| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume-sensitive chloride channels (VSCC) play an important role in regulation of cell volume and electrical activity. Activation of vascular smooth muscle VSCC causes smooth muscle depolarization and contraction. We investigated the effects of propofol on VSCC in cultured human coronary artery smooth muscle cells by using the chloride-sensitive dye 6-methoxy-N-ethylquinolinium (MEQ). To activate VSCC, cells were superfused for 2 min with hypotonic gluconate solutions and then potassium thiocyanate solution. The percentage reduction in MEQ fluorescence during 60 s in the presence of potassium thiocyanate was measured and used as an index of VSCC activity. 5-Nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino) benzoic acid (NPPB), a well characterized chloride channel blocker, and propofol were dissolved in hypotonic gluconate solution to test their effect on VSCC activity. The reduction in fluorescence was inversely related to osmolality, indicating that activation of VSCC is osmolality dependent. Hypotonic gluconate solution (210 mOsm/kg H2O) reduced fluorescence by 38.9% ± 2.6% of the baseline value. The reduction in fluorescence was dose-dependently inhibited by NPPB. Propofol at 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 µg/mL significantly inhibited the reduction in fluorescence to 23.6% ± 4.8%, 19.7% ± 7.4%, 18.2% ± 3.5%, 17.6% ± 5.0%, 15.8% ± 3.1%, and 10.3% ± 3.9% of the baseline value, respectively. Our results indicate that propofol inhibits VSCC in a dose-dependent manner in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. IMPLICATIONS: Propofol inhibits human coronary artery smooth muscle volume-sensitive chloride channels in a dose-dependent manner.
Volume-sensitive chloride channels (VSCC) are ubiquitous in mammalian cells, where they regulate cell volume, electrical activity, intracellular pH, immunological responses, cell proliferation, and differentiation (13). It is possible that VSCC are active over a range of volume states that may include basal isotonic conditions, and they may play a role even in the absence of pathologic cell swelling (1). In vascular smooth muscle, VSCC play a critical role in electrophysiology (46). Activation of vascular smooth muscle VSCC results in Cl- efflux and depolarization, which opens voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, increasing intracellular Ca2+ and leading to contraction (3,7). VSCC may contribute to stretch-induced constriction of vascular smooth muscle (6,8), although there is some controversy over this issue (9,10). In addition, the endothelium may regulate vascular tone in some vessels by inhibiting VSCC (11,12). Many anesthetics reduce vascular tone. However, very little is known about anesthetic effect on VSCC activity. Blockade of VSCC activity in vascular smooth muscle will lead to vasodilation. Propofol, 2,6-diisopropyl phenol, is a short-acting, potent IV anesthetic that causes endothelium-independent vasodilatation (13,14), as well as attenuation of myogenic responses (15). The common structural basis for VSCC-blocking reagents is a phenol with hydrophobic groups, such as short alkyl chains or an additional phenyl ring (16). Because propofol is a phenol derivative, we hypothesized that propofol could block VSCC. In this study, we investigated the effects of propofol on VSCC in cultured human coronary artery smooth muscle cells by using fluorescence measurements.
