JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lacouture, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lacouture, P. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;97:124-131
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

A Model to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Variables of Extended-Release Products Using In Vivo Tissue Microdialysis in Humans: Bupivacaine-Loaded Microcapsules

Dan J. Kopacz, MD*, Christopher M. Bernards, MD{dagger}, Hugh W. Allen, MD*, Craig Landau, MD{ddagger}, Partha Nandy, PhD§, Danlin Wu, PhD§, and Peter G. Lacouture, PhD||

Department of Anesthesiology, *Virginia Mason Clinic and {dagger}University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; {ddagger}Medical Research and §Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Purdue Pharma L. P., Stamford; ||Magidom Discovery, LLC, Westport, Connecticut; and ¶Department of Anesthesia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Dan J. Kopacz, Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Clinic, 1100 Ninth Ave., B2-AN, PO Box 900, Seattle, WA 98111. Address e-mail to anedjk{at}vmmc.org


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Biodegradable microcapsules produce an ultra-long duration of local anesthesia. We hypothesized that this duration is caused by the sustained-release of bupivacaine from the microcapsules into the surrounding tissue. Previous studies investigated the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of bupivacaine after release from microcapsules and absorption into the systemic circulation. Microdialysis sampling can determine the PKs of any drug at its site of injection. This study was performed to characterize the PKs of bupivacaine and dexamethasone released from microcapsules at a subcutaneous injection site over a 96-h period in volunteers. Bupivacaine concentrations were compared with clinical variables of local anesthetic blockade. This study demonstrates that bupivacaine is released in a sustained manner from microcapsules, that bupivacaine concentrations increase for 24–34 h after microcapsule injection, and that analgesia parallels the tissue bupivacaine concentration obtained by microdialysis. Analgesia was equally rapid in onset with aqueous and microcapsule bupivacaine (P = 0.23). Analgesia was still present at 78% of microcapsule-injected sites after 96 h, significantly longer than for aqueous bupivacaine (P < 0.001). Mild pruritus was the most common side effect, occurring with 56% of the microcapsule injections. Dexamethasone-containing bupivacaine microcapsules are well tolerated and produce a prolonged duration of skin analgesia. Systemic absorption of bupivacaine produces higher peak plasma levels after aqueous injection than after microcapsule injection, despite the injection of a threefold larger load of bupivacaine in the latter.

IMPLICATIONS: Microcapsules loaded with bupivacaine and dexamethasone and administered by subcutaneous injection produce prolonged cutaneous anesthesia and analgesia. Determination of local tissue pharmacokinetic variables of bupivacaine by microdialysis confirms that the prolonged duration of anesthesia is caused by the extended release characteristics of the microcapsules.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A local anesthetic of ultra-long duration would be a significant advance in the care of surgical and pain management patients. Bupivacaine-containing biodegradable polymer microcapsules produce anesthesia for >7 days in animal models (1,2). Because the proportion of bupivacaine contained in these microcapsules approximates 75% by weight, the amount of bupivacaine injected exceeds that injected with aqueous solutions. Furthermore, the inclusion of dexamethasone within microcapsules has been demonstrated to extend the duration of effect (3).

The injection of large amounts of bupivacaine could produce both systemic and local toxicity. Local anesthetics are neurotoxic when administered in large concentrations (4,5). Neurotoxicity seems to be related to both the perineural local anesthetic concentration and to the period that the nerve is exposed.

We previously used microdialysis methodology to demonstrate the effects of both epinephrine and clonidine on the elimination of lidocaine from the site of injection by continuous sampling over 5 h (6,7). This methodology is superior to others in which only blood concentrations are measured because pharmacokinetic (PK) variables derived by microdialysis sampling at the injection site are markedly different from those obtained by venous blood sampling. The former also correlate better with the pharmacodynamic (PD) behavior of these drugs. In vivo analysis of bupivacaine release from polymer microcapsules by microdialysis sampling has not been investigated, nor has microdialysis sampling of tissue local anesthetic concentrations been performed for longer than 5 h.

Microdialysis can determine whether a microcapsule formulation is releasing drug too fast or slow, to assess drug loading, and to determine how changes in microcapsule concentration and/or volume affect drug release and local tissue concentrations. Knowledge of the PK variables of bupivacaine release could lead to optimization of microcapsules and an improvement of their clinical anesthetic/analgesic characteristics.

