JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuitunen, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Salmenperä, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuitunen, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Salmenperä, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Blood
Right arrow Heart
Right arrow Resuscitation

Anesth Analg 2004;98:291-297
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000096006.60716.F6


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Hydroxyethyl Starch as a Priming Solution for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Impairs Hemostasis After Cardiac Surgery

Anne H. Kuitunen, MD PhD*, Markku J. Hynynen, MD PhD{dagger}, Elina Vahtera, PhilL{ddagger}, and Markku T. Salmenperä, MD PhD*

*Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; {dagger}Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Jorvi Hospital, Espoo, Finland; and {ddagger}Finnish Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service, Helsinki, Finland

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Anne H. Kuitunen, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 340 (Haartmaninkatu 4), FIN-00029 HUS, Finland. Address e-mail to anne.kuitunen{at}hus.fi


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We investigated the influence of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) as a priming solution for the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit on postoperative hemostasis in 45 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. In a randomized sequence, 20 mL/kg of low-molecular-weight HES (HES 120; molecular weight 120,000 daltons), high-molecular-weight HES (HES 400; molecular weight 400,000 daltons), or 4% human albumin (ALB) was used as the main component of the CPB priming solution. The thromboelastographic values indicating the speed of solid clot formation ({alpha}-angle) and the strength of the fibrin clot (maximum amplitude and shear elastic modulus) were decreased up to 2 h after CPB in both HES groups. Four hours after the operation, blood loss through the chest tubes had increased in the HES groups: HES 120, mean 804 mL (range, 330–1390 mL); HES 400, mean 1008 mL (range, 505–1955 mL); and ALB, mean 681 mL (range, 295–1500 mL) (P < 0.05 between the HES 400 and ALB groups). We conclude that HES solutions, when given in doses of 20 mL/kg in connection with the CPB prime, compromise hemostasis after cardiac surgery. This effect appears related to formation of a less stable thrombus compared with that formed in the presence of ALB.

IMPLICATIONS: The influence of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on postoperative hemostasis was investigated in cardiac surgery. The thromboelastographic values indicated that HES solutions, when given in connection with the cardiopulmonary bypass prime, compromise hemostasis after cardiac surgery. This effect seems to occur through the formation of a less stable clot.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Various crystalloid and colloidal solutions are used to prime the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit. The rationale for adding colloidal solutions to CPB prime is preservation of colloid osmotic pressure and, hence, less fluid retention (1). Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is as effective as albumin (ALB) as an intravascular volume expander (2). HES may also be a less expensive alternative to ALB as a colloidal solution. However, concerns remain about the adverse effects of HES on blood coagulation, especially when it is used in patients undergoing CPB. In these patients, the deleterious effects of the extracorporeal circulation per se already compromise effective hemostasis (3,4). The use of ALB does not seem to affect blood coagulation (5). ALB may even be advantageous when used in patients undergoing CPB, because preexposure of the synthetic surfaces of the CPB circuit to ALB decreases the affinity of platelets to these surfaces (2).

In this study, we compared the effects of HES and ALB on several hemostatic variables and postoperative blood loss when these solutions were used as the main component of the CPB prime solution in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Because it has been suggested that the effects of HES on coagulation are a function of the molecular weight (MW) (6), we used two different HES solutions: one a low-MW HES preparation (MW 120,000 daltons) and the other a high-MW solution (MW 400,000 daltons). Both HES solutions had a high degree of substitution (i.e., the ratio of hydroxyethyl groups to glucose residues was 0.7). The most deleterious effects on coagulation have been attributed to large and highly substituted HES molecules (7,8).


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Forty-five patients scheduled for elective primary coronary artery bypass grafting were included in the study. The Ethical Committee of the Department of Anesthesia accepted the study protocol, and all patients gave written, informed consent to participate in the study. Patients with preoperative coagulation disorders and medication with coumarin anticoagulants, heparin, or acetosalisylic acid within the previous 5 days were not included in the study.