Human coronary artery smooth muscle cells, which were certified virus free and a pure cell population on the basis of -actin staining, were obtained from Cell Application, Inc. (San Diego, CA). The cells were routinely maintained in cell culture medium (Cell Application, Inc.) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Third- to sixth -passage cultures were then seeded onto glass-bottomed culture dishes (MatTek Corp., Ashford, MA) and allowed to reach subfluence in 57 days. Chloride-free Ringers solution was obtained by substituting chloride salts with gluconate. The composition of isotonic gluconate solution (Iso290) was (mM): Na-gluconate 135, K-gluconate 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, Ca-gluconate 1.2, NaH2PO4 1, glucose 5.5, and Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane 5, with pH adjusted to 7.3 (measured osmolality, 292 ± 7 mOsm/kg H2O). Hypotonic gluconate solution was made by reducing Na-gluconate to 110, 91, 60, 35, and 15 mM, designated Hypo240, Hypo210, Hypo160, Hypo100, and Hypo60, respectively. The measured osmolality for each solution was 245 ± 6 mOsm/kg H2O, 207 ± 6 mOsm/kg H2O, 156 ± 5 mOsm/kg H2O, 102 ± 4 mOsm/kg H2O, and 60 ± 3 mOsm/kg H2O (n = 6 in each group), respectively. The composition of potassium thiocyanate (KSCN) solution was KSCN 150 mM (measured osmolality, 280 ± 9 mOsm/kg H2O). Osmolality was measured by the freezing-point technique (Osmostat OM-6040; Kyoto Diichi Kagaku, Kyoto, Japan). 5-Nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino) benzoic acid (NPPB), a well characterized chloride channel blocker, and propofol were dissolved in Hypo210 from stock solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide. The final concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide was <0.1%, which does not affect Cl- currents (8). To facilitate loading of cells, the halide-sensitive fluorescent dye 6-methoxy-N-ethylquinolium iodide (MEQ) was reduced to cell-permeable dihydro-MEQ as described previously (17). Briefly, MEQ (5 mg/0.1 mL; 16 µM) was reduced by adding sodium borohydride (12% in H2O; 32 µM) under a stream of nitrogen in the dark. After the reaction was completed (30 min), the dihydro-MEQ oil was extracted with ethyl acetate (0.5 mL), and extracts were dried with anhydrous MgSO4 (100 mg). Dihydro-MEQ was stored at -80°C until use. Before each experiment, dihydro-MEQ was resuspended in Earles solution and used immediately. For loading, cells were incubated in dihydro-MEQ (5 µM) solution at 37°C (5% CO2). After 15 min of loading, cells were washed with Earles solution and incubated in Earles solution for another 15 min before measurement. Once loaded in cells, dihydro-MEQ is converted by intracellular oxidation to MEQ, which is retained within the cells. A cell-perfusion system was designed to measure cell fluorescence in response to rapid solution changes by using an inverted epifluorescence microscope (Eclipse TS100; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Solutions were infused and aspirated through stainless-steel tubing into glass-bottomed culture dishes. The exchange volume of the glass bottom was approximately 150 µL. Cell-perfusion solutions were maintained at constant temperature by enclosing the perfusion solution tubing in a circulating-water jacket. Excitation of MEQ was obtained from a xenon lamp (50 W; Nikon) filtered at 365/10 nm and reflected to the microscope objective (10x, CFI Plan Fluor ELWD 10xC; Nikon) by a dichroic mirror centered at 400 nm. Photobleaching was minimized by using a 10x microscope objective and neutral density filters: 2.53.5 optical density (OD). Cell fluorescence was collected by the objective, passed to a 400-nm-long path filter, and directed to a digital cooled black and white charge-coupled device camera (ORCA; Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). Fluorescence images were acquired at 15-s intervals by using an image processing system (Aquacosmos; Hamamatsu Photonics) and stored in a computer. To further limit photobleaching, excitation was manually synchronized with sampling. Fluorescence images were analyzed for average pixel intensities of regions of interest (ROI). These ROI were selected manually with a maximum of approximately five cells per field. The responses of all selected cells were averaged to yield a response per dish.