The primary objective of this study was to use a robust in vivo microdialysis technique to confirm that subcutaneously injected polymer microcapsules produce a sustained release of bupivacaine into the surrounding tissue. Additionally, the study was designed to preliminarily explore the effect of bupivacaine dose and concentration on tissue PKs and PDs.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ASA physical status I volunteers of both sexes participated after IRB approval and informed consent. A history of local anesthetic sensitivity or of lower extremity trauma were exclusions.

The study was conducted in two parts. Polylactic-co-glycolic acid polymer microcapsules loaded with bupivacaine (approximately 72% free base with 0.04% dexamethasone; manufactured by Purdue Pharma L. P., Stamford, CT) was suspended to produce a concentration expressed as "% microcapsules" (microcapsules [mg]/mL). The microcapsule concentrations studied were 1.25% and 2.5%, which correspond to bupivacaine doses of 9 and 18 mg of bupivacaine base/mL, respectively. Part 1 (12 volunteers) was an open-label, randomized trial investigating whether the presence of a microdialysis catheter influences the onset or duration of cutaneous anesthesia. All subjects in Part 1 had microdialysis catheters placed in the left leg only. Injections were made into the left leg of subjects in 1A, and both legs of subjects in 1B and 1C. Plasma bupivacaine and dexamethasone concentrations were obtained from all subjects.

Part 1: Three subject groups (4 subjects each):

1A) 2.5% dexamethasone-containing bupivacaine microcapsules, 15 mL, left leg (total bupivacaine = 270 mg, total dexamethasone = 150 µg)
1B) 2.5% dexamethasone-containing bupivacaine microcapsules, 15 mL each leg (total bupivacaine = 540 mg, total dexamethasone = 300 µg)
1C) 0.5% aqueous bupivacaine, 15 mL each leg (total bupivacaine = 150 mg)

Microdialysis samples from Part 1 were used as "pilot" samples to determine the general range, timing, and variability of tissue bupivacaine concentrations to be expected for the formal PK analysis conducted in Part 2.

Part 2 (16 subjects) was a double-blinded, randomized, parallel trial investigating the relationship between dose (volume and concentration) and tissue bupivacaine and dexamethasone PKs, and on the duration of sensory anesthesia. All subjects had microdialysis catheters placed in both legs.

Part 2: Three subject groups:

2A) Concentration constant (6 subjects)
2.5% dexamethasone-containing bupivacaine microcapsules
Left = 15 mL, right = 7.5 mL (total bupivacaine = 405 mg, total dexamethasone = 225 µg)
2B) Volume constant (6 subjects)
15-mL injection volume
Left = 2.5% dexamethasone-containing bupivacaine microcapsules, right = 1.25% dexamethasone-containing bupivacaine microcapsules (total bupivacaine = 405 mg, total dexamethasone = 225 µg)
2C) Aqueous bupivacaine control (4 subjects)
15-mL injection volume
Both legs = 0.25% aqueous bupivacaine (total bupivacaine = 75 mg)

Injections were performed on the anteromedial lower leg in a 6 x 6 cm diamond-shaped area. Opposite corners, and 2 interior points along the line connecting these 2 corners, were first anesthetized with 0.5 mL of 0.5% lidocaine. A 2-in., 18-gauge IV catheter and needle was inserted through the skin of one of the interior points, advanced subcutaneously for approximately 4 cm, exiting the skin at the second point. The needle was removed, leaving the "insertion" catheter tip protruding. A custom loop microdialysis catheter was inserted through the insertion catheter tip to span the middle of the diamond-shaped injection area. Custom microdialysis catheters were made by one of the authors (CMB) as previously described (6). The tip of the insertion catheter was then withdrawn to reside entirely in the subcutaneous tissue.

After microdialysis fluid was infused through the microdialysis catheter at 10 µL/min for a 10-min equilibration period, study drug was injected using the following standard sequence. The first 40% (3 or 6 mL) was injected fanwise (4 passes) from the distal corner. The second 40% was injected identically from the opposite proximal corner. The final 20% (1.5 or 3 mL) was injected through the "insertion" catheter as it was withdrawn through the subcutaneous tissue. This catheter was removed entirely at the end of the injection, ensuring that the previously placed microdialysis catheter resided in the center of this final 20%. Injections took approximately 4 min.

Dialysate collection commenced at the end of drug injection and was continuous for 3 h (10 µL/min, 20-min sampling periods, total sample = 200 µL). After this period, the microdialysis catheter was left in place, but was disconnected and capped. Additional microdialysis samples (20-min collection) were obtained 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after injection, with venous blood samples obtained simultaneously. The microdialysis catheter was removed after 96 h.