Before surgery, the patients were allocated prospectively and in random order to one of the following groups with respect to the CPB circuit priming solution:

  1. The extracorporeal circuit was primed with 20 mL/kg of 4% ALB solution (4% ALB SPR®; Finnish Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service, Helsinki, Finland) (group ALB; n = 15).
  2. The priming solution consisted of 20 mL/kg of 6% low-MW HES solution (average MW 120,000 daltons; molar substitution ratio, 0.7; Plasmafusin®; Kabi Pharmacia AB, Uppsala, Sweden) (group HES 120; n = 15).
  3. The priming solution consisted of 20 mL/kg of 6% high-MW HES solution (average MW 400,000 daltons; molar substitution ratio, 0.7; Hespan®; DuPont Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) (group HES 400; n = 15).

In all groups, acetated Ringer’s solution was added up to a final priming volume of 2000 mL.

Patients were premedicated with lorazepam 0.06 mg/kg, given orally 2 h before the induction of anesthesia. The regular oral cardiovascular medications were given at the same time as the premedication. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 30 µg/kg, midazolam 0.15 mg/kg, and pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained until the end of operation with continuous infusions of fentanyl and midazolam (0.15 and 0.6 µg · kg-1 · min-1, respectively). When required, isoflurane was administered during the operation.

At least one arterial anastomosis (with left or right internal mammary artery or radial artery) was constructed in all patients, and additional anastomoses were completed with saphenous vein grafts. Myocardial protection consisted of an antegrade administration of crystalloid cardioplegia. The aorta was cross-clamped during suturing of the anastomoses.

During CPB, nonpulsatile pump flow and membrane oxygenation (Compactflo®; Dideco-Shiley, Modena, Italy) were used in conjunction with tepid systemic hypothermia (nasopharyngeal temperature of 32°C–34°C). Pump flow was maintained at 2.4 L · min-1 · m-2. For CPB, the patients received anticoagulation with porcine intestinal heparin 300 IU/kg, and 5000 IU of heparin was added to the priming solution. The activated clotting time (ACT) was kept >400 s during CPB. The bolus dose of protamine for neutralization of heparin effect was 1 mg/100 IU of the initial loading dose of heparin.

After CPB, the entire content of the extracorporeal circuit was collected in nonanticoagulated blood bags and returned to the patient. After surgery, the hematocrit was maintained at approximately 30% by giving packed red blood cells, acetated Ringer’s solution, or 4% ALB solution. If postoperative bleeding through the mediastinal tubes exceeded 200 mL/h, the ACT, platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time were determined. If the ACT was prolonged >10 s as compared with the value obtained 5 min after protamine administration, a supplemental dose of protamine (20 mg) was given. If the platelet count had decreased to <100 x 109/L, 8 U of platelets (one dose) were transfused. If the activated partial thromboplastin time or prothrombin time was prolonged >1.5 times the preoperative values, 2 U of fresh frozen plasma (one dose) were transfused. If, in the bleeding patient, none of the above-mentioned criteria was fulfilled, 1 g of tranexamic acid was given.

Blood loss through the chest tubes was measured from the time of sternal closure until 16 h after surgery, and the total hemoglobin loss was calculated from a sample of the blood loss collected during this postoperative period. The amount of blood products, ALB solution, and acetated Ringer’s solution transfused and the urine output were recorded during the same postoperative period. Blood hemoglobin concentration was determined on the first postoperative morning.

The plasma creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) fraction was determined, and new Q-wave changes on the electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded on the first postoperative morning. The durations of the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay were also recorded.

Blood samples for determination of the hemostatic variables were collected in plastic syringes through a radial artery catheter. Samples were obtained before heparinization, 0.5 h after CPB, and 2 h after CPB. Samples for coagulation factor analyses were immediately cooled on ice and centrifuged, and the plasma was stored at -70°C before being assayed.