VSCC possess several common biophysical and pharmacological properties, including activation by hypotonic solutions, an anion selectivity sequence of thiocyanate (SCN-) > I- = NO3- > Br- > Cl- > F- > gluconate, and sensitivity to blockade by NPPB (2). We used a modified method of fluorescence measurements of VSCC activity (17). The cells were continuously superfused with a gluconate solution at 35°C on glass-bottomed culture dishes at 4 mL/min for 2 min. MEQ fluorescence is quenched by anions, and fluorescence intensity is inversely related to intracellular anions (17). Replacement of chloride salts with gluconate is necessary for maintaining a maximum initial fluorescence of MEQ (17). Gluconate is less permeable than Cl- in VSCC (17). At the time points indicated (arrows in Fig. 1), the gluconate solution was changed to a KSCN solution. The extracellular KSCN solution was used to confirm anion passage through VSCC, because SCN- is more permeable to VSCC than Cl- and can quench MEQ fluorescence more effectively than can Cl-. A large concentration of SCN- was used to enhance the signal/noise ratio (17). Although the osmolality of the KSCN solution was almost isotonic, this was not expected to inactivate the VSCC completely during measurements because, once activated by hypotonic solution, Cl- current persists in an activated state for at least 60 s even under isotonic conditions (8,17). The percentage change in MEQ fluorescence is calculated as follows: equation
F0 is the fluorescence just before beginning KSCN perfusion, and FSCN is fluorescence 60 s after beginning KSCN perfusion (Fig. 1). To investigate the effects of osmolality on anion movement across the cell membrane, 36 dishes were randomly assigned to 6 groups of different osmolality: 290 mOsm/kg H2O (Iso290), 250 mOsm/kg H2O (Hypo250), 210 mOsm/kg H2O (Hypo210), 150 mOsm/kg H2O (Hypo150), 100 mOsm/kg H2O (Hypo100), and 60 mOsm/kg H2O (Hypo60) (n = 6 in each group). To investigate the effects of NPPB on VSCC, 16 dishes treated with Hypo210 were randomly assigned to 4 groups of different NPPB concentrations: 0, 50, 100, and 200 µM (n = 4 in each group). To investigate the effects of propofol on VSCC, 48 dishes treated with Hypo210 were randomly assigned to 8 groups of different propofol concentrations: 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 µg/mL (n = 6 in each group). MEQ was purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). NaH2PO4 was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All other drugs were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). All results are expressed as mean ± SD. Values were compared by using analysis of variance with the Scheffé post hoc test. A value of P < 0.05 was accepted as significant.
Results
Propofol 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 µg/mL attenuated the reduction in fluorescence (Fig. 4). The change in fluorescence was significantly less at 0.3 to 100 µg/mL concentrations of propofol (P < 0.05) than the Hypo210 alone. The change in fluorescence was significantly less at 1 to 100 µg/mL concentrations of propofol (P < 0.05) than at 0.1 µg/mL. The change in fluorescence was significantly less at 100 µg/mL concentrations of propofol than at 0.3 and 1 µg/mL.
The major findings of this study are that hypotonic stimulation of cultured human coronary smooth muscle cells activated VSCC in an osmolality-dependent fashion. The activation of VSCC could be blocked with NPPB, supporting this conclusion. More importantly, activation of VSCC could be blocked with propofol. Propofol has been shown to relax vascular smooth muscle in an endothelium-independent manner (13,14), which has been ascribed to inhibition of free cytosolic Ca2+ mobilization (18) and blockade of voltage-gated Ca2+ influx (13,14). However, on the basis of our findings, propofol may also reduce Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels by inhibition of VSCC (3). In this study, we showed, using MEQ-based methods, that propofol inhibition of VSCC is dose dependent. During clinical anesthesia, total and free plasma propofol concentrations differ significantly. Park et al. (19) estimated that total propofol blood concentrations range from 1 to 20 µg/mL during clinical anesthesia. The free plasma concentration of propofol is 0.6 µg/mL (3.4 µM) or less (19) because 97%99% of propofol is bound to plasma proteins. We previously reported that actual propofol concentrations in the superfusate of our experimental system were 0.4 ± 0.1 µg/mL, 1.3 ± 0.2 µg/mL, 5.6 ± 0.4 µg/mL, 16.7 ± 0.6 µg/mL, and 60.1 ± 3.6 µg/mL at total concentrations of 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 µg/mL, respectively (20). Thus, in our study, propofol significantly inhibited VSCC at a clinically relevant concentration. We found that hypotonic stimulation reduced MEQ fluorescence in an osmolality-dependent manner. Previous studies based on the patch-clamp technique have shown that hypotonic stimulation activates volume-sensitive chloride currents in smooth muscle cells (5,8). Although our estimates of VSCC activity based on MEQ fluorescence are qualitative (17,21,22), the half-maximal activation of VSCC occurred in our study at approximately 171 mOsm/kg H2O. This result is similar to the half-maximal osmolal activation of endothelial cell VSCC observed with the patch-clamp method (23). In our study, 50200 µM NPPB significantly inhibited the reduction in fluorescence in a concentration-dependent fashion, and this was similar to the concentration-dependent effect of NPPB on VSCC with the patch-clamp method (2). We think that this is clear evidence that the reduction in fluorescence was mediated by activation of VSCC. Although available pharmacological blockers are not entirely selective for VSCC (2), the effects of cation movement could be ignored because our method measured only changes in intracellular anion concentration. Thus, on the basis of this information, we conclude that hypotonicity activated VSCC-dependent anion movement, which was inhibited by NPPB. Activation of VSCC (4,6) and a swelling-activated nonselective cation channel (9,10) may be involved in the mechanism by which pressure causes depolarization. Activation of VSCC produces depolarization because the Cl- equilibrium potential (approximately -20 to -30 mV) is substantially more positive than the resting membrane potential (approximately -50 to -75 mV) (7). Another important Cl- channel in vascular smooth muscle is the Ca2+-activated Cl- channel (7). Activation of the swelling-activated nonselective cation channel may result in Ca2+ influx and opening of Ca2+-activated Cl- channels. However, the Cl- channels involved in the myogenic response were insensitive to niflumic acid, an effective blocker of Ca2+-activated Cl- channels (4,24). In addition, blocking Ca2+ current and/or reducing Ca2+ appears not to explain the inhibition of Cl- efflux, because nimodipine, a selective Ca2+ channel antagonist, inhibited myogenic tone but had no effect on Cl- flux (6). Nelson et al. (4) reported that pressure-induced depolarization of cerebral arteries occurs in the presence of Ca2+ channel blockers such as nisoldipine and diltiazem, which reduce intracellular Ca2+ concentrations to less than those required for Ca2+-activated chloride channel activity. Furthermore, Nagase et al. (25) reported that propofol does not attenuate the induction of Ca2+-activated Cl- currents by the intracellular injection of CaCl2, indicating that propofol does not affect Ca2+-activated Cl- channels in Xenopus oocytes. Although species- and expression system-dependent differences from human coronary artery smooth muscle cells might be present, those facts suggest that in our study, propofol reduced anion entry by blockade of VSCC and not by Ca2+-activated Cl- channels. Chloride-sensitive fluorescent indicators provide an approach for studying Cl- transport that is complementary to the intracellular microelectrode and patch-clamp method (21). The potential advantages of Cl--sensitive fluorescent indicators over other available methods are technical simplicity, noninvasiveness, high time-resolution for measurement of fast transport processes, and detection of the electroneutral movements of Cl- (17,21). Some limitations of this study should be pointed out. Although ion flux, as measured, is influx, this is only a result of the technique, and under normal physiologic conditions, the flux would be in the opposite direction. We have used hypotonic stress as an in vitro example of mechanical stress in this study. Welsh et al. (9) reported that a hypotonic shock elicited a functional response that was similar to myogenic control. It should be noted that the effects of propofol on VSCC were evaluated when VSCC were activated with a 210 mOsm/kg H2O hyposmolar solution. Lang et al. (3) reported that exposure of human vascular smooth muscle cells to 25% hypotonic extracellular fluids led to a rapid depolarization of 13 mV. An increase of transmural pressure from 0 to 100 mm Hg induced a 16-mV membrane depolarization in cat middle cerebral artery (26). Thus, Hypo210 was selected in this study to induce a mechanical stress that was relevant to mechanical stress that occurs in vivo. Doughty and Langton (6) reported that myogenic contraction was accompanied by a temperature-dependent increase in Cl- efflux from arteries. We performed experiments by keeping the temperature at 35°C. Differences in VSCC function may occur in vivo, where mechanisms of activation of the channel may differ. However, our data support the ability of propofol to block VSCC function. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that propofol inhibits volume-sensitive chloride channels in a dose-dependent manner in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. This result may provide insight into the vasodilatory effects of propofol.
Supported by a Grant-in-Aid (12671476) for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan. The authors thank Dr. Johnny E. Brian, Jr., Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, for critical reading of the manuscript.
Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, New Orleans, LA, October 15, 2001.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|