JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kober, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoerauf, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kober, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoerauf, K.

Anesth Analg 2004;98:206-210
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society


CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

Capnography in Non-Tracheally Intubated Emergency Patients as an Additional Tool in Pulse Oximetry for Prehospital Monitoring of Respiration

Alexander Kober, MD*,{ddagger}, Barbara Schubert, BS*, Petra Bertalanffy, MD*,{ddagger}, Laszlo Gorove, MD{dagger}, Tivadar Puskas, MD{dagger}, Burkhard Gustorff, MD{ddagger}, Alma Joldzo, BS{ddagger}, and Klaus Hoerauf, MD, PhD{ddagger} Section Editor

*Vienna Red Cross, Van Swieten and the Research Institute of the Vienna Red Cross, Vienna, Austria; {dagger}Hungarian National Emergency Service, Hungary; and the {ddagger}Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Klaus Hoerauf, Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, University Hospital of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria, Europe. Address email to klaus.hoerauf{at}univie.ac.at


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Victims of minor trauma transported by paramedic-based rescue systems are usually monitored with pulse oximetry. Under the difficult surroundings of prehospital trauma care, pulse oximeters show considerable periods of malfunction. We tested the hypothesis that capnography is a good, easy to use tool for monitoring in nonintubated trauma victims. Seventy nonintubated trauma victims were included in this study. Vital variables and number and time of malfunctions were sampled for oximeter and capnometer recordings. Total number of alerts (63 versus 10), number of alerts per patient (3.3 [1.9] versus 0.3 [0.9]) (mean [SD]), total time of malfunction (191.5 [216.7] s versus 11.8 [40.2] s), time of malfunction per alarm (58.3 [71.4] s versus 5.5 [14.6] s), and the percentage of malfunction time during transport (13.2% [15.3%] versus 0.8% [2.8%]) differed significantly (P < 0.01) between oximetry and capnography. Although pulse oximetry is a standard method of monitoring in emergency care, we found capnography to be helpful as a monitoring device. We consequently recommend the use of capnography on transport as an additional monitoring tool to reduce periods lacking supervision of the vital variables.

IMPLICATIONS: Capnography is a useful tool to improve respiratory monitoring in nonintubated trauma victims on emergency transport and an easy to use supplement to pulse oximetry.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Continuous monitoring of vital variables in patients on emergency transport is desirable, especially in paramedic-based rescue systems. Monitoring possibilities are 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), noninvasive blood pressure measurements, and counting the pulse frequency at the arteria radialis (1). Oxygenation and pulse rate could be monitored by pulse oximetry (2).

The continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation in emergency patients is especially important, as many of these patients suffer from various coexisting medical and surgical problems that may lead to respiratory depression.

Because pulse oximeters provide instantaneous, noninvasive, in vivo measurement of arterial oxygenation by determining the absorption light of different wavelengths of the blood, pulse oximetry has rapidly become a standard in prehospital emergency medicine in the last 10 yr.

Pulse oximeters require adequate plethysmographic pulsations to distinguish arterial blood light absorption from background venous blood and tissue light absorption (3). Studies in clinical and ambulance settings have demonstrated that hypothermia and vasoconstriction might critically impair peripheral perfusion and thus plethysmographic pulsation and the portion of total signal used to detect hemoglobin saturation (4). Another problem in reading accuracy is associated with the conditions of prehospital emergency care, especially the rapid car movements during rescue transport (5,6). Recently, a volunteer study demonstrated a wide difference in pulse oximeter performance under motion conditions (7). In a clinical study, we could show that time of malfunction was more than 20% of the total transport time, even though the pulse oximeter used was classified as motion-resistant (8).

Another option for continuous monitoring would be an online recording of exhaled CO2. Exhaled air is usually sampled by means of an infrared analyzer. Although this method is accurate in most clinical settings, cardiovascular abnormalities (e.g., congenital heart diseases) and technical sampling malfunctions (e.g., line obstructions) are known potential error sources (9). However, determination of CO2 is standard for ventilated patients (10), and some efforts have been made to monitor spontaneously breathing patients in clinical settings (9,11,12). Currently, there are no data regarding the prehospital monitoring of nonintubated emergency patients by noninvasive capnography.

OxyArmTM represents a new technology with the appearance of a telephone headset, delivering oxygen without the constraints of a conventional oxygen delivery device (Fig. 1) (13,14). A new feature of a newly redesigned Oxyarm device is the possibility to perform end-expiratory capnography in an open system with spontaneously breathing patients. Exhaled CO2 can therefore be measured by a portable infrared analyzer attached to the Oxyarm, as demonstrated recently by Paul et al. (15).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The Oxyarm CapnoPlus device. Arrows indicate air flow.