The hemoglobin and platelet counts in the whole blood were determined by using a Cell-Dyn 610 hematology analyzer (Sequoia-Turner Corp., Mountain View, CA). Platelet adhesion was studied by measuring platelet retention on glass beads (Adeplat®; Semmelweis, Milano, Italy). Template bleeding time determination was performed on the volar surface of the forearm with a Simplate II® device (General Diagnostics, Organon Teknika, Turnout, Belgium). For the platelet aggregation studies, platelet-rich plasma was prepared by centrifuging citrated blood at 150g for 10 min, and platelet-poor plasma was prepared by centrifuging blood at 1400g for 30 min. The platelet count in the platelet-rich plasma was adjusted to 100–150 x 1009/L with autologous platelet-poor plasma. Aggregation (Payton Aggregometer; Payton Associates, Scarbrough, Ontario, Canada) was induced with adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Maximal platelet aggregation was defined as the maximum increase in light transmission after the addition of ADP (30 µmol/L). The concentration of ADP causing 50% of maximum aggregation was calculated. Plasma von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen was assayed by immunoelectrophoresis. Plasma factor VIII procoagulant activity (FVIII:C) was assayed with the one-stage kaolin-cephalin time method by utilizing FVIII:C-deficient plasma as a substrate. The FVIII:C-deficient plasma was obtained from a patient with severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C <0.01 IU/mL).

Thromboelastographic (TEG®) tracing (Hellige Co., Freiburg, Germany) was obtained from citrated whole blood. Coagulation was initiated by adding calcium chloride to the TEG® cuvettes. TEG® tracings were analyzed by measuring reaction time (r), coagulation time (r + k), clot formation rate ({alpha}-angle), maximum amplitude (MA), and shear elastic modulus [G = 5000 x MA/(100 - MA)].

The sample size was estimated by using a 2-sided {alpha} level of 0.05 and a power of 0.80. When a 20% decrease in the MA of TEG® tracing (TEG®:MA, i.e., the strength of the fibrin clot) with the use of HES solutions was assumed (3), the power analysis indicated that 15 patients needed to be included in each group. Analysis of variance for repeated measurements was applied within and between the groups. When significant differences (P < 0.05) were found, the Scheffé F test was used to seek significant contrasts. Single contrasts among the groups were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U-test and, in the event that discrete data were revealed, with the {chi}2 t-test. Associations between blood loss and hemostatic and TEG® variables were tested with analysis of simple and multiple linear regression. For the analyses, the values from all study groups were pooled. The stepwise selection procedure was applied in multiple linear regression analysis. Statistical calculations were performed with SAS software (SAS, Cary, NC). Results are given as the arithmetic means and the range.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The groups were similar with respect to the demographic characteristics and the data related to the operation (Table 1). CPB caused a decrease in the FVIII procoagulant activity in all study groups as measured at 0.5 h after CPB (Table 2). At 2 h after CPB, F VIII:C had increased to more than the baseline value in the ALB group, but not in the HES groups. The plasma level of vWF had decreased 0.5 h after CPB from the baseline value in all groups. At 2 h after CPB, the vWF levels had recovered to, or more than, the levels observed in the groups before CPB. Among the groups, there were no significant differences in the levels of vWF and FVIII:C.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic and Operative Data
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Plasma Levels of Clotting Factors and Thromboelastographic Tracings (TEG)®
 
The TEG® values indicating the initial fibrin formation (r time) and fibrin buildup (r + k time) did not change during the study period. The values of r and r + k were similar in all groups (Table 2). The TEG® values indicating the speed at which solid clot forms ({alpha}-angle) and the strength of the fibrin clot (MA and G) were depressed 0.5 and 2 h after CPB in both HES groups as compared with the ALB group.

CPB caused similar hemodilution (hemoglobin concentration in whole blood) in all groups (Table 3). The hemoglobin concentration and platelet count did not differ among the groups within the entire investigation period. The adhesion decreased 0.5 h after CPB in all groups but returned to the baseline 2 h after CPB. Platelet adhesion on glass beads did not differ among the groups at any sample time. The prolongation of the bleeding time was similar in all groups. The concentration of ADP causing 50% maximum aggregation did not differ among the groups at any sample time.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Hemoglobin and Platelet Measurements
 
