JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirkeby-Garstad, I.
Right arrow Articles by Karevold, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirkeby-Garstad, I.
Right arrow Articles by Karevold, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Monitoring (Cardiac)

Anesth Analg 2004;98:311-317
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000096194.10459.7E


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Marked Mixed Venous Desaturation During Early Mobilization After Aortic Valve Surgery

Idar Kirkeby-Garstad, MD*, Olav F. M. Sellevold, MD PhD*, Roar Stenseth, MD PhD*, Eirik Skogvoll, MD PhD{ddagger}, and Asbjørn Karevold, MD{dagger}

*Section of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and the {dagger}Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Elisabeth Heart Center, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway, and the {ddagger}Unit for Applied Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Idar Kirkeby-Garstad, MD, Section of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, St. Elisabeth Heart Centre, Trondheim University Hospital, Hans Nissens gt 3 N 7018 Trondheim, Norway. Address email to Idar.Kirkeby-Garstad{at}medisin.ntnu.no


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We investigated the physiological reaction to mobilization the first and second day after aortic valve replacement in an open, prospective study. Hemodynamic and oxygenation variables were recorded in 15 patients using a pulmonary artery oximetry catheter and bench oximetry. Serious intraoperative events occurred in 3 patients, but all patients began mobilization on the first postoperative day and mobilization was accomplished without clinical problems. Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) at rest was 58.0 ± 7.7% (mean ± SD) on the first postoperative day and 58.0 ± 6.2% on the second day (NS). During mobilization, oxygen consumption increased by 64 ± 41% and 58 ± 33% on the first and second days (P < 0.01; NS between days). No compensatory increase in cardiac index and oxygen delivery was seen. Oxygen extraction increased, resulting in SvO2 values during exercise of 35.7 ± 6.8% on the first day and 36.7 ± 7.7% on the second day (P < 0.01; NS between days), whereas mixed venous oxygen partial pressure was 3.0 ± 0.4 kPa on both days. The lowest recorded value for SvO2 was 10%. The marked and consistent mixed venous desaturation during early mobilization has not been described before and the clinical consequences and underlying mechanism require further investigation.

IMPLICATIONS: During early mobilization after aortic valve replacement, a marked and consistent reduction in mixed venous oxygen saturation to 35% and mixed venous oxygen partial pressure to 3 kPa was observed.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As part of our fast-track cardiac surgery program, patients are mobilized on the first morning after surgery regardless of age and preoperative condition. Our experience is that early mobilization promotes patient well being and is followed by a rapid and uncomplicated recovery. During mobilization, however, we incidentally observed reductions in mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) to values less than 40% in aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients who were monitored with reflectance oximetry pulmonary artery catheters (PAC). It has been suggested that SvO2 values below 40% indicate tissue hypoxia (1) and that postoperative SvO2 values in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients less than 55% are associated with an increased incidence of complication (2). A stable SvO2 during mobilization is dependent on an increase in cardiac output (CO). Myocardial hypertrophy predisposes for postoperative cardiac dysfunction, which may hamper cardiac compensation (3). A prospective, observational study was designed to test the hypothesis that an increase in oxygen extraction (i.e., reduction in SvO2) is the main compensatory mechanism during early postoperative mobilization in AVR patients. Data were obtained on the first and second postoperative days to test for changes in the physiological response over time.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The Regional Board of Ethics in Medical Research approved the study protocol. Inclusion criteria were planned AVR with or without concomitant CABG, written informed consent, and ability to move freely. Exclusion criteria were acute operation, serious preoperative renal failure, and New York Heart Association class IV. Patients enrolled, but clinically unsuited for mobilization on the first postoperative morning, would be excluded from the study analysis.

The patients followed our standard regimen. Medication except acetyl salicylic acid was continued up to surgery. Premedication was morphine 10 mg and scopolamine 0.4 mg IM. Anesthesia was induced with diazepam 50 µg/kg, thiopental 1–3 mg/kg, fentanyl 5–6 µg/kg, and pancuronium 100 µg/kg. Isoflurane was given for maintenance of anesthesia with supplements of fentanyl up to a total of 10 µg/kg, and midazolam 1–5 mg. Cold crystalloid cardioplegia was given using a modified St. Thomas solution (4). Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) was performed with a standard membrane oxygenator, alpha-stat blood gas control, and a pump flow of 1.5–2.0 L/m-2 at a venous temperature of 32°C. Mean arterial blood pressure during ECC was maintained between 40 and 60 mm Hg. The patients were tracheally extubated in the intensive care unit (ICU) when they were cooperative and with stable hemodynamic status, insignificant bleeding, and arterial oxygen saturation more than 95% at FIO2 <= 0.5. Morphine (in doses of 1–3 mg IV) as needed with paracetamol 4 g daily supplementation was given for postoperative pain relief. Preoperative medication, including ß-blocking drugs, was resumed on day 1.

