JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardman, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Aitkenhead, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardman, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Aitkenhead, A. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)

Anesth Analg 2003;97:1846-1851
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


GENERAL ARTICLES

Estimating Alveolar Dead Space from the Arterial to End-Tidal CO2 Gradient: A Modeling Analysis

Jonathan G. Hardman, FRCA, and Alan R. Aitkenhead, FRCA

From the University Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jonathan G. Hardman, Clinical Senior Lecturer, University Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. Address email to j.hardman{at}nottingham.ac.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Using an original, validated, high-fidelity model of pulmonary physiology, we compared the arterial to end-tidal CO2 gradient divided by the arterial CO2 tension (Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2) with alveolar dead space expressed as a fraction of alveolar tidal volume, calculated in the conventional manner using Fowler’s technique and the Bohr equation: (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler. We examined the variability of Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and of (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler in the presence of three ventilation-perfusion defects while varying CO2 production (VCO2), venous admixture, and anatomical dead space fraction (VDanat). Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 was approximately 59.5% of (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler. During constant alveolar configuration, the factors examined (VCO2, pulmonary shunt fraction, and VDanat) each caused variation in (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler and in Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2. Induced variation was slightly larger for Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 during changes in VDanat, but was similar during variation of venous admixture and VCO2. Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 may be a useful serial measurement in the critically ill patient because all the necessary data are easily obtained and calculation is significantly simpler than for (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler.

IMPLICATIONS: Using an original, validated, high-fidelity model of pulmonary physiology, we have demonstrated that the arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure gradient may be used to robustly and accurately quantify alveolar dead space. After clinical validation, its use could replace that of conventionally calculated alveolar dead space fraction, particularly in the critically ill.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Alveolar dead space (VDalv) impairs pulmonary gas exchange, increases the obligatory work of breathing and prevents or prolongs weaning from mechanical ventilation (1,2). Measurement of VDalv may facilitate estimation of disease progression, increase the efficacy of some interventions (particularly ventilatory), and improve perioperative outcome (3,4). Recent evidence suggests that pulmonary dead space fraction may be an independent predictor of mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome (5). Therefore, its measurement may be important on the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the technical and time-consuming nature of measurement of VDalv prevents its routine use on the ICU.

Nunn and Hill (6) have suggested that there is a relationship between the arterial to end-tidal CO2 tension gradient (Pa-E'CO2) and the Vdalv fraction, but they did not investigate this relationship. In a previous investigation we used simple physiological modeling to examine the relationship between Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and VDalv, calculated in the conventional manner using Fowler’s technique and Enghoff’s modification of the Bohr equation, expressed a fraction of alveolar tidal volume: (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler. We concluded in that investigation Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 had a roughly constant, linear relationship with (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler as follows: (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler = 1.14 x Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 - 0.005, and that it could be substituted acceptably for the conventional calculation (7).

This investigation uses physiological models of much greater sophistication than those used previously. The advances in modeling that have made re-evaluation important are detailed in the Appendix. Our aims were:

  1. To examine the relationship between Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler.
  2. To determine the susceptibility of Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and of (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler to change induced by coincidental variation of physiological factors during a constant alveolar configuration (i.e., constant pulmonary ventilation and perfusion distributions). Such change is misleading because it causes the appearance of a change in alveolar configuration when such a change has not occurred. The better, independent measure of alveolar configuration is less susceptible to variation.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Physiological Models
The models used in this investigation are based on the published and validated Nottingham Physiological Simulator (9–12). Briefly, the models are iterative, mass conserving, and arithmetical (rather than calculus based). The most fundamental processes of molecular movement and physical behavior, such as the constancy of pressure x volume/temperature, were used to construct discrete program subunits, which are run repeatedly, with each iteration generating the tiny changes that have occurred since the last microsecond "time-slice." These high-fidelity models are described in greater detail separately (13). The models have been validated for the performance of this investigation, and in particular, the poly-laminar series dead space and the poly-compartmental ventilation-perfusion (VQ) aspects have been demonstrated to be robust and realistic (13).