Intraoperative blood loss and fluid balance did not differ among groups. The mean amount of fluids infused during the operation was 809 mL (range, 330–2300 mL) in the ALB group, 717 mL (range, 90–1650 mL) in the HES 120 group, and 481 mL (range, 100–1110 mL) in the HES 400 group. The number of reoperations and postoperative fluid balance data are presented in Table 4. Reoperation for postoperative bleeding was performed in two patients in both HES groups. In both of the reoperated patients in the HES 120 group, an obvious surgical cause of bleeding was found. One had bleeding from a side branch of the radial artery graft, and the other had bleeding from the venous graft anastomosis. No distinct bleeding site could be identified in either of the reoperated patients in the HES 400 group. In the displayed figures of postoperative blood and hemoglobin loss, the data for reoperated patients are excluded (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Postoperative Fluid Balance
 
Postoperative blood loss through the chest tubes had increased in both HES groups, but the difference in blood loss was significant only between the ALB and HES 400 groups at 4 h after CPB. There was no difference in postoperative hemoglobin loss among the groups, nor did the number of patients requiring blood product transfusions differ among the groups. Also, there were no differences in the number of postoperative crystalloid and ALB infusions or the amount of urine output (Table 4).

In the simple regression analysis, TEG®:MA, TEG®:G, and TEG®:{alpha}-angle were associated with blood loss at 4 h (R2 = 0.18, 0.20, and 0.14; P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P < 0.05, respectively) when the values measured at 0.5 and 2 h after CPB from all groups were pooled. The association between the changes in vWF concentration from the prebypass value and blood loss at 4 h was negative (R2 = 0.13; P < 0.05). The multiple regression analysis included 15 independent variables pooled from the 3 groups: coagulation FVIII:C, vWF, TEG® variables ({alpha}-angle, MA, and G) before and CPB, and their changes from prebypass values. In the stepwise procedure, three factors (baseline G, change in vWF, and change in {alpha}-angle) showed best negative linear association with the blood loss at 4 h (R2 value of the model).

The clinical outcomes are shown in Table 5. One patient in the ALB group and three patients in the HES 120 group had a new Q wave in the postoperative ECG. The CK-MB fraction was increased (more than 70 ng/mL) in 3 patients each in the ALB group and the HES 120 group and in one patient in the HES 400 group. There were no differences in the length of stay in the ICU or in the hospital among the groups. None of the patients had a stroke or died.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Clinical Outcomes
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our findings demonstrate that HES solutions, when used as the main component of the CPB prime, impair hemostasis after cardiac surgery. Both HES solutions (HES 120 and HES 400) induced a hypocoagulable state, as shown by the decreased {alpha}-angle, MA, and G in the TEG® tracing, indicating the formation of a less stable thrombus than with the use of ALB. Use of HES solutions also increased postoperative blood loss, albeit significantly only in the HES 400 group. The finding of a linear correlation between the pooled values of TEG® variables and postoperative blood loss supported the hypothesis that the increased bleeding was, at least in part, due to less stable thrombus formation.

The tendency to increased bleeding after cardiac surgery continues to be a problem. The bleeding is generally related to a combination of several CPB-induced alterations in the hemostatic system. In addition to the significant hemodilution that occurs with CPB, there is excessive activation of the blood coagulation system and fibrinolysis because of interaction of blood with the nonendothelial CPB surfaces (9). This study shows that the choice of the priming solution for the CPB circuit can further affect the hemostatic state.

The priming solutions used for the CPB circuit may vary widely among institutions. Colloidal solutions, including human ALB and HES, are used in an attempt to reduce fluid retention after CPB. ALB priming may be chosen because the adverse hemostatic effects of ALB seem to be limited to hemodilution (5,10). There is also an assumption that ALB may form an almost nonthrombogenic surface layer in the CPB circuit (2).

HES solutions may also impair hemostasis by mechanisms other than hemodilution. Through their coating effect, large molecules interfere with the function of the vWF and, hence, with FVIII. They also interfere with fibrin formation and, in addition, perhaps with platelet function (3,11–15). Thus, the resulting thrombus may be less stable and thereby more susceptible to lysis (3,5,16–19).

It has been speculated that the MW of HES solutions is an important factor in determining their effects on blood coagulation. Some investigations have suggested that low-MW HES solutions (120,000–300,000 daltons) may have less of an effect on coagulation than solutions with a higher MW (350,000–450,000 daltons) (5,6,11,15,20). We observed no difference between the two HES solutions in any of the numerous hemostatic indicators measured from blood and plasma.

