JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halvorsen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Veel, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halvorsen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Veel, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Heart
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;96:1578-1583
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

The Effect of Dexamethasone on Side Effects After Coronary Revascularization Procedures

Per Halvorsen, MD*, Johan Ræder, MD PhD{dagger}, Paul F. White, MD PhD{ddagger}, Sven M. Almdahl, MD PhD*, Kenneth Nordstrand, MD PhD*, Kjell Saatvedt, MD PhD*, and Terje Veel, MD PhD*

*Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Feiring Heart Clinic; {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; and {ddagger}Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. P. F. White, Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9068. Address e-mail to paul.white{at}utsouthwestern.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Corticosteroids decrease side effects after noncardiac elective surgery. We designed this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to test the hypothesis that standard doses of dexamethasone (4 mg x2) would reduce postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), and improve appetite after cardiac surgery, thereby facilitating the recovery process. A total of 300 patients undergoing coronary revascularization surgery were enrolled in this clinical study. The anesthetic management was standardized in all patients. Dexamethasone (4 mg/mL) or saline (1 mL) was administered after the induction of anesthesia and a second dose of the same study drug was given on the morning after surgery. The incidence of AF was determined by analyzing the first 72 h of continuously recorded electrocardiogram records after cardiac surgery. The patients were assessed at 24- and 48-h intervals after surgery, as well as at the time of hospital discharge, to determine the incidence and severity of postoperative side effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting, pain) and patient satisfaction scores. Dexamethasone significantly reduced the need for antiemetic rescue medication on the first postoperative day (30% versus 42%), and the incidences of nausea (15% versus 26%) and vomiting (5% versus 16%) on the second postoperative day (P < 0.05). In addition, dexamethasone significantly reduced the percentage of patients with a depressed appetite on the second postoperative day. However, the corticosteroid failed to decrease the incidence of AF (27% versus 32%) or the total dosage of opioid analgesic medication administered in the postoperative period. We conclude that dexamethasone (8 mg in divided doses) was beneficial in reducing emetic symptoms and improving appetite after cardiac surgery. However, this dose of the corticosteroid does not seem to have antiarrhythmic or analgesic-sparing properties.

IMPLICATIONS: Dexamethasone (8 mg IV) was beneficial in reducing emetic symptoms and increasing appetite after cardiac surgery. However, this dose of the corticosteroid failed to decrease postoperative pain or the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Corticosteroids have a variety of beneficial effects on recovery after elective surgery (1–4). A systematic review of the literature confirmed that dexamethasone reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (1). Corticosteroid therapy has also been reported to enhance appetite after major surgery (2). In patients undergoing noncardiac elective surgery, corticosteroids improved the management of postoperative pain (3) and facilitated the recovery process (4). In a retrospective study involving patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (5), large-dose dexamethasone facilitated tracheal extubation within 6 h after surgery (26% versus 10%), but failed to reduce the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital.

The most common postoperative side effect after CABG surgery is atrial fibrillation (AF), with a reported incidence of 20%–40% (6–9). In the previously mentioned study by Yared et al. (5) involving CABG patients at varying risks of developing AF, it was suggested that the administration of dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg IV) reduced the incidence of new onset AF during the first 3 postoperative days from 32% to 19%. Furthermore, a recent publication by Fillinger et al. (10) demonstrated beneficial effects of a glucocorticoid (methylprednisolone) in suppressing the production of the inflammatory mediators interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In a study involving nonsurgical patients, Dernellis and Panaretou (11) reported that the inflammatory mediator C-reactive protein has a strong association with paroxysmal AF. It is therefore possible that the inflammatory response to CPB might contribute to the occurrence of new onset AF in the postoperative period. Of interest, a recent report by Cui et al. (12) suggested that the perioperative use of glucocorticoid steroids was associated with a small incidence (13%) of AF after heart transplantation. Although standard doses of glucocorticoids have been reported to be effective in reducing PONV after both cardiac (10) and noncardiac surgery (1,3,13), their effect on the incidence of AF has not been investigated.