Experimental setup.
The model was configured as follows: weight 75 kg, height 1.75 m, supine posture, inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2) 21%, inspired CO2 fraction (FICO2) 0.1%, inspired gas temperature 37°C, inspired water fraction 6.2% (saturated at 37°C), cardiac index 2.73 L/min/m-2, oxygen consumption 250 mL/min (VO2), respiratory quotient 0.8, anatomical dead space volume (VDanat) 65 mL (6), fixed (anatomical) pulmonary shunt 1% of cardiac output, ventilatory rate 12 breaths/min, inspired tidal volume (VT) 500 mL. The sampling interval (see Appendix) was set to 1 ms and internal mass-conservation and error checking were enabled. The model included 500 "alveolar" gas-exchanging compartments and 250 series dead space laminae.

Estimation of VDalv/VTalv.
VDanat was derived by geometrically dividing the PCO2 versus time capnogram, as per Fowler’s technique (14). Physiological dead space (VDphys) was calculated using Enghoff’s modification of the Bohr equation (15,16). (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler was estimated from the output of the model in the conventional manner: VDalv/VTalv = ((1 - (PE'CO2/PaCO2) x VTexh) -VDanat)/(VTexh - VDanat), where PE'CO2 represents the mixed expired CO2 tension and VTexh is the exhaled VT.

Patterns of VQ mismatch.
The relationship between (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler and Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 was examined in the presence of three patterns of VQ mismatching. Each pattern of mismatch was created by varying the compartmental bronchiolar resistances and the compartmental arteriolar resistances in opposite directions, generating asynchronous alveolar ventilation and a realistic scatter of VQ ratios as follows:

Factor variation.
Three factors were each varied independently to examine their effect on (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler and on Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2. The factors, each of which had been found to cause significant disturbance in the relationship between VDalv and the Pa-E'CO2 gradient in our previous investigation, were as follows:

Each examination used a re-initialized scenario and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler and Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 were recorded after complete equilibration had been achieved for both CO2 and O2 (defined as total body CO2 and O2 flux <0.1 mL/min each).

The distribution of variation induced in (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler and Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 are expressed as 95% confidence intervals of the variation: CI95% = mean (N(i = 1 to n) - N0) ± 1.95 x SD (N(i = 1 to n) - N0), where mean (N(i = 1 to n) - N0) is the mean of the variation from baseline and where N0 is the original value before coincidental physiological variation.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Normal conditions.
Under normal physiological conditions (VCO2 200 mL/min, shunt 1% of cardiac output, and VDanat 65 mL) while the VQ defect was varied, Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 had a linear relationship with (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler; it was consistently 59.5% of (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler (Fig. 1). The CI95% of the error in calculating (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler from Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 using this formula was -13.0% to 11.5% in normal physiological conditions and -32.3% to 32.5% over all physiological conditions tested.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The relationship between arterial-end-tidal CO2 gradient/arterial CO2 tension (Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2) and alveolar deadspace/alveolar tidal volume, calculated conventionally using Fowler’s technique and the Bohr equation - (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler. Solid lines show the behavior of Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler during conditions that were constant other than changing alveolar configuration (i.e., changing VDalv). Dashed lines show the effect on Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler of independently varying VCO2 while alveolar configuration remained constant. The vertical displacement along the dashed line reflects the change in alveolar configuration misleadingly implied by Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and the horizontal displacement reflects the change in alveolar configuration misleadingly implied by conventionally calculated VDalv/VTalv.

 
CO2 production.
Variation in CO2 production (from 200 mL/min down to 100 mL/min and up to 300 mL/min) had very small effects on Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and on (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler (Fig. 1). The CI95% of the induced variation are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Variation Induced in Arterial-End-Tidal CO2 Gradient/Arterial CO2 Tension (Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2) and in Alveolar Deadspace/Alveolar Tidal Volume (Calculated Conventionally Using Fowler’s Technique and the Bohr Equation) During Coincidental Variation of Physiological Factors
 