Sensory testing (pin-prick, thermal thresholds, and cold/wet sensation) were conducted after 30 min, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Pain to pinprick (dental needle) was rated on a 3-point scale: 0 = no sensation (anesthesia), 1 = pin sensed as dull (analgesia), 2 = sharp. Determination of warm and heat pain detection thresholds was performed with a custom-built thermode-thermocouple starting at 30°C, and increasing at 1.5°C/s, to a cutoff of 50°C. Cold/wet sensation was tested using an alcohol swab. Cutaneous blood flow velocity was tested using a laser Doppler flowprobe at the injection site and at an unblocked control site (left thigh). Adverse events at the injection sites were assessed through 96 h and at 2 wk, 6 wk, 2 mo, and 6 mo.

Venous blood samples for determination of bupivacaine and dexamethasone concentrations were obtained at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Plasma was immediately separated by centrifugation and stored at -20°C.

Microdialysate and plasma bupivacaine and dexamethasone determinations and PK calculations were performed at Purdue Pharma L. P. Bupivacaine and dexamethasone concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry using multiple reaction monitoring, operating under positive electron spread mode. The calibration ranges were 5–300 (bupivacaine in plasma), 0.5–5 (dexamethasone in plasma), 50–80,000 (bupivacaine in dialysate), and 0.5–200 ng/mL (dexamethasone in dialysate). Blank plasma was used to prepare the calibrants and quality controls (QCs) for plasma sample analysis; saline was used to prepare the calibrants and QCs for dialysate sample analysis, after it was experimentally verified that saline was bioanalytically equivalent to dialysate. Sample preparation was performed on a 96-well solid-phase extraction plate, before instrument analysis. QC samples were inter-dispersed throughout the analysis, and all passed the acceptance criteria. The lower limits of quantitation for bupivacaine in plasma and tissue dialysate were 5 and 50 ng/mL, respectively, and for dexamethasone, 0.5 ng/mL, both plasma and tissue dialysate.

Concentration-time profiles of bupivacaine and dexamethasone were used to determine peak plasma/dialysate concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax), terminal elimination half-life (t1/2), and area under the concentration-time curve from injection to 96 h (AUCt). The t1/2 was calculated from the terminal slope by linear regression. The PK variables were estimated using a noncompartmental analysis technique.

Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD or median (range). Because of the exploratory nature of this investigation, no power analysis was used to determine sample size. Postinvestigation analyses of clinical variables were conducted using repeated-measures analysis of variance, unpaired t-test, and {chi}2 analysis where appropriate, with P < 0.05 significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All volunteers (15 men, 13 women; aged 31 ± 7 yr, weight 81.1 ± 15.1 kg, height 175.2 ± 10.7cm) completed the study. Anesthesia was unaffected by the presence of a microdialysis catheter (repeated-measures analysis of variance, P = 0.34). The tissue bupivacaine concentration-time profiles were consistent within all groups. Microdialysis reproducibly detected peak and total tissue exposure to bupivacaine in different subjects receiving the same amount of bupivacaine. Subjects receiving aqueous bupivacaine have immediate peaks in tissue bupivacaine, which decline over 12–24 h. Tissue bupivacaine in subjects receiving microcapsules also showed a rapid increase over the first 3 h, plateau between 3–6 h, and continued increase in tissue bupivacaine for the next 18 h. Notably, regardless of whether aqueous solution or microcapsules were injected, bupivacaine concentrations measured by microdialysis are 100–1000 fold larger (µg/mL) (Fig. 1) than simultaneous concentrations in plasma (ng/mL) (Fig. 2).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Time course of tissue dialysate bupivacaine concentration obtained from subcutaneous microdialysis catheters over the 96-h study period for differing volumes and concentrations of aqueous and microcapsule bupivacaine. Note that concentrations are expressed as mean ± SD in micrograms/milliliter.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Time course of plasma bupivacaine concentration obtained over the 96-h study period after subcutaneous injection of differing volumes and concentrations of aqueous and microcapsule bupivacaine. Note that concentrations are expressed as mean ± SD in nanograms/milliliter.