Therefore, we designed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to test the hypothesis that the perioperative administration of 8 mg of dexamethasone in divided doses would reduce PONV, the severity of postoperative pain, as well as the incidence of AF in patients undergoing CABG surgery.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient Selection
The study was approved by the regional ethics committee for South-Eastern Norway. After written, informed consent, patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery were entered into this study. All patients receiving chronic corticosteroid medication and those with a history of AF (or other cardiac arrhythmias) were excluded from participating. The patients were randomly allocated to either a control (saline) or dexamethasone (8 mg IV) group. A block randomization scheme was used with 20 patients allocated to each block, to minimize the effects of any subtle changes in therapy during the course of the investigation. To maintain the double-blinded study design, the sealed envelope was opened immediately before surgery, and the study drug was prepared in identical-appearing syringes by a nurse who did not participate in the treatment of the study patients.

Anesthetic Management
All patients received morphine (10–15 mg IM) and scopolamine (0.4–0.6 mg IM) for premedication 30–60 min before arrival in the operating room. General anesthesia was induced with diazepam (7.5–10 mg IV), thiopental (3–5 mg/kg IV), fentanyl (4–6 µg/kg IV), and pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg IV). Isoflurane (0.6%–1.2% inspired) and nitrous oxide (50%–60%) were administered for maintenance of anesthesia. The first dose of the study medication (either dexamethasone 4 mg IV, or saline 1 mL IV) was administered after initiating maintenance of anesthesia. All patients underwent median sternotomy and the operations were performed using CPB. Nitrous oxide was discontinued 5 min before CPB and isoflurane at the start of CPB when the patients received fentanyl (1–2 µg/kg IV) and midazolam (2 mg IV). Upon resumption of assisted ventilation, isoflurane (0.6%–1.2% inspired) was reintroduced. The patients were heparinized with an initial heparin dose of 400 IE/kg to achieve an activated clotting time of 480 s or longer, and protamine, 4 mg/kg IV, was administered after CPB to reverse the residual heparin effect.

Postoperative Management
All patients were tracheally extubated in the ICU when they were judged to be hemodynamically stable with adequate spontaneous ventilatory function. Nitroglycerin, labetalol, or nitroprusside was infused to maintain the systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg in the early postoperative period. Upon arrival in the ICU, all patients received acetaminophen, 1 g PR, followed by 1 g every 6 h. Diclofenac 75–100 mg IM followed by 50 mg per os every 8 h was added unless contraindicated. Ketobemidone (an opioid analgesic) 1–2 mg IV was administered as a "rescue" analgesic when patients complained to the nurse about incisional pain in the postoperative period. On the morning of the first postoperative day, the patients received a second dose of the same study medication (i.e., dexamethasone 4 mg IV, or saline 1 mL IV). If the patient complained of feeling nauseated or experienced emetic symptoms (e.g., vomiting or retching), metoclopramide 10 mg IV was administered as the "first line" rescue antiemetic. If the emetic symptoms persisted, ondansetron 4 mg IV, droperidol 1.25 mg IV, and prochlorperazine 25 mg PR, were administered in a sequential manner. Blood samples were obtained at 6–12-h intervals for determination of plasma electrolyte and glucose levels.

Outcome Analysis
After removal of the chest tubes, the severity of pain was assessed using a visual analog scale, with 0 = no pain to 100 = most severe pain imaginable. The durations of nausea and pain were assessed using a standardized 5-point verbal rating scale: 0 = none, 1 = <50% of the time, 2 = 50% of the time, 3 = >50% of the time, and 4 = all the time. The patients were also asked to rate their appetite as normal or decreased (i.e., depressed). These assessments were performed on the morning of the first and second postoperative days, and at the time of discharge from the hospital. At the time of discharge (5–6 days after surgery), patients were asked to assess their level of satisfaction with their overall care, as well as the management of their emetic symptoms and pain using a 5-point verbal rating scale (with 1 = very bad to 5 = very good), and to record if they experienced any depressive symptoms, excessive thirst, difficult sleep, dysphoria, or nightmares. The occurrence of AF during the postoperative period was assessed by reviewing the continuously recorded electrocardiogram (ECG) data from a Hewlett-Packard ECG monitoring system (H/P Vigilance, Stuttgart, Germany) during the first 72 h after surgery. Episodes of atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia were not included in the calculation of the relative incidences of AF. During the remainder of the hospital stay, the regularity of the patient’s heart rate was assessed at 2-h intervals and ECG monitoring was reinstituted if the patient displayed signs of a dysrhythmia. The number of patients who experienced an episode of AF and the duration of AF were both recorded.