A standardized 15–20 min mobilization procedure was performed on the morning of postoperative days 1 and 2 (hereafter: day 1, day 2), conducted by one of the authors (IKG or OFMS) with assistance of ICU nurses and a physiotherapist. Hemodynamic and oxygen measurements were obtained at the end of the following sequential steps:

T1: resting in bed.
T2: sitting on the bed with the feet on the floor for approximately 3 min.
T3: exercise, the patient stood up and "walked in place" for 3 min.
T4: sitting in the weighing chair for 3 min.
T5: exercise, the patient stood up "walked in place" for 3 min.
T6: 10 min after returning to bed.

Under stable conditions, both SvO2 and cardiac index (CI) fluctuate by approximately 10%. As a measure of variability, the standard deviation is roughly estimated as one-quarter of this range (5), i.e., approximately 2.5%. It would be of clinical interest to detect a 10% change in SvO2 or CI, equivalent to a standardized difference of the order of 3 to 4%. A paired Student’s t-test (each patient was his own control) with a power of 0.9 and two-sided {alpha} = 0.05 will require only 3 to 5 observations (5). Accommodating for some uncertainty and potentially improving precision, a total of 15 patients were included.

The oximetry catheter was calibrated in vitro before insertion using a standard procedure. Recalibration was performed in the morning of days 1 and 2 immediately before the mobilization sequence. The standard in vivo recalibration protocol was used with SvO2 and hemoglobin (Hgb) obtained from an ABL300 blood gas analyzer (Radiometer, Denmark) as reference. This one-point calibration is claimed by the manufacturer to yield a measurement accuracy of ±2% for a range of SvO2 from 30 to 100% (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Irvine, CA).

The pressure transducers were zeroed before each mobilization, and repositioned before each measurement, aligning the zero point to the fifth intercostal space in the mid-axillary line. The VigilanceTM system with continuous CO (CCO) measurements was used in 12 patients, and the ExplorerTM system was used in 3 patients (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Irvine, CA). Both systems use Baxter’s 2-Sat system displaying SvO2 continuously. If an acceptable Signal Quality Index (SQI) was obtained (SQI < 3), SvO2 was recorded directly, otherwise the catheter was repositioned.

The VigilanceTM CCO monitor measures changes in pulmonary artery temperature in response to variations in heat produced by a low-powered filament located in the right atrium and ventricle (6). CI was recorded from the system’s STAT mode updating every 30–60 s as the mean value of 3 stable measurements. When using the non-CCO catheters, the mean value of 3 stable readings from 10 mL saline injection at room temperature was recorded. During mobilization, the PAC pressure curve was continuously observed to ensure correct position of the catheter.

A printout of the measurements of CCO and SvO2 was obtained in each case. A standard three-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was continuously observed for ST deviations or arrhythmia. At time points T1, T5, and T6 (Fig. 1) arterial and mixed venous blood was drawn and analyzed with the ABL300 blood gas analyzer. Patients demanding pacemaker were managed with ventricular pacing, and the pacemaker frequency was kept constant during mobilization.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A trend trace showing SvO2 and continuous cardiac output (CCO) over time during mobilization of patient number 4 (body surface area = 1.44 m2) on day 1 after aortic valve replacement. Actual time in minutes on the x-axis plotted against SvO2 and CCO. Patient activity indicated at the top. Measurement time points T1–T6 are shown in the lower part of the panel.

 
The oxygen consumption index was calculated for T1, T5, and T6 according to the formula:


using oxygen partial pressure (kPa) and saturation from the blood gas samples.

The results are presented as median, mean with 95% confidence interval (CI), mean ± 1 SD, or range, as appropriate. Analysis of variance for repeated measurements was used to assess changes during mobilization. Pairwise Student’s t-tests were done for post hoc analyses, with Bonferroni correction according to the number of comparisons done. These analyses were supplemented with the nonparametric Friedman’s test and Wilcoxon’s signed rank test, respectively. Linear regression with backward selection (P to remove at least 0.10) was performed to identify possible predictor variables for mean SvO2 at maximum exercise as the outcome variable.