 
Tissue bupivacaine in subjects receiving 2.5% microcapsules peak at levels 2–3 times larger, and 30–35 h later, than those from aqueous bupivacaine (Table 1). Tissue bupivacaine in subjects receiving 1.25% microcapsules occurred at an intermediate time (15 h), suggesting tmax may be concentration dependent. Interestingly, neither the tissue bupivacaine Cmax, nor the AUC, for subjects receiving 2.5% microcapsules (15 mL, 270 mg bupivacaine) were double those of subjects receiving either half the volume or half the concentration of microcapsules. Levels obtained in the latter two groups were comparable. The t1/2ß of aqueous bupivacaine was not consistently shorter than for subjects receiving 15-mL, 2.5% microcapsules. The longest elimination half-lives occurred in subjects receiving 1.25% microcapsules or the smaller volume (7.5 mL) of 2.5% microcapsules.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Tissue Dialysate Bupivacaine/Dexamethasone Pharmacokinetics
 
Aqueous bupivacaine is rapidly distributed into the systemic circulation, with tmax occurring <1 h after injection (Table 2). In contrast, microcapsule bupivacaine distributes slowly into the systemic circulation, with tmax from 30 to 60 h (Fig. 2). Plasma bupivacaine data must be interpreted with caution, because the sources of bupivacaine were heterogeneous in 2 of the groups receiving bilateral injections (1.25% versus 2.5% subjects, and 7.5- versus 15-mL subjects). As with tissue bupivacaine, doubling the dose of microcapsules also resulted in less than doubling of the plasma Cmax. Peak plasma levels with the largest dose of microcapsules were only approximately 65% of those for 0.5% aqueous bupivacaine, despite injection of a nearly fourfold larger dose of bupivacaine.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Plasma Bupivacaine/Dexamethasone Pharmacokinetics
 
Interestingly, dexamethasone release from microcapsules did not parallel bupivacaine. The peak in tissue and plasma dexamethasone concentration (tmax) occurred much sooner (approximately half the time) than the bupivacaine peak (Tables 1 and 2). Dexamethasone was detectable in tissue through 96 h, but not in plasma after 72 h.

All subjects developed analgesia, but more subjects receiving 15-mL 2.5% microcapsules or 0.5% aqueous bupivacaine developed anesthesia at the injection site (Fig. 3A, {chi}2 P = 0.01). Significantly more subjects receiving aqueous bupivacaine had analgesia present at 30 min ({chi}2 P < 0.04, 16 of 16 aqueous sites versus 25 of 36 microsphere sites [18 of 24, 2.5% 15 mL; 4 of 6, 2.5% 7.5 mL; 3 of 6, 1.25% 15 mL]). Onset of analgesia averaged 49 ± 41 min at microcapsule sites (P = 0.21 versus aqueous [30 ± 0 min]). In subjects who developed anesthesia, onset was faster for aqueous bupivacaine than for microcapsules (41 ± 16 versus 743 ± 874 min, respectively, P = 0.03) (Fig. 3A). Duration of analgesia was longer for subjects receiving microcapsules compared with aqueous (3.4 ± 0.8 days versus 0.9 ± 0.5 days, P < 0.001, Fig. 3B). The onset and duration of loss of cold/wet sensation paralleled analgesia to pinprick (Fig. 3C). Analgesia was still present in 78% (28 of 36) of the sites receiving microcapsules at the end of 96 h. These subjects reported this sensation persisting for an additional 48.9 ± 22 h.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Anesthesia (pinprick [pin] = 0) was achieved in 52% of subjects, with significantly more in subjects receiving 0.5% aqueous bupivacaine or 15 mL of 2.5% microspheres (A) ({chi}2 P = 0.01). All subjects achieved analgesia (pin score 1 = touch only [B]) and the inability to feel cold/wet (C). Onset of analgesia was not different between aqueous and microcapsule preparations (P = 0.21), but the duration was significantly longer after microcapsule injection (P < 0.001). Analgesia was still present at 78% of the microcapsule sites after 96 h.

 
Heat pain and warm detection thresholds were comparable to the anesthesia and analgesia response to pinprick. Increase of these thresholds was more rapid and of shorter duration with aqueous bupivacaine. At 96 h, 78% (28 of 36) and 64% (23 of 36) of subjects receiving microcapsules still had increased heat pain and warm thresholds (Figs. 4, A and B).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The threshold for perceiving the temperature of a thermode as warm (A) (mean ± SD) or as uncomfortably hot (B) after the subcutaneous injection of aqueous bupivacaine or bupivacaine-containing microcapsules.

 
Blood flow increased in all subjects in the first 30 min with no differences between groups, but rapidly returned to baseline with some subjects demonstrating a compensatory decrease in blood flow velocity from 3 to 6 h after injection (median increase 105%, range 54%–145%, P = 0.59). Blood flow velocity returned to baseline and remained at that level throughout the remainder of the trial.