The primary outcomes of this study were the incidences of PONV requiring a therapeutic intervention and new onset AF during the first 72 h after surgery. The secondary end-points were severity of pain and the opioid analgesic requirement. At the Feiring Heart Clinic, the database demonstrated incidences of both PONV and AF in the range of 30%–40% over the last 2 yr. Assuming that a reduction in AF from 35% to 20% would be of "clinical" significance, 145 patients would have to be enrolled in each treatment group to achieve a significant difference (P < 0.05) with a power of 80%.

Proportional data were presented as numbers or percentages in each group, whereas continuous data were presented as means ± SD or medians (and interquartile ranges). Proportional data were evaluated using the {chi}2 test. Two-sample t-test was used to make comparison between groups whenever criteria for normal distribution were accomplished, otherwise a Mann-Whitney U-test was applied. The Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons between the groups. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Three hundred patients were enrolled in this study over a period of 10 mo. Six were excluded from the efficacy analysis because of: 1) an anaphylactoid reaction to protamine (n = 1), 2) development of acute abdominal complications after surgery (n = 2), 3) a perforated ventricular ulcus (n = 1), and 4) protocol violations related to the use of nonapproved antiemetic drugs (n = 2). The two study groups (n = 147 in each) were comparable with respect to their demographic characteristics, pre- and intraoperative drug dosages, and surgical factors (Table 1). Perioperative blood loss, fluid balance, and recovery times in the two groups were also similar (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Demographic Characteristics and Intraoperative Data for the Two Treatment Groups
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Postoperative Recovery Characteristics for the Two Study Groups
 
In the dexamethasone group, there was a significant reduction in the number of patients receiving the primary rescue antiemetic medication on postoperative day 1 (30% versus 42%) and in the number of patients experiencing nausea (15% versus 26%) and vomiting (5% versus 16%) on postoperative day 2 (Table 3). In addition, more patients in the control group had a decreased appetite on postoperative day 2 (45% versus 23%). However, the incidence (27% versus 32%) and mean duration (33 ± 31 versus 29 ± 33 h) of AF did not significantly differ between the dexamethasone and control groups, respectively (Table 4). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the severity of postoperative pain as assessed by visual analog scale pain scores or the need for rescue analgesic drugs (Table 4). Finally, there were no differences in patient satisfaction during the early recovery period (data not reported). Interestingly, 10 patients in the dexamethasone group (versus none in the control group) experienced transient nausea immediately after injection of the second dose of the study drug (P < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Emetic Symptoms and Need for "Rescue" Antiemetic Drugs in the Two Study Groups
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Postoperative Pain, Need for Analgesic Medication, and Side Effects in the Two Treatment Groups
 
There were five postoperative infectious complications, three in the dexamethasone group (two pneumonias, and one urinary tract infection) and two in the control group (one mediastinal wound infection and one urinary tract infection) (Table 4). One patient in each study group died as a result of gastrointestinal complications (e.g., acute abdomen). None of the other patients in either group developed electrolyte disturbances, hyperglycemia, dysphoric, or acute psychotic reactions. All 294 study patients were discharged from the ICU on the first postoperative day and from the hospital on the fifth or sixth postoperative day.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A small dose of dexamethasone administered during and on the morning after CABG surgery resulted in a significant reduction in emetic symptoms and improved appetite in this surgical population. These findings support the recent report by Fillinger et al. (10) in a similar patient population receiving methylprednisolone (15 mg/kg IV before surgery and 0.3 mg/kg IV every 6 hours for 24 hours). In the later study, the incidence of PONV in the first 24 hours after surgery was reduced from 33% to zero. The beneficial effect of corticosteroids on postoperative emetic symptoms after cardiac surgery is consistent with studies involving patients undergoing ambulatory surgery (3,13). Other possible explanations included the improved appetite in the dexamethasone group, consistent with the known anabolic effect of the corticosteroids (14). This may prove to be beneficial with respect to patient outcome because early oral feeding should facilitate recovery and rehabilitation (2). However, analogous to the study by Fillinger et al. (10), we also failed to demonstrate a significant beneficial effect of the glucocorticoid in facilitating the recovery process (e.g., tracheal extubation, ICU stay, or hospital discharge).