 
Although pulse oximetry and capnometry measure different functions of the respiratory system (oximetry determines oxygenation, whereas capnometry monitors ventilation with a good correlation between ETCO2 with arterial PCO2), there could be an additional benefit in using further monitoring systems to improve quality of patient care.

Therefore, we designed this study to test the hypothesis that ETCO2measured through Oxyarm would give us additional information regarding the frequency of respiration. Second, it was our aim to show that the new Oxyarm device is easy for paramedics to handle and does not impair patients’ comfort. Finally, we wanted to find out if supplemental monitoring with capnography reduces periods of interruption in emergency monitoring.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
After approval of our institutional ethics committee, as well as verbal and written documented consent, 70 patients older than 19 yr of age with ASA physical status I–III, suffering from minor trauma (Injury Severity Score <10) and undergoing transportation by the National Hungarian Ambulance Service, were enrolled in the prospective study. Inclusion criteria were stable hemodynamic and respiratory conditions, minor pain (<4 of 10 on a visual analog scale [VAS]), and minor trauma. Patients who were suffering from life-threatening trauma, who were in need of pharmacological pain control (VAS >4), or who had any medical history of respiratory or neurological disease or thoracic or neurosurgical trauma, were transported by a physician-based ambulance, and therefore excluded from this study.

At the injury scene, one investigator who was not involved in the study as an author of the publication determined whether the patients were suitable for this study and obtained consent for participation. Routine care, such as bandaging of injuries and of splinting fractures, was administered. Every patient received a pulse oximeter (8500A; Nonin, Plymouth, MN) on the second finger of his/her right hand and an Oxyarm device (Oxyarm CapnoPlus; Southmedic, Barrie, ON) on his/her head. The Oxyarm was connected to an oxygen delivery system (4 L oxygen per minute) and to a capnography device (NPB-75; Tyco Healthcare, Vienna, Austria). With the capnometer we did not measure exact values of ETCO2. It was used only to get information about the frequency of respiration.

As previous studies demonstrated that the quality of pulse oximeter readings was dependent on patients’ temperature, tympanic temperatures were recorded from Mon-a-Therm digital thermometers (Mallinckrodt Anesthesiology Products, St. Louis, MO). Another thermocouple positioned nearby the patient’s head recorded the ambient car temperature. Skin sensors (Mallinckrodt Anesthesiology Products) were placed on the forearm and the finger to register indirect signs of vasodilation (finger warmer than forearm) or vasoconstriction (forearm warmer than finger).

Morphometric characteristics and the type of injury were recorded. Noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate measurements were performed on entering the ambulance and again on arrival at the destination hospital. All measurements were recorded by the same independent investigator.

During transport, the number and duration of the alerts of the pulse oximeter and of the capnometer were recorded. An alert was defined as a period of time where the monitoring device could not show any value resulting in the "technical error" alert sound of the device for more than 15 s. All alerts were recorded automatically by an IBM-compatible laptop via serial port and directly transferred in a datasheet file (Excel XP; Microsoft, Redmond, WA). The recorded alert data could not be seen by the paramedics as their information was password saved. The extraction of the file was performed by an investigator not otherwise involved in the trial.

Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with the Oxyarm device and with the finger clip on a 100 mm VAS (0 = maximum comfort and 100 = maximum discomfort). Moreover, the patients were asked to use the same VAS to rate their subjective feeling of oppression by the device. Finally, the patients were asked if they thought that providing additional oxygen supply and monitoring simultaneously in one device, as done by the Oxyarm, was positive for them. This question was answered "yes" or "no".

The paramedics themselves rated the practicability of the new device on the same subjective score.

We calculated that we needed 70 patients to detect a 25% difference in time of malfunction with a common standard deviation of the twofold difference at the P < 0.05 level and at least 80% power. Normally distributed, continuous data were compared with analysis of variance, and nonparametric data were compared by the use of Mann-Whitney U-test. Data are presented as mean ± SD; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We studied 45 male and 25 female patients suffering from minor trauma. Patients had ASA physical status I (n = 21), II (n = 41), or III (n = 8). They weighed (mean ± SD) 73 ± 20 kg, measured 167 ± 10 cm, and were 68 ± 16 yr old. The duration of transport was 24.3 ± 2.2 min, ambient car temperature during transport was 22.4°C ± 1.3°C. The hemodynamic variables were stable during transport and are listed in Table 1. All patients were vasoconstricted at the site of emergency and during the whole period of transportation. Patients were not actively warmed and received no warmed infusions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Morphometric Data at the Beginning and the End of Transportation
 