Because study infiltrations were into the area traversed by superficial branches of the saphenous nerve, anesthesia/hypesthesia also developed distal to the site of injection. Distal blockade developed in 19% of injections, tended to occur more frequently at sites of microcapsule injection (9 of 36 versus 1 of 16 for aqueous bupivacaine, P = 0.11), extended to the skin overlying the medial malleolus in some subjects (within the distribution of the saphenous nerve), but did not outlast anesthesia at the site of injection.

Pruritus occurred in 2 of 16 sites receiving aqueous bupivacaine and 20 of 36 sites injected with microcapsules. Mild induration occurred at 15 of 36 microcapsule sites. Pruritus tended to occur more frequently at sites receiving 2.5% microcapsules (18 of 30 = 60%), than at sites receiving 1.25% (2 of 6 = 33%, P = 0.23). Pruritus began from 1 to 32 days (median = 14 days, mean = 15 days) after injection and persisted for 1–125 days (median = 14 days, mean = 19 days). Induration started approximately 2 days after the onset of pruritus (range 1–27 days, median = 21 days, mean = 19 days), and lasted an average of 48 days (median = 37 days, range 21–120 days). No signs or symptoms of neurotoxicity were reported throughout the 6-mo study period.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study confirms that the prolonged duration of analgesia produced by bupivacaine-containing microcapsules is caused by the continuous release of local anesthetic. It also demonstrates the advantages of microdialysis as an accurate measure of tissue drug concentration over time and for precise PK-PD modeling. In this model, the reliability of microdialysis methodology in measuring tissue concentrations of bupivacaine and dexamethasone was assessed by determining the similarity of the tissue PK metrics obtained at different sites using identical doses of bupivacaine. For identical treatment sites, the mean tissue dialysate Cmax and AUCt were similar, indicating that the microdialysis method can reliably detect similar peak and total tissue exposure to bupivacaine. Local tissue concentrations of bupivacaine also seem to correlate well with local sensory testing. The presence of a microdialysis catheter had no effect on sensory, temperature, or blood flow testing. Furthermore, tissue levels were consistent and reproducible over 96 hours.

Several release characteristics of this particular microcapsule formulation were detected by microdialysis sampling which document its safety, and which suggest modifications for future formulations. Although the peak tissue bupivacaine concentrations were significantly larger than for aqueous bupivacaine, they were attained much more gradually. Despite larger tissue bupivacaine concentrations, much smaller plasma bupivacaine concentrations were produced, affirming the safety of the microcapsules regarding systemic toxicity.

Ideally, one would design a sustained-release local anesthetic to rapidly achieve a minimally effective tissue concentration threshold, plateau just above this level for the desired period of time, and then decrease below that threshold such that sensory function returns to normal. Whereas microdialysis is the ideal technology for determining the minimally effective tissue concentrations for both anesthesia and analgesia, this study was not designed to conduct formal PK-PD analysis.

One might expect a larger concentration (or volume) of microcapsules to produce a longer duration of effect. The results of this study suggest otherwise, because the clinical characteristics of 1.25% and the small-volume (7.5 mL) 2.5% preparations were as effective as the large-volume 2.5% preparation. Furthermore, the 1.25% concentration produced a tissue bupivacaine "plateau" closer to the peak tissue concentration produced by aqueous bupivacaine. However, doubling the dose of microcapsules also did not double the peak bupivacaine concentration (tissue or plasma).

Presumably, there is also a tissue bupivacaine toxicity threshold for concentration and exposure time, such that when surpassed, irreparable damage to blood vessels, nerves, or nerve fibers is produced. Although tissue bupivacaine concentrations were much larger for a longer period in the microcapsule subjects, no damage attributable to bupivacaine was detected.