Although it has been reported that infusion of HES just after weaning from CPB impairs surgical hemostasis to a clinically important degree (4), definitive evidence of increased postoperative bleeding with HES as a main component of priming solution is lacking. In previous studies (2,21–23), priming with either low- or high-MW HES was not associated with increased postoperative bleeding. This may have been due to the inadequate power of the studies to evaluate the problem. Although this trial was not designed to find a significant increase in postoperative blood loss, we found that CPB priming with HES solutions was associated with increased postoperative chest tube drainage—significantly so with high-MW HES. The finding is in agreement with our previous study that the use of HES in the CPB priming was associated with a tendency to increased postoperative bleeding (3). In the present study, regression analyses showed that increased postoperative bleeding was associated with formation of a less stable thrombus. The pooled values of the TEG® variables measuring clot firmness (MA, G, and {alpha}-angle) showed a linear association with blood loss at four hours after operation.

The impairment of hemostasis caused by large doses of HES solutions is usually associated with a decrease in the activity of coagulation FVIII moieties, i.e., FVIII procoagulant activity, vWF antigen, and FVIII-related ristocetin cofactor (3,6,14). In this study, the decrease of FVIII:C and vWF were not observed with the use of HES solutions, which is in disagreement with our previous similar study (3). The discrepancy in the results may be explained by different study designs, i.e., different control priming solutions (ALB versus acetated Ringer’s solution) and different time points of blood samples for laboratory tests (0.5 and 2 hours versus 1 and 3 hours after CPB). In our previous study, there also appeared to be a more pronounced hemodilution after the CPB, which probably contributed to a more marked decrease in the activity of coagulation FVIII moieties. A limitation of our study is that we did not assess the functional defect in vWF by measuring ristocetin cofactor activity. However, the platelet adhesion to the glass beads measured in this trial is an indicator of interaction between vWF and platelets. On the basis of this analysis, it can be concluded that neither of the HES solutions affected this aspect of platelet function. Although there were no differences among the study groups in vWF concentrations, the changes in vWF concentrations were linearly associated with blood loss when the values from all the groups were pooled.

By means of the TEG® analysis, we were able to demonstrate that the speed at which solid clot forms ({alpha}-angle) and the strength of the fibrin clot (MA and G) were decreased by HES solutions. TEG® tracings are very sensitive to even minor changes in blood coagulation, and an abnormal TEG® profile has been associated with bleeding episodes more often than abnormalities in more conventional coagulation tests (24,25). Our observation of the defect in fibrin clot formation is in agreement with other observations that hypocoagulation associated with HES solutions is caused by less stable thrombus formation rather than by a decreased amount of coagulation factors (3,5,17–20). The association of TEG® variables with blood loss in our patients further supports the utility of TEG® as a rapid point-of-care method to evaluate whole-blood clotting in the operating room (24).

In addition to the formation of solid clot, the change of {alpha}-angle in the TEG® tracing was also associated with platelet function. There are conflicting reports of effects of HES solutions as CPB primes on platelet function. Boldt et al. (2) reported that HES solutions decrease platelet aggregation induced by ADP. In contrast, it has been reported that the use of different HES solutions has no additive effect on the platelet defect caused by CPB (21). In agreement with these findings, we did not observe any changes that indicated platelet dysfunction other than the decreased {alpha}-angle in the TEG® tracing.