In all patients we were able to measure the frequency of respiration during transportation with the capnometer. Patients’ satisfaction with capnography was 12.8 ± 3.1 on a 100-mm VAS. This satisfaction was comparable (P = 0.61) to the patients’ satisfaction with the SpO2 fingerclip (16.1 ± 5.2). There was no significant difference in the patients’ feelings of oppression with the Oxyarm or fingerclip (22.8 ± 8.9 versus 19.2 ± 11.4; P = 0.76). Fifty-six patients voted that additional oxygen supply by their monitoring device (Oxyarm) was positive, 13 answered this question with "no," and one patient was unsure on this point and declined to answer this question. Paramedics scored both methods of monitoring (Oxyarm and fingerclip) as not significantly different in their ease of use (9.3 ± 5.7 versus 8.5 ± 6.2; P = 0.89).

The total number of alerts, alerts per patient, total time of malfunction, time of malfunction per alarm, and the percentage of malfunction time during transport were significantly (P < 0.01) less with capnography compared with oximetry (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Variables of Malfunction of Oximetry and Capnography
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hypoxemia is an important issue in prehospital trauma care and may be underestimated without the help of additional monitoring such as pulse oximetry (16). Therefore, pulse oximetry has become a routine method of monitoring in prehospital care (17). However, our recently published data question the reliability of these devices in the emergency setting (8). The main reasons for this are vasoconstriction (6) and nonoptimal function of the light emissions diode of the device in a nonstable environment (18). Therefore, there is a need for additional monitoring to get optimal security for the observation of respiration.

Clinical trials of respiratory monitoring researched many benefits of capnography in nonintubated patients, as it provides information about each breath; under relatively stable conditions there is a correlation of ETCO2 measurements to arterial PaCO2 in nonintubated patients (19). Even if this relation can be questioned in trauma rescue, capnography gives additional information on the patient’s respiratory status. If the patient stops breathing, the ETCO2 concentration decreases rapidly to the baseline level (20). This allows a rapid detection of respiratory failure on transport even before SpO2 decreases.

Consequently, capnography increases the safety margins in prehospital care (21,22). Usually, pharyngeal catheters are necessary to obtain reliable results (23,24). The major advantage of the Oxyarm used in the present study was that it provided the option of noninvasive ETCO2 online measurement to detect respiratory frequency, while providing simultaneous oxygen delivery.

This study shows three major findings: first, we showed that this technique using the Oxyarm is well accepted by the patients and easy to use by paramedics. Patients feel no oppression by the device and have a positive subjective feeling with the combination of oxygen inhalation and monitoring. Second, measuring respiratory frequency was possible in all patients. Finally, from a technical point of view capnography is a more reliable measurement than pulse oxymetry in the emergency setting, with many fewer false alerts, and guarantees constant monitoring with almost no interruptions.

Our data fit in well with results of clinical studies investigating capnography in spontaneously breathing patients. These studies showed that capnography can be used in the hospital setting to monitor the adequacy of spontaneous ventilation not only during general anesthesia and recovery but also in the awake unintubated patient, either in the intensive care unit or during regional anesthesia. ETCO2 monitoring can serve as an apnea monitor. However, the major limiting factor is the admixture of end-tidal gas with air or insufflated oxygen, resulting in a falsely low PETCO2, particularly in patients breathing through the mouth (9,11,12,20,23,25–28).

However, the main focus in this trial was to determine the practicability of capnography under the difficult circumstances of prehospital rescue. Our data show that this technique on transport reduces the number of monitoring-free periods in a significant and clinically important way. Paramedics and emergency physicians actively involved in prehospital rescue are aware that frequent alerts of the pulse oximeter have certain negative effects on the quality of daily patient care. Frequent "malfunction" alerts might affect concentration, drawing the paramedic’s attention away from the clinical aspect to the monitor. This might lead to misinterpretation and underestimation of the importance of these alerts. Consequently, there might be a risk of underestimation of a potentially dangerous situation such as hypoxemia. This risk is further increased when a patient is not transported by a physician but by paramedics, who might not be as quick to detect hypoxemia from clinical signs.