Fixed shunt fraction.
Increasing fixed, pulmonary shunt fraction (from 1% of cardiac output to 15%, then 30%) in the presence of a constant alveolar configuration caused similar increases in Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler (Fig. 2). The CI95% of the induced variation are shown in Table 1.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The relationship between arterial-end-tidal CO2 gradient/arterial CO2 tension (Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2) and alveolar deadspace/alveolar tidal volume, calculated conventionally using Fowler’s technique and the Bohr equation - (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler. Solid lines show the behavior of Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler during conditions that were constant other than changing alveolar configuration (i.e., changing VDalv). Dashed lines show the effect on Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler of independently varying fixed pulmonary shunt fractio, while alveolar configuration remained constant. The vertical displacement along the dashed line reflects the change in alveolar configuration misleadingly implied by Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and the horizontal displacement reflects the change in alveolar configuration misleadingly implied by conventionally calculated VDalv/VTalv.

 
Anatomical dead space volume.
An increase in anatomical dead space volume in the presence of a constant alveolar configuration significantly increased Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 but reduced (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler (Fig. 3). The CI95% of the induced variation are shown in Table 1.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The relationship between arterial-end-tidal CO2 gradient/arterial CO2 tension (Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2) and alveolar dead space/alveolar tidal volume, calculated conventionally using Fowler’s technique and the Bohr equation - (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler. Solid lines show the behavior of Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler during conditions that were constant other than changing alveolar configuration (i.e., changing VDalv). Dashed lines show the effect on Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler of independently varying anatomical dead space volume while alveolar configuration remained constant. The vertical displacement along the dashed line reflects the change in alveolar configuration misleadingly implied Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and the horizontal displacement reflects the change in alveolar configuration misleadingly implied by conventionally calculated VDalv/VTalv.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
Although increasing fixed shunt fraction did not significantly alter the relationship between Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler, it created a "virtual" dead space in both. This is in agreement with our previous study (7) and with previous clinical investigations (17–19). Correction may be made for the influence of changing fixed shunt fraction by estimating shunt fraction using iso-shunt diagrams (20) or a physiological model (10).

Our methodology included the maintenance of nonshunted cardiac output while fixed shunt fraction varied. Clearly, reality is far less simple, and one cannot expect a patient to maintain their nonshunted pulmonary blood flow; this was necessary. If shunt is increased while cardiac output is unchanged then nonshunted blood flow decreases, automatically increasing the mean VQ ratio and thereby increasing VDalv. In our study, nonshunted blood flow was maintained during increasing venous admixture to keep alveolar configuration (and VDalv) constant, allowing examination of the robustness of measures representing VDalv during changing venous admixture.

The dependence of the apparent VDalv on the VDanat has been noted previously in an elegant investigation using a four-compartment lung model (21). This model predicted that various combinations of serial and parallel dead spaces that should add up to identical VDphys values as calculated using Enghoff’s modification of the Bohr equation in fact produced differing VDphys values. This area requires further investigation using high fidelity modeling.

The dependence of both Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler on VDanat does not imply the superiority of either method of representing VDalv, but highlights a potential problem with both. Large changes in VDanat are rare in clinical practice, and when such variations occur they are usually easily noted, and a change in the trend in Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 may be anticipated. The most important scenario in this context is probably that of VDanat conforming to a fraction of changing VT (6).

Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 and (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler differ numerically, and although a conversion formula may be used as described in Results, it is probably unnecessary. Indeed, it is probably inappropriate because large variation was observed in the relationship between the two measures during physiological variation.