A P value <0.05 was considered significant. SPSS version 11 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
No patient was excluded from the study. Demographic data are given in Table 1. The aortic mean gradient was 57 ± 26 mm Hg. All patients except patient 1 (who had a major sequela from myocardial infarction) had marked left ventricular hypertrophy verified by echocardiography. Six mechanical and 9 biological valves were implanted. The ECC time was 124 ± 24 min, and aorta occlusion time was 89 ± 18 min. Median postoperative intubation time was 310 min (range, 115–720 min). Median postoperative bleeding was 580 mL (range, 290–2520 mL), and median amount of shed blood that was retransfused was 660 mL (range, 0–1030 mL). Seven patients received blood transfusions during the first 24 h (range, 1–11 U). Median cumulative fluid balance (defined as volumes given - registered volume loss) was 3455 mL (range, 2105–7995 mL) on day 1 and 3130 mL (range, 2170–7730 mL) on day 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. SvO2 in Individual Patients During Mobilization
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Continues
 
Complications occurred in 3 patients before mobilization: patient number 2 experienced an intraoperative myocardial infarction defined by enzyme markers (aspartate-amino-transferase, 259 U/L; alanine-amino- transferase, 49 U/L) and ECG changes (substantial R-wave reduction in V4–V6; from 2.7 to 0.7 mV in lead V5). Patient number 5 had accidental perforation of the right ventricle during surgery with massive hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. Patient number 11 had excessive bleeding the first few hours after surgery and was successfully reoperated. As all three patients were clinically stable on the morning of day 1, they were mobilized according to protocol.

The median time from ICU admission to mobilization on day 1 was 20.8 h (range, 18.5–22.3 h) and 44.5 h (range, 42.5–46 h) on day 2. The median amount of morphine given IV was 0.15 mg/kg (range, 0.08–0.30 mg/kg) on day 1 and 0.13 mg/kg (range, 0.03–0.39 mg/kg) on day 2. At the time of mobilization all patients had good pain relief, were alert, generally content, and ready to participate. They also felt comfortable during the procedure; two were dizzy when standing up, but recovered without medication. Ischemic events were not detected, nor was any new arrhythmia. During the second postoperative night two PACs were removed for patient comfort. Between-days comparison is thus based on 13 patients.

A typical recording from the VigilanceTM monitor during mobilization is shown in Figure 1. A marked reduction in SvO2 was seen when the patient was sitting up, followed by progressive decrease in SvO2 as long as the patient was walking in place (T3 and T5). Relaxing in a chair at T4 led to a temporary increase in SvO2, and the SvO2 reached premobilization levels quickly after the patient returned to bed. This train of events produced a characteristic and consistent W pattern in every patient (Fig. 2).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) for all patients during mobilization the first and second morning after aortic valve replacement. Median values for SvO2 are given in the lower part of the figure. Individual values are plotted against measurement time points during mobilization on the x-axis.

 
All SvO2 measurements during mobilization (time points T2, T3, T4, and T5) differed significantly from the premobilization measurement (T1) (P < 0.001). In contrast, CI did not change during mobilization. We did not observe any difference in SvO2 or CI between day 1 and day 2 (Fig. 2, Table 2). Summary measures of SvO2 were calculated in each patient as their mean values at rest and at maximum exercise, and the amount of desaturation ({Delta}SvO2) was calculated as the difference between mean SvO2 values at rest and during exercise. These measures are presented in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Hemodynamic and Oxygenation Variables During Mobilization
 
The following variables were considered as possible predictors for the mean value of SvO2 obtained at maximum exercise (Table 1 ): age, sex, previous myocardial infarction, type of operation (AVR alone or in combination with CABG), use of ß-blockers, rhythm other than sinus, and Hgb level at the day of mobilization. Almost identical models were identified for day 1 and 2, with r2 = 0.44 and 0.71 respectively. Use of ß-blockers reduced SvO2 on both days (coefficient day 1: -9.1, P = 0.014; day 2: -6.9, P = 0.043) whereas an increase in Hgb of 1 g/dL increased SvO2 (coefficient day 1: 6.2, P = 0.054; day 2: 7.9, P = 0.008). On day 2 patients with combined AVR + CABG had reduced SvO2 (coefficient -5.4, P = 0.098) compared with patients operated with AVR only.

The oxygen consumption during exercise increased by 64% ± 41% and 58% ± 33% on days 1 and 2, respectively. No change in mean arterial blood pressure, PAC wedge pressure, or oxygen delivery index was seen during mobilization or between day 1 and day 2. Hemodynamic and oxygen transport variables are given in Table 2. During mobilization arterial PCO2 was significantly reduced but still within normal limits, and no significant change occurred in pH or base excess. Ventilation was thus slightly increased, but there was no metabolic acidosis.