We are convinced that pulse oximetry is an important addition to the security of our patients and should be used in as many cases as possible; however, because of its limitations in difficult surroundings, it should be supplemented by noninvasive capnography to reduce monitoring-free periods to a minimum.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Stewart RD. Advances in prehospital immediate care. Resuscitation 1989; 18: 13–20.
  2. Cydulka RK, Shade B, Emerman CL, et al. Prehospital pulse oximetry: useful or misused? Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 675–9.[Medline]
  3. Phillips GD, Runciman WB, Ilsley AH. Monitoring in emergency medicine. Resuscitation 1989; 18: 21–35.[Medline]
  4. Trivedi N, Ghouri A, Lai E, et al. Pulse oximeter performance during desaturation and resaturation: a comparison of seven models. J Clin Anesth 1997; 9: 184–8.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Silverston P. Pulse oximetry at the roadside: a study of pulse oximetry in immediate care. BMJ 1989; 298: 711–3.
  6. Trivedi N, Ghouri A, Shah N, et al. Effects of motion, ambient light, and hypoperfusion on pulse oximeter function. J Clin Anesth 1997; 9: 179–83.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Barker S. "Motion-resistant" pulse oximetry: a comparison of new and old models. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 967–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kober A, Scheck T, Lieba F, et al. The influence of active warming on signal quality of pulse oximetry in prehospital trauma care. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 961–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Friesen RH, Alswang M. End-tidal PCO2 monitoring via nasal cannulae in pediatric patients: accuracy and sources of error. J Clin Monit 1996; 12: 155–9.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Grenier B, Verchere E, Mesli A, et al. Capnography monitoring during neurosurgery: reliability in relation to various intraoperative positions. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 43–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Abramo TJ, Wiebe RA, Scott SM, et al. Noninvasive capnometry in a pediatric population with respiratory emergencies. Pediatr Emerg Care 1996; 12: 252–4.[Medline]
  12. Liu SY, Lee TS, Bongard F. Accuracy of capnography in nonintubated surgical patients. Chest 1992; 102: 1512–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ling E, McDonald L, Dinesen TR, DuVall D. The OxyArm—a new minimal contact oxygen delivery system for mouth or nose breathing. Can J Anaesth 2002; 49: 297–301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fleischhackl R, Doerner C, Scheck T, et al. Reduction of motion sickness in prehospital trauma care. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 373–7.[Medline]
  15. Paul J, Ling E, Hajgato J, McDonald L. Both the Oxyarm and the Capnoxygen mask provide clinically useful capnographic monitoring capability in volunteers. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50: 137–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Brown LH, Manring EA, Kornegay HB, Prasad NH. Can prehospital personnel detect hypoxemia without the aid of pulse oximeters? Am J Emerg Med 1996; 14: 43–4.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Soubani A. Noninvasive monitoring of oxygen and carbon dioxide. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19: 141–6.[Medline]
  18. Valko PC, Campbell JP, McCarty DL, et al. Prehospital use of pulse oximetry in rotary-wing aircraft. Prehospital Disaster Med 1991; 6: 421–8.[Medline]
  19. Barton CW, Wang ES. Correlation of end-tidal CO2 measurements to arterial PaCO2 in nonintubated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 23: 560–3.[ISI][Medline]
  20. Palmon SC, Liu M, Moore LE, Kirsch JR. Capnography facilitates tight control of ventilation during transport. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 608–11.[ISI][Medline]
  21. Singh S, Venkataraman ST, Saville A, Bhende MS. NPB-75: a portable quantitative microstream capnometer. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19: 208–10.[ISI][Medline]
  22. Petroianu GA, Junker HM, Maleck WH, Rufer R. A portable quantitative capnometer in test. Am J Emerg Med 1996; 14: 586–7.[Medline]
  23. Oberg B, Waldau T, Larsen VH. The effect of nasal oxygen flow and catheter position on the accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements by a pharyngeal catheter in unintubated, spontaneously breathing subjects. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 695–8.[Medline]
  24. Waldau T, Oberg B, Larsen VH. Reliability of CO2 measurements from the airway by a pharyngeal catheter in unintubated, spontaneously breathing subjects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 637–42.[Medline]
  25. Arnold JH, Stenz RI, Grenier B, et al. Noninvasive determination of cardiac output in a model of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 864–8.[Medline]
  26. Arnold JH, Thompson JE, Arnold LW. Single breath CO2 analysis: description and validation of a method. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 96–102.[ISI][Medline]
  27. Donnelly JA, Smith EA, Hope AT, Alexander RJ. An assessment of portable carbon dioxide monitors during interhospital transfer. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 703–5.[ISI][Medline]
  28. Maleck WH, Petroianu GA, Toomes LM, et al. Another portable quantitative capnometer. Am J Emerg Med 1998; 16: 399–400.[Medline]
Accepted for publication July 23, 2003.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kober, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoerauf, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kober, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoerauf, K.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press