It is clear that, despite constant alveolar configuration, (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler is susceptible to variation while other physiological factors vary. Therefore, (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler is not an independent representation of alveolar configuration. The question of whether (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler or Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 is closer to the "truth" is difficult to answer. If lungs were constructed in a fashion similar to Riley’s original lung model (22), consisting of a single dead space volume, a shunted volume, and an optimally ventilated and perfused volume, then there would be a simple, correct answer, but in the presence of a continuous distribution of variably perfused and ventilated alveoli the answer is less clear. The most clinically applicable measure is probably that whichever is most independent of coincidental physiological variation. As (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler is marginally more robust in the presence of variation in VDanat then it may be considered the superior measure. However, calculation of (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler requires the collection and analysis of expired gas (over a significant time period), the calculation of VDanat using a partial pressure versus volume capnogram and arterial gas tension analysis. Calculation of Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2, however, requires only measurement of Pa-E'CO2 tension. Additionally, Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 may be updated in real time. The appropriate use of Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 may include its daily calculation on the ICU as an estimate of disease progression or to assess the efficacy of interventions. It is obvious that use of Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 should not replace the use of (VDalv/VTalv)Bohr-Fowler, but its simplicity of calculation may allow easier clinical application of VDalv estimation. Indeed, its ease of use may encourage the more widespread use of VDalv monitoring to quantify disease progression and to assess the effects of interventions.

It is probably inappropriate to refer to Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 as the "alveolar dead space fraction" because this is widely accepted as being represented by the conventional calculation. It may be more appropriate to refer to it by its formula if it is recorded in trends in daily ICU patient management. It is widely recognized that the VDphys, calculated using Enghoff’s modification of Bohr’s equation, does not refer to any discrete part of the respiratory system, and has been termed by some the "Bohr" dead space (23).

The limitations of this investigation include the following:

  1. The use of only three discrete VQ defects. Clearly, the patient population includes a near-infinite number of discrete VQ defects. Our models were chosen to represent large, heterogeneous groups rather than individuals, and we expect that each defect modeled will adequately represent patients whose VQ defects are similar. The results of this investigation may not be applicable to those patients whose VQ defects are grossly dissimilar to those examined in this investigation. This includes patients with the most severe lung pathology, whose VQ configurations we have not reproduced in this study.
  2. The use of a limited number of alveolar compartments (500) and series dead space laminae (250). This is unlikely to represent a serious flaw, and will achieve greater accuracy than any other currently investigated pulmonary model.
  3. The use of a mathematical model rather than a patient group. This criticism may be directed at any investigation using mathematical modeling. However, the stratification of physiological factors that was crucial to this investigation could not be performed in vivo. The modeling used in this investigation included dynamic and static lung inhomogeneity. Viscoelasticity, nonsynchronous alveolar exhalation, poly-laminar dead space, poly-compartmental lung and micro-timeslicing all contributed to a very credible, high-fidelity model of pulmonary physiology. In addition, performance of this investigation in vivo would be very difficult because achieving CO2 equilibrium after changes in physiological factors would take too long for the investigation to be feasible (24). Finally, it is impossible in vivo to vary a physiological value independently. Without this independent variation, clear conclusions of causal relationships cannot be drawn, particularly within a heterogeneous patient group.
  4. Other techniques of VDalv estimation. A further criticism that may be leveled at this investigation is that VDalv may be measured almost in real-time using a technique of continuous expired gas analysis, such as the single-breath CO2 test (25). Therefore, why should we require a further method of quantifying alveolar configuration? First, most ICUs do not have a single-breath CO2 analyzer, and thus cannot use that method. Second, the technique of single-breath capnographic VDalv quantification is validated only in animals and has not been demonstrated to be independent of variation in the factors presented here, such as VDanat. VDalv measured by the single-breath test may, in fact, be just as variable as either of the measures presented in this investigation.

Several conclusions drawn from this modeling investigation contrast with conclusions based on our previous investigation in this area (7). These differences are explained by the increase in complexity and fidelity of the modeling. However, several of our previous conclusions are supported by this investigation, and this includes the recommendation Pa-E'CO2/PaCO2 may be useful in clinical practice, particularly as a monitor of trends in pulmonary condition.