The effect of corticosteroids on postoperative pain is controversial (3,4). Although a positive effect was reported by Aasboe et al. (3), this finding was not confirmed in a follow-up study involving a similar outpatient population (4). Fillinger et al. (10) also failed to find an effect of the glucocorticoid on postoperative pain scores or opioid analgesic requirements. One reason for the lack of analgesic effect in the current study may be attributed to the relatively low pain score in the control group because of the use of a "multimodal" analgesic regimen, making it difficult to demonstrate further improvement by adding the corticosteroid.

The failure to demonstrate a beneficial effect of dexamethasone on the incidence of postoperative AF seems to contradict the findings of Yared et al. (5). This earlier study was a retrospective analysis in which there was no attempt to stratify the patients with respect to their risk of developing AF after CABG surgery (e.g., previous history of AF, poor left ventricular function, current therapy with ß-blocking drugs). Furthermore, it is possible that transient episodes of AF could have been missed in the earlier study if the ECG was not continuously monitored for at least 72 hours.

The difference in outcome in the current study and the previous study by Yared et al. (5) may also be related to the larger dose of dexamethasone administered in the earlier study (0.6 versus 0.12 mg/kg). Alternatively, the reduction in the incidence of AF in the study by Yared et al. (5) may have been an "incidental finding" (albeit statistically significant) which would not be reproducible even if 40–60 mg of dexamethasone had been administered in the current study. Unfortunately, the more recent study by Fillinger et al. (10) did not evaluate the effect of perioperative methylprednisolone on the incidence of AF.

We were reluctant to use larger doses of dexamethasone (>0.12 mg/kg) because of possible side effects, including gastrointestinal and infectious complications, hyperglycemia, dysphoria, and psychotic reactions (15). Of interest, one patient in the control group died of complications associated with an acute gastrointestinal perforation. In the studies by Yared et al. (5) and Fillinger et al. (10), the steroid-treated patients had larger blood glucose levels on admission to the ICU. However, there are no published data documenting an increase in clinically significant side effects after short-term administration of dexamethasone during the perioperative period (even when larger doses [>0.12 mg/kg] were administered).

Our data also suggest that the favorable effects of dexamethasone in limiting adverse gastrointestinal side effects after cardiac surgery occur at smaller dosages than those alleged to produce an antiarrhythmic effect. Dose-ranging studies with dexamethasone are needed to carefully examine both the beneficial and potentially deleterious effects (e.g., immunosuppression, wound complications, hyperglycemia, dysphoria, psychotic reactions) of administering glucocorticosteroids to patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Our study can be criticized because it may have been underpowered to demonstrate significant differences in some of the other secondary outcome measures.

The incidence of AF is significantly reduced if ß-adrenergic blocker therapy is continued after CABG (16,17). In our study, most of the patients (88% in the dexamethasone group and 84% in the control group) were receiving a ß-adrenergic blocker immediately before surgery and these patients resumed using their ß-adrenergic blocker after surgery. The incidence of AF in both study groups (27%–32%) is consistent with the incidence of AF after CABG surgery at most medical centers in the United States (5,10). An unexpected observation was the "acute" nausea spontaneously reported by 10 patients immediately after the IV injection of dexamethasone (4 mg) on the first postoperative day. Because this side effect has not been previously reported in the medical literature after IV injection of corticosteroid medication, it may be related to the solvent used in the commercial formulation [Decadron® (MSD)]. The "beneficial" effect of dexamethasone in reducing emetic symptoms and improving patient appetite, as well as potentially decreasing extravascular fluid (18), must be balanced against its potential side effects after CABG surgery.

In conclusion, dexamethasone (8 mg IV) reduced emetic symptoms and increased appetite after CABG surgery. However, the incidence of postoperative AF and the severity of pain were not altered.


