JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayhew, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Verghese, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayhew, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Verghese, S. T.

Anesth Analg 2003;96:1532
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

A More Dilute Concentration of Bupivacaine in a Larger Volume Can Be Effective in Blocking Spermatic Cord Traction Response in Orchidopexy

James F. Mayhew, MD FAAP

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR

To the Editor:

I read with interest the article by Verghese et al. (1). I would like to draw the authors’ attention to two reports that suggest that a more dilute concentration of bupivacaine in a larger volume can be effective to consistently give a higher level of block. The study by Gunter et al. (2) showed that a concentration of 0.175% bupivacaine was as effective as 0.25% but with less effect on the legs. Spears (3), who studied the volume needed to consistently reach thoracic levels in children, found optimum level to be 1.6 mL/kg. This combination of concentration and volume permits good analgesia not only for lower abdominal procedures, but also for upper abdominal and lower thoracic procedures as well, with little effect on lower limbs.

References

  1. Verghese ST, Hannallah RS, Rice LJ, et al. Caudal anesthesia in children: effect of volume versus concentration of buspivacine on blocking spermatic cord traction response during orchidopexy. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 1219–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gunter JB, Dunn CN, Bennie JB, et al. Optimum concentration of bupivacaine for combined caudal-general anesthesia in children. Anesthesiology 1991; 75: 57–61.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Spears R. Dose-response in infants receiving caudal anaesthesia with bupivacaine. Paediatr Anaesth 1991; 1: 47–52.

 

Response

Susan T. Verghese, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

In Response:

We thank Dr. Mayhew for his comments. There are several formulas for determining the appropriate dose of caudal anesthesia in children. When a large volume of bupivacaine is used, Armitage (1) suggested using a 0.2% concentration to prevent the unpleasant sensation of lower limb weakness. We agree that larger volumes of more dilute solutions of bupivacaine can be used to achieve analgesia for upper abdominal and lower thoracic procedures.

Reference

  1. Armitage EN. Caudal block in children. Anaesthesia 1979; 34; 396.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayhew, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Verghese, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayhew, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Verghese, S. T.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press