Patient number 4, who initially recovered well, developed multiple organ failure after 1 wk and died 4 wk after the operation. All other patients were alive after 1 mo, giving 30-day mortality comparable to the average 3.6% for AVR patients at our institution (unpublished data). No other case of major organ failure or prolonged hospital stay was noted.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study is the first to demonstrate that early postoperative mobilization of AVR patients consistently leads to a marked—but temporary—decrease in SvO2 lasting throughout the mobilization procedure. The increase in oxygen consumption induced by mobilization exercise was compensated by increased oxygen extraction. No compensatory increase in CO and oxygen delivery was seen.

The SvO2 results from mixing of desaturated blood from all organs. Different organs have different venous oxygen content. A change in the distribution of blood and magnitude of extraction may change SvO2. The SvO2 reflects the overall balance between oxygen delivery and consumption and varies in healthy subjects from approximately 70% at rest to <20% during maximal exercise (7).

In this group of patients with AVR, low resting SvO2 values and considerable variations between patients were found during mobilization (Fig. 2, Table 1). Three factors were found to influence the SvO2 during exercise, the Hgb level, the use of ß-blockers, and the operation type. Low Hgb and ß-blockers reduced oxygen delivery by reducing arterial oxygen content and CO, respectively. The effect of operation type may indicate a slower recovery in patients with combined procedures than for those subjected to AVR alone. Our results suggest that higher postoperative levels of Hgb as well as inotropic support may be possible counter-measures for low SvO2 values. Svedjeholm et al. (2) demonstrated that low SvO2 values at patient arrival in the ICU negatively affected outcome. The low SvO2 values may indicate tissue hypoxia (1). Although of interest, these results may not be relevant as regards the short time desaturation during mobilization. The clinical impression was that mobilization was well tolerated by our patients. Further, we found no association between the degree of desaturation and outcome. We therefore continue to mobilize patients early after cardiac valve surgery.

It has been questioned whether reflectance oximetry catheters are accurate and reliable at values less than 50% (8). In an earlier study (9), we analyzed 352 paired reflectance oximetry catheter and bench hemoximetry measurements of SvO2 during mobilization (the present patient sample is included). A good overall agreement between the methods was documented. Only a small systematic bias was identified; the reflectance oximetry catheter underestimated bench hemoximetry SvO2 by 1.5% for each 10% decrease in SvO2 less than 65%. Simultaneous observations of low PvO2 values confirm the desaturation.

It has further been suggested that the CCO system is less accurate during abrupt changes in CO because of delayed time response (7). However, Singh et al. (10) found good correlation between CCO measurements (both in the trend and STAT mode) and intermittent measurements of CO during acute hemodynamic changes in off-pump CABG patients. Lazor et al. (11) studied the response to increasing the pacemaker rates and found delayed response time for both CCO modes compared with SvO2; the STAT mode updated the values faster than the trend mode. In our study, any bias attributable to delayed response time of the CCO method seems unlikely as only small alterations in CO were observed during the entire mobilization sequence.

In CABG patients Horiuchi et al. (12) found that turning patients to the lateral position in the early postoperative period increased CO from 7 L/min to more than 9 L/min with only a small decrease in SvO2 of approximately 4%. Viale et al. (1) found that increased oxygen consumption—associated with shivering—during the first 2 hours after CABG was compensated for by an increase in CI from 3.1 to 4.6 L · min-1 · m-2 and a decrease in SvO2 from 65.5% to 52.5%. In contrast to our results, the increased oxygen consumption was compensated for mainly through an increase in CO. An increment in oxygen consumption may be compensated for differently depending on its size (13), but oxygen consumption during rest and stress in these studies was of the same magnitude as in our patients. The above-mentioned patients were, however, sedated, mechanically ventilated, and resting in bed, whereas we studied patients who were standing up and adjusting to the standing posture.

Compiled physiological data from several studies on normal subjects indicate that standing up reduces the central venous pressure (CVP). Stroke volume is also reduced; this is presumably attributable to a Starling mechanism. Despite an increase in heart rate, CO is reduced (14). Gentle contractions in the calf muscles restore venous return to the heart, normalizing CVP and CO (14). Because activity increases oxygen consumption, these changes presumably cause a decrease in SvO2, but quantitative data are lacking. Left ventricular hypertrophy increases the AVR patients’ sensitivity to preload reductions. This may have contributed to the lack of increase in CO and the decrease in SvO2 in our patients when standing up. Increased postoperative oxygen consumption (15) and reduced arterial oxygen content attributable to the low Hgb may further have reduced SvO2.