    Acknowledgments
 
Supported by institutional sources only. PFW received departmental support for his visiting professorship in Norway during the time this study was designed and organized.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Henzi I, Walder B, Tramer MR. Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 186–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Moiniche S, Dahl JB, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Colonic resection with early discharge after combined subarachnoid-epidural analgesia, preoperative glucocorticoids, and early postoperative mobilization and feeding in a pulmonary high-risk patient. Reg Anesth 1994; 19: 352–6.[Medline]
  3. Aasboe V, Raeder JC, Groegaard B. Betamethasone reduces postoperative pain and nausea after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 319–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Coloma M, Duffy LL, White PF, et al. Dexamethasone facilitates discharge after outpatient anorectal surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 85–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Yared JP, Starr NJ, Torres FK, et al. Effects of single dose, postinduction dexamethasone on recovery after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 1420–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16: 9–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Leitch JW, Thomson D, Baird DK, Harris PJ. The importance of age as a predictor of atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 100: 338–42.[Abstract]
  8. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation 1996; 94: 390–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Mathew JP, Parks R, Savino JS, et al. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: predictors, outcomes, and resource utilization. MultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. JAMA 1996; 276: 300–6.[Abstract]
  10. Fillinger MP, Rassias AJ, Guyre PM, et al. Glucocorticoid effects on the inflammatory and clinical responses to cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 153–9.
  11. Dernellis J, Panaretou M. C-reactive protein and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: evidence of the implication of an inflammatory process in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Acta Cardiol 2001; 56: 375–80.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Cui G, Tung T, Kobashigawa J, et al. Increased incidence of atrial flutter associated with the rejection of heart transplantation. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 280–4.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Coloma M, White PF, Markowitz SD, et al. Dexamethasone in combination with dolasetron for prophylaxis in the ambulatory setting: effect on outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 1346–50.[ISI][Medline]
  14. Loprinzi CL, Kugler JW, Sloan JA, et al. Randomized comparison of megestrol acetate versus dexamethasone versus fluoxymesterone for the treatment of cancer anorexia/cachexia. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3299–306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Buchman AL. Side effects of corticosteroid therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 33: 289–94.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Kowey PR, Taylor JE, Rials SJ, Marinchak RA. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of prophylactic drug therapy in preventing supraventricular arrhythmia early after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 963–5.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Andrews TC, Reimold SC, Berlin JA, Antman EM. Prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Circulation 1991; 84: 236–44.[ISI]
  18. Von Spiegel T, Giannaris S, Wietasch GJ, et al. Effects of dexamethasone on intravascular and extravascular fluid balance in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 827–34.[ISI][Medline]
Accepted for publication February 4, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M.-L. Kaljusto, K.-O. Stenslokken, T. Mori, A. Panchenko, M.-L. Frantzen, G. Valen, and J. Vaage
Preconditioning effects of steroids and hyperoxia on cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury and vascular reactivity
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 355 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Halonen, P. Halonen, O. Jarvinen, P. Taskinen, T. Auvinen, M. Tarkka, M. Hippelainen, T. Juvonen, J. Hartikainen, and T. Hakala
Corticosteroids for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, April 11, 2007; 297(14): 1562 - 1567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. Romundstad, H. Breivik, H. Roald, K. Skolleborg, T. Haugen, J. Narum, and A. Stubhaug
Methylprednisolone Reduces Pain, Emesis, and Fatigue After Breast Augmentation Surgery: A Single-Dose, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study with Methylprednisolone 125 mg, Parecoxib 40 mg, and Placebo
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 418 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Bianconi and L. Calo
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 468 - 468.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. Prasongsukarn, J. G. Abel, W.R. E. Jamieson, A. Cheung, J. A. Russell, K. R. Walley, and S. V. Lichtenstein
The effects of steroids on the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A prospective randomized trial
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2005; 130(1): 93 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Ishii, R. B. Schuessler, S. L. Gaynor, K. Yamada, A. S. Fu, J. P. Boineau, and R. J. Damiano Jr
Inflammation of Atrium After Cardiac Surgery Is Associated With Inhomogeneity of Atrial Conduction and Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, June 7, 2005; 111(22): 2881 - 2888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. L. Burlacu, D. Healy, D. J. Buggy, C. Twomey, D. Veerasingam, A. Tierney, and D. C. Moriarty
Continuous Gastric Decompression for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Coronary Revascularization Surgery
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 321 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halvorsen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Veel, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halvorsen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Veel, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Heart
Right arrow Pharmacology


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press