * Response
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 551 - 552.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. Chang, A. Simone, L. Schultheis, and B. Rappaport
Reviewing Case Reports and the Droperidol Warning: FDA Response
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1542 - 1542.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Dershwitz, A. S. Habib, and T. J. Gan
There Should Be a Threshold Dose for the FDA Black-Box Warning on Droperidol * Response
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1542 - 1543.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. J. Gan, T. Meyer, C. C. Apfel, F. Chung, P. J. Davis, S. Eubanks, A. Kovac, B. K. Philip, D. I. Sessler, J. Temo, et al.
Consensus Guidelines for Managing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2003; 97(1): 62 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (47)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Habib, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Habib, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press