Anesthesia, cardioplegic arrest, and cardiac manipulations may have induced cardiac dysfunction. Previous studies on CABG patients resting in bed concluded that cardiac dysfunction after surgery is normalized within the first postoperative morning (16,17). The results from studies performed at rest may, however, not be applicable whereas we tested the heart under stress, which may be a better way to monitor the patients’ adaptation to the postoperative situation. Wranne et al. (18) suggested that right ventricular dysfunction might last up to 6 months after cardiac surgery. We found no improvement from day 1 to day 2, which may support a prolonged cardiac dysfunction after AVR surgery.

This study has established that early mobilization of AVR patients consistently induces a reduction in SvO2 to values clinically used as markers of insufficient circulation and adverse patient outcome (1,2). No cardiac compensation and no improvement from day 1 to day 2 were observed. The small number of patients, the lack of data from preoperative mobilization in the study group, and the lack of a control group of subjects with normal cardiac function limit the interpretation of underlying mechanisms and possible clinical implications. Judged from the oxygen consumption, early mobilization represents a moderate workload. Nevertheless, the surprisingly low SvO2 values may indicate that some of our patients were pushed almost to the maximum of their actual working capacity. The clinical implications are unclear and the relation to patient outcome awaits further investigation.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to physiotherapist Aud Karin Berg and the ICU nursing staff for enthusiastic help during mobilizations. Cardiologist Arve Tromsdal reviewed the electro- and the echocardiograms.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Viale JP, Annat G, Lehot JJ, et al. Relationship between oxygen uptake and mixed venous oxygen saturation in the immediate postoperative period. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 278–83.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Svedjeholm R, Håkanson E, Szabo Z. Routine SvO2 measurement after CABG surgery with a surgically introduced pulmonary artery catheter. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16: 450–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Skarvan K, Zuber M, Seeberger M, Stulz P. Immediate effects of aortic valve replacement on left ventricular function and its determinants. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16: 659–68.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Sellevold OF, Berg EM, Levang OW. Procaine is effective for minimizing postischemic ventricular fibrillation in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1995; 8: 932–8.
  5. Machin D, Campbell MJ, Fayers PM, Pinol APY. Sample size tables for clinical studies. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1997.
  6. Siegel LC, Hennessy MM, Pearl RG. Delayed time response of the continuous cardiac output pulmonary artery catheter. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1173–7.[Abstract]
  7. Sutton JR, Reeves JT, Wagner PD, et al. Operation Everest II: oxygen transport during exercise at extreme simulated altitude. J Appl Physiol 1988; 64: 1309–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fletcher EC, Miller T, Thornby JI. Accuracy of fiberoptic central venous saturation catheter below 50%. J Appl Physiol 1988; 64: 2220–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kirkeby-Garstad I, Skogvoll E, Sellevold OFM. Mixed venous oxygen saturation during mobilization after cardiac surgery: are reflectance oximetry catheters reliable? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 1103–8.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Singh A, Juneja R, Metha Y, Trehan N. Comparison of continuous, stat and intermittent cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 186–90.[ISI][Medline]
  11. Lazor MA, Pierce ET, Stanley GD, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy and response time of STAT-mode continuous cardiac output. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997; 11: 432–6.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Horiuchi K, Jordan D, Cohen D, et al. Insights into the increased oxygen demand during chest physiotherapy. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1347–51.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Weissman C, Kemper M. The oxygen uptake—oxygen delivery relationship during ICU interventions. Chest 1991; 99: 430–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rowell LB. Human cardiovascular control. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  15. Tulla H, Takala J, Alhava E, et al. Hypermetabolism after coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101: 598–600.[Abstract]
  16. Mangano DT. Biventricular function after myocardial revascularization in humans: deterioration and recovery patterns during the first 24 hours. Anesthesiology 1985; 62: 571–7.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Breisblatt WM, Stein KL, Wolfe CJ, et al. Acute myocardial dysfunction and recovery: a common occurrence after coronary bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 1261–9.[Abstract]
  18. Wranne B, Pinto FJ, Hammarstrom E, et al. Abnormal right heart filling after cardiac surgery: time course and mechanisms. Br Heart J 1991; 66: 435–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Accepted for publication August 27, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
I. Kirkeby-Garstad, U. Wisloff, E. Skogvoll, T. Stolen, A.-E. Tjonna, R. Stenseth, and O. F. Sellevold
The marked reduction in mixed venous oxygen saturation during early mobilization after cardiac surgery: the effect of posture or exercise?
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1609 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirkeby-Garstad, I.
Right arrow Articles by Karevold, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirkeby-Garstad, I.
Right arrow Articles by Karevold, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Monitoring (Cardiac)


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press