    Appendix
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 
The following advances in physiological modeling make re-evaluation of this topic important:


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix
 References
 

  1. Marini JJ. The physiologic determinants of ventilator dependence. Resp Care 1986; 31: 271–82.
  2. Shikora SA, Bistrian BR, Borlase BC, et al. Work of breathing: reliable predictor of weaning and extubation. Crit Care Med 1990; 18: 157–62.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Domsky M, Wilson RF, Heins J. Intraoperative end-tidal carbon dioxide values and derived calculations correlated with outcome: prognosis and capnography. Crit Care Med 1995; 23: 1497–503.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Jellinek H, Hiesmayr M, Simon P, et al. Arterial to end-tidal CO2 tension difference after bilateral lung transplantation. Crit Care Med 1993; 21: 1035–40.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Nuckton TJ, Alonso JA, Kallet RH, et al. Pulmonary dead-space fraction as a risk factor for death in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1281–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Nunn JF, Hill DW. Respiratory dead space and arterial to end-tidal CO2 tension difference in anaesthetized man. J Appl Physiol 1960; 15: 383–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hardman JG, Aitkenhead AR. Estimation of alveolar deadspace fraction using arterial and end-tidal CO2: a factor analysis using a physiology simulation. Anaesth Intensive Care 1999; 27: 452–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Folkow B, Pappenheimer JR. Components of the respiratory deadspace and their variation with pressure breathing and with broncho-active drugs. J Appl Physiol 1955; 8: 102.[Free Full Text]
  9. Hardman JG, Bedforth NM, Ahmed AB, et al. A physiology simulator: validation of its respiratory components and its ability to predict the patient’s response to changes in mechanical ventilation. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 327–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hardman JG, Bedforth NM. Estimating venous admixture using a physiological simulator. Br J Anaesth 1998; 82: 346–9.
  11. Bedforth NM, Hardman JG. Predicting patients’ responses to changes in mechanical ventilation: a comparison between physicians and a physiological simulation. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 839–42.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Hardman JG, Wills JS, Aitkenhead AR. Investigating hypoxemia during apnea: validation of a set of physiological models. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 614–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hardman JG, Aitkenhead AR. Validation of an original mathematical lung model - application to carbon dioxide elimination and deadspace ventilation. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1840–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fowler WS. Lung function studies. II. The respiratory deadspace Am J Physiol 1948; 154: 405.[Free Full Text]
  15. Englhoff H. Volumen inefecax. Bemerkungen zur Frage des schaedlichen Raumes. Uppsala Läk För Förh 1938; 44: 191–218.
  16. Nunn JF. Applied respiratory physiology. 4th ed. London, UK: Butterworths, 1993.
  17. Fletcher R. Invasive and non-invasive measurement of the respiratory deadspace in anaesthetized children with cardiac disease. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 442–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Fletcher R. Relationship between alveolar deadspace and arterial oxygenation in children with congenital cardiac disease. Br J Anaesth 1989; 62: 168–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Fletcher R. Deadspace during anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990; 34: 46–50.[Web of Science]
  20. Benatar SR, Hewlett AM, Nunn JF. The use of iso-shunt lines for control of oxygen therapy. Br J Anaesth 1973; 45: 711–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Petrini MF, Robertson HT, Hlastala MP. Interaction of series and parallel dead space in the lung. Respir Physiol 1983; 54: 121–36.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Riley RL. Analysis of factors affecting partial pressures of O2 and CO2 in gas and blood of lungs. J Appl Physiol 1951; 4: 102–20.[Free Full Text]
  23. Fletcher R. Airway deadspace, end-tidal CO2 and Christian Bohr. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1984; 28: 408.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Ivanov SD, Nunn JF. Influence of duration of hyperventilation on rise time of PCO2 after step reduction of ventilation. Respir Physiol 1968; 4: 23.
  25. Arnold JH, Thompson JE, Arnold LW. Single breath CO2 analysis: Description and validation of a method. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 96–102.[Web of Science][Medline]
Accepted for publication July 21, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C-C. Balick-Weber, P. Nicolas, M. Hedreville-Montout, P. Blanchet, and F. Stephan
Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of volume-controlled vs pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: a cross-over study with echocardiographic assessment
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2007; 99(3): 429 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. S. Syring, C. M. Otto, R. E. Spivack, K. Markstaller, and J. E. Baumgardner
Maintenance of end-expiratory recruitment with increased respiratory rate after saline-lavage lung injury
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2007; 102(1): 331 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardman, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Aitkenhead, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardman, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Aitkenhead, A. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press