Different PK mechanisms are in effect for the aqueous and microcapsule preparations. Bupivacaine from the aqueous preparation is delivered as a bolus into the subcutaneous tissue. This is followed exclusively by elimination as a result of uptake into the systemic circulation. Bupivacaine delivered into the subcutaneous tissue from microcapsules is initially substantial, although not as much as with aqueous solution. This initial bupivacaine exposure is thought to be caused by the small amount of free drug that exists in solution after suspension of the microcapsules. In contrast to the aqueous injection, as elimination of this initial bupivacaine begins, additional bupivacaine is delivered to the tissue from the microcapsules. For the first 24–34 hours, the release of additional bupivacaine from the microcapsules exceeds elimination, and tissue concentrations continually increase (Fig. 1). Beyond that, either the bulk of bupivacaine has been released from the microcapsule, or the gradient between the microcapsule and its surrounding tissue is reduced, such that elimination exceeds further release of bupivacaine, and tissue bupivacaine declines. The t1/2ß only considers this final elimination phase, whereas elimination has actually been continuing for the previous 24–34-hour period. Elimination half-life may not be an appropriate PK variable for describing or comparing microcapsules. Furthermore, the extrapolation of AUC to infinity, which is often done after single bolus injection of other drugs, also is not appropriate in this study, because it is unlikely that bupivacaine release from the microcapsule remains constant, especially after 96 hours. Release of bupivacaine from microcapsules may be more analogous to a continuous drug infusion, where context-sensitive half-times are thought to be a more clinically relevant descriptor of drug behavior (8).

Finding different release rates of two drugs from the same microcapsule is new and unexplained. Dexamethasone concentrations peaked earlier in both tissue dialysate and plasma samples than bupivacaine. Previous studies have demonstrated a much longer duration with dexamethasone-containing microcapsules (3). This prolongation is likely attributable to a PD mechanism, because it would be difficult to pharmacokinetically explain an extension of bupivacaine anesthesia beyond 72–96 hours when tissue dexamethasone concentrations peak within 20 hours of injection.

We were also surprised to find no correlation of tissue bupivacaine with blood flow. Essentially, all sites exhibited vasodilation for the first 30 minutes with blood flow rapidly returning to baseline levels thereafter. Previous studies have shown that the addition of vasoconstrictive drugs can reduce skin blood flow for periods much longer than 30 minutes (6,7). Apparently, skin blood flow autoregulatory mechanisms can overcome the vasodilatory effects of bupivacaine, but are insufficient to offset the effects of supplementary vasoconstrictive drugs.

Because adverse effects seen in this study (mild pruritus and induration) occurred much later than peak tissue bupivacaine, we believe they are caused by the copolymer matrix and not bupivacaine. The induration response to implantable polysaccharide is well documented and described as a normal foreign body reaction appearing in parallel with polymer biodegradation (9). Because of the limited sample size, it could not be determined whether these effects are dose-related to either the microcapsule matrix and/or bupivacaine load.

In conclusion, the subcutaneous injection of dexamethasone-containing bupivacaine microcapsules produces a prolonged duration of skin anesthesia and analgesia. These effects are a result of the sustained release of bupivacaine from the microcapsules, a process in which PK mechanisms can be determine in vivo by microdialysis sampling.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by Purdue Pharma L. P., Stamford, CT, and the Virginia Mason Research Center, Seattle, WA.

The authors thank Jormain Cady, ARNP, Jill Zeller, RN, Pearl Washburn, RN, Rose Lopez, RN, Joel Miller, and Steve Harris, MD, Purdue Pharma L. P., Stamford, CT, for their assistance and dedication during the conduct of this investigation.


    Footnotes
 
Presented in part at the American Society of Anesthesiology annual meeting, Orlando, FL, October 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Curley J, Castillo J, Hotz J, et al. Prolonged regional nerve blockade. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 1401–10.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Drager C, Benziger D, Gao F, Berde C. Prolonged intercostal nerve blockade in sheep using controlled-release of bupivacaine and dexamethasone from polymer microspheres. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 969–79.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Castillo J, Curley J, Hotz J, et al. Glucocorticoids prolong rat sciatic nerve blockade in vivo from bupivacaine microspheres. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 1157–66.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Bainton CR, Strichartz GR. Concentration-dependence of lidocaine-induced irreversible conduction loss in frog nerve. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 657–67.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Lambert LA, Lambert DH, Strichartz GR. Irreversible conduction block in isolated nerve by high concentrations of local anesthetics. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 1082–93.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Bernards C, Kopacz D. Effect of epinephrine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: a microdialysis study in humans. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 962–8.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Kopacz DJ, Bernards CM. Effect of clonidine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: a microdialysis study in humans. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 1371–6.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Kapila A, Glass P, Jacobs J, et al. Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 968–75.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Shive M, Anderson J. Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1997; 28: 5–24.[ISI][Medline]
Accepted for publication February 25, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. L. Pedersen, J. Lilleso, N. A. Hammer, M. U. Werner, K. Holte, P. G. Lacouture, and H. Kehlet
Bupivacaine in Microcapsules Prolongs Analgesia After Subcutaneous Infiltration in Humans: A Dose-Finding Study
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2004; 99(3): 912 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lacouture, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lacouture, P. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press