In conclusion, HES solutions as a main component of CPB prime do not appear to cause critical changes in individual coagulation factors or in platelet count and function. However, in the presence of HES solutions, the resulting thrombus is less stable, and this may cause cardiac surgical patients to be more prone to bleeding induced by shear forces or fibrinolysis after CPB.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tølløfsrud S, Svennevig JL, Breivik H, et al. Fluid balance and pulmonary functions during and after coronary artery surgery: Ringer’s acetate compared with dextran, polygeline, or albumin. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 671–7.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Boldt J, Zickmann B, Ballesteros BM, et al. Influence of five different priming solutions on platelet function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 219–25.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Kuitunen A, Hynynen M, Salmenperä M, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch as a prime for cardiopulmonary bypass: effects of two different solutions on haemostasis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993; 37: 652–8.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Cope JT, Banks D, Mauney MC, et al. Intraoperative hetastarch infusion impairs hemostasis after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 78–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Niemi TT, Kuitunen AH. Hydroxyethyl starch impairs in vitro coagulation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 1104–9.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Strauss RG. Volume replacement and coagulation: a comparative review. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1988; 2: 24–32.
  7. Konrad CJ, Markl TJ, Schuepfer GK, et al. In vitro effects of different medium molecular hydroxyethyl starch solutions and lactated Ringer’s solution on coagulation using SONOCLOT. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 274–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Langeron O, Doelberg M, Ang E-T, et al. Voluven®, a lower substituted novel hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4), causes fewer effects on coagulation in major orthopedic surgery than HES 200/0.5. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 855–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kuitunen AH, Heikkilä LJ, Salmenperä MT. Cardiopulmonary bypass with heparin-coated circuits and reduced systemic anticoagulation. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 438–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. McCammon AT, Wright JP, Figueroa M, Nielsen VC. Hemodilution with albumin, but not Hextend®, results in hypercoagulability assessed by Thromboelastography® in rabbits: role of heparin-dependent serpins and factor VIII complex. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 844–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Treib J, Haass A, Pindur G. Coagulation disorders caused by hydroxyethyl starch. Thromb Haemost 1997; 78: 974–83.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Blaicher AM, Reiter WJ, Blaicher W, et al. The effect of hydroxyethyl starch on platelet aggregation in vitro. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 1318–21.[Abstract]
  13. Franz A, Bräunlich P, Gamsjäger T, et al. The effects of hydroxyethyl starches of varying molecular weights on platelet function. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1402–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Huraux C, Ankri A, Eyraud D, et al. Hemostatic changes in patients receiving hydroxyethyl starch: the influence of ABO blood group. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1396–401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Strauss RG, Pennell BJ, Stump DC. A randomized, blinded trial comparing the hemostatic effects of pentastarch versus hetastarch. Transfusion 2002; 42: 27–36.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Ruttman TG, James MFM, Aronson I. In vivo investigation into the effects of haemodilution with hydroxyethyl starch (200/0.5) and normal saline on coagulation. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 612–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jamnicki M, Zollinger A, Seifert B, et al. Compromised blood coagulation: an in vitro comparison of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 using thromboelastography. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 989–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Entholzner EK, Mielke LL, Calatzis AN, et al. Coagulation effects of a recently developed hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) compared to hydroxyethyl starches with higher molecular weight. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 1116–21.[ISI][Medline]
  19. Innerhofer P, Fries D, Margreiter J, et al. The effects of perioperatively administered colloids and crystalloids on primary platelet-mediated hemostasis and clot formation. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 858–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Jamnicki M, Bombeli T, Seifert B, et al. Low- and medium-molecular-weight hydroxyethyl starches: comparison of their effect on blood coagulation. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 1231–7.[ISI][Medline]
  21. London MJ, Franks M, Verrier ED, et al. The safety and efficacy of ten percent pentastarch as a cardiopulmonary bypass priming solution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104: 284–96.[Abstract]
  22. Tigchelaar I, Gallandat Huet RCG, Korsten J, et al. Hemostatic effects of three colloid plasma substitutes for priming solution in cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 11: 626–32.[Abstract]
  23. Canver C, Nichols RD. Use of intraoperative hetastarch priming during coronary bypass. Chest 2000; 118: 1616–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Tuman KJ, Speiss BD, McCarthy RJ, et al. Effects of progressive blood loss on coagulation as measured by thromboelastography. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 856–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Ereth MH, Nuttall GA, Klindworth JT, et al. Does the platelet-activated clotting test (HemoSTATUS) predict blood loss and platelet dysfunction associated with cardiopulmonary bypass? Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 259–64.[Abstract]
Accepted for publication August 21, 2003.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuitunen, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Salmenperä, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuitunen, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Salmenperä, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Blood
Right arrow Heart
Right arrow Resuscitation


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press