| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Medical & Dental University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Address correspondence and reprint requests to K. Nakazawa, MD, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Medical & Dental University School of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1138519, Japan. Address e-mail to nakazawa.mane{at}tmd.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IMPLICATIONS: We report a case of airway management of symptomatic lingual tonsillar hypertrophy (LTH) in a patient with Downs syndrome. Fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation while maintaining spontaneous breathing under inhaled anesthesia may be preferable in pediatric or uncooperative patients with LTH.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case Report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preoperative fiberoptic laryngoscopy performed by an otolaryngologist demonstrated multiple lobular hypertrophied lingual tonsils at the base of tongue. The epiglottis was edematous, and the glottis could not be identified. On physical examination, the tongue was large, and a Mallampati score of III was determined. Head and neck movement were not limited, and there was no suggestion of atlantoaxial instability on radiograph. Although aspirin and dipyridamole were discontinued 7 days before surgery, bleeding time was slightly prolonged (5 min). Awake fiberoptic intubation was not considered to be an appropriate choice because of the patients developmental delay and inability to cooperate. Furthermore, the parents wished to avoid elective tracheostomy unless it was required in the case of a life-threatening emergency. In addition, the otolaryngologist requested nasotracheal intubation to facilitate the operative procedure.
At the induction of anesthesia, a laryngeal mask airway (LMA), laryngeal tube, fiberoptic bronchoscope, endoscopy mask, percutaneous cricothyrotomy kit, jet ventilator, and surgical tracheostomy were prepared in case of failed intubation. Anesthesia was induced with IV propofol 1 mg/kg, followed by 3%4% sevoflurane in 100% oxygen so as not to induce apnea. Mask-assisted ventilation was possible during spontaneous respiration but was difficult when spontaneous breathing stopped.
After topical anesthesia of the lingual surface with 8% lidocaine spray, rigid direct laryngoscopy was attempted. The epiglottis could not be exposed because of hypertrophied tonsillar tissues, and we avoided advancing the laryngoscope blade by force so that tonsillar bleeding would be prevented. Insertion of an LMA was considered inappropriate because of periglottic obstruction and bleeding tendency. After topical application of phenylephrine to the nasal mucosa, we therefore performed fiberoptic bronchoscopy through the nasal cavity under spontaneous breathing in combination with jet ventilation through the oropharynx. The fiberscopic view was also poor and the epiglottis was not visible because of excessive tonsillar tissues. However, after elevation of the mandible, the vocal cord was identified, and a cuffed, reinforced 5.5-mm-inner-diameter tracheal tube was successfully placed through the fiberoptic bronchoscope. Oxygenation was adequate throughout the laryngoscopy and intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in 50% oxygen with air, and the patient was paralyzed with vecuronium bromide as necessary. End-tidal carbon dioxide tension was kept at 40 mm Hg during the operative procedure.
After surgery, the patient was kept tracheally intubated because postoperative supraglottic edema was anticipated. Supraglottic edema was observed from the first to the sixth postoperative days, and the patient was extubated in the operating room on the seventh day. Symptoms of OSA gradually subsided, and the patient was discharged from the hospital uneventfully.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Use of LMA is controversial in patients with LTH. Although there are several reports of successful use of LMA in patients with upper airway obstruction secondary to a lingual tonsil (6,8), Fundingsland and Benumof (7) reported a case in which LMA was of only limited efficacy as a ventilatory conduit. Furthermore, Asai et al. (10) cautioned that insertion of LMA and subsequent blind intubation could potentially damage periglottic tissues. Davies et al. (8) also reported that repeated insertions of LMA between intubation attempts can be traumatic and cause edema of the airway. In this case, we avoided using LMA despite difficult mask ventilation because of the potential bleeding tendency of the tonsillar tissues. We believe that the major reasons for successful fiberoptic intubation in this case were to avoid damaging tonsillar tissue by inserting an oral airway, to refrain from tracheal tube insertion under poor laryngeal visualization on a rigid blade, and to maintain spontaneous breathing.
Although the preoperative conditions in this case other than airway conditions were diverse, Moyamoya disease and cardiac anomalies did not significantly affect the course of anesthesia other than making the administration of antiplatelet therapy necessary.
It is not certain whether LTH is associated with Downs syndrome. A compensatory mechanism for hypertrophy after adenotonsillectomy (3,13,14) and repeated upper respiratory tract infections was considerable in this case. Because LTH is apt to be not recognized, careful preoperative airway screening is crucial in patients with Downs syndrome who have a history of adenotonsillectomy. Fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation while maintaining spontaneous breathing under inhaled anesthesia is one of the recommended methods of securing the airway in uncooperative pediatric patients with LTH.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Lavoie The Pierre Limoges Pediatric Anesthesia Lecture: Tricky problems in pediatric anesthesia Can J Anesth, June 1, 2004; 51(suppl_1): R10 - R10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Al Shamaa, P. Jefferson, D. R. Ball, K. Nakazawa, D. Ikeda, S. Ishikawa, and K. Makita Lingual Tonsillar Hypertrophy: Airway Management Using Straight Blade Direct Laryngoscopy * Response Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 874 - 875. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|