JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kapural, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mekhail, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kapural, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mekhail, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Complications
Right arrow Pain

Anesth Analg 2004;98:745-746
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000102674.41527.1E


PAIN MEDICINE

Decreased Insulin Requirements with Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with Diabetes

Leonardo Kapural, MD PhD, Salim M. Hayek, MD PhD, Michael Stanton-Hicks, MB BS, and Nagy Mekhail, MD PhD

Department of Pain Management, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Leonardo Kapural, MD, PhD, Pain Management Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. Desk C25, Cleveland, OH 44195. Address e-mail to Kapural{at}ccf.org


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
We describe a case of type-2 diabetes mellitus with significant improvement in blood glucose control and significant decrease in insulin requirements after initiation of spinal cord stimulation. We believe that spinal cord stimulation may provide additional beneficial effects in patients with chronic pain and diabetes.

IMPLICATIONS: Spinal cord stimulation when used for control of chronic pain in diabetics may provide additional benefits of improving glycemic control and insulin requirements.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
Sympathetic stimulation increases circulating glucose levels and inhibits insulin release from the pancreatic ß-cells. That may contribute to stress-related hyperglycemia. Acute or chronic uncontrolled pain is a potent stress-inducing factor. It was described that unopposed sympathetic activity worsens blood sugar levels in diabetic mice (1).

Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord has proven beneficial for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus in people with spinal cord injury. In those patients, glucose use and insulin sensitivity improved significantly (2).

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) through multiple mechanisms produces pain relief. We describe an insulin-dependent diabetic female patient who had a SCS implant to control her chronic pain state secondary to complex regional pain syndrome Type 1. Her insulin requirements halved after initiation of SCS.


    Case Report
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
A 62-yr-old woman initially presented 1 yr ago for the evaluation of her left lower extremity pain. The pain was located on the medial aspect of the left knee and was associated with intermittent swelling and discoloration in the same area. Pain was described as burning and squeezing. These symptoms started after a left knee arthroscopy was performed 6 mo before her visit to our clinic. Other physical findings included severe allodynia, hyperalgesia, edema, and skin discoloration. Previous pain treatments included narcotic analgesics and physical therapy.

A review of her medical history revealed mild autonomic neuropathy related to her severe type-2 diabetes mellitus. She had an implanted insulin pump for improved control of her hyperglycemia (MiniMed 508; Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN).

After thermographic imaging of both lower extremities and diagnostic lumbar sympathetic block, the diagnosis of the complex regional pain syndrome Type 1 was confirmed, and therapy was initiated with a series of lumbar sympathetic blocks. We used a 0.375% bupivacaine total of 30 mL after the needle was positioned properly under fluoroscopy at the L3 level. She received several lumbar sympathetic blocks with the minimal prolongation of her pain-free time (approximately 2 wk with prolongation measured in hours to a few days). Her glucose levels ranged from 180 to 260 mg/dL with the average insulin requirements of 124 U/d during that time period, and she had periods of total pain relief during that time. Because of the short-lived effect of the lumbar sympathetic blocks, SCS was proposed as one of the options to control her neuropathic pain. A 1-wk SCS trial was then completed and resulted in significant pain relief (1–2 of 10 visual analog scale). SCS system implant followed. She received an Itrel 3 generator with a Quad lead (Medtronic Inc) whose tip was placed under fluoroscopy over the top of the T9 vertebral body. This resulted in sustained pain relief, better control of her blood glucose levels, and a dramatic decrease in her insulin requirements (Fig. 1). Her glucose levels were consistently decreased with <50% of insulin daily usage via the insulin pump. Her hemoglobin (Hb) A1c decreased from 10.1, 3 mo before the implant, to 6.4, 3 mo after the implant. She maintained similar glucose control after implant.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Graph represents periods of stable glucose control before and stable glucose control after spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implantation and use of the exogenous insulin via an insulin pump. Note a significant (approximately 50%) decrease in use of insulin via insulin pump after SCS implant and at the same time decreased blood glucose levels. Open circles ([squlo]) represent the average daily glucose levels in mg/dL, and full circles ([squlo]) represent total insulin delivery via insulin pump in units of humulin R.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
We describe a case of type-2 diabetes mellitus with significant improvement in blood glucose control and significant decrease in insulin requirements after initiation of SCS.

Pain decreases insulin sensitivity, and it seems that the mechanism involves non-oxidative glucose metabolism (3). The same study suggested counter regulatory hormonal response as the reason for improved glucose control after analgesia. Therefore, pain relief is important for reestablishment of normal glucose metabolism. However, this patient had significant periods of pain relief after lumbar sympathetic blocks but no significant decrease in insulin requirements.

Besides pain control, other factors may affect glucose metabolism. Stimulation of the autonomic nerves affects islet hormone secretion. Thus, insulin secretion is stimulated by parasympathetic nerves or their neurotransmitters and inhibited by sympathetic nerves or their neurotransmitters (4). An important mechanism of action of SCS is blockade of supraspinal and spinal sympathetic mechanisms. Those effects persist after transection of the dorsal roots and spinal cord section rostrally to the stimulating electrode (5).

SCS of the upper thoracic segments was shown to decrease sympathetic outflow from the stellate ganglion.1 SCS placement at T8-9 may provide some sympathetic blockade to upper abdominal viscera and pancreas. It may be that additional, likely rostral, modulation of the autonomic system in our case contributed to better control of the patient’s diabetes.

The effects of spinal cord stimulation on peripheral insulin sensitivity are unknown. Those effects of neurostimulation seem to be long-term and not just temporary phenomena caused by a decrease of pain-induced stress because HbA1c showed a significant decrease three months after the SCS implant.

Exercise induces expression of key regulatory proteins involved in glucose uptake and metabolism (6,7). Our patient had improved exercise tolerance after each of the sympathetic blocks as well.

There are some other effects of SCS that could play a role in maintenance of better glucose control in this patient. They are mediated by multiple mediators like calcitonin gene-related peptide (8) and neuronal release of nitric oxide (9). The pancreatic islets are richly innervated by sensory nerves, and calcitonin gene-related peptide is localized in those sensory nerves (4). Nitric oxide was more recently implicated as the important inducer of endogenous insulin production (10).

In summary, we found a dramatic decrease of insulin requirements with better glycemic control when SCS was used for chronic pain control in our patient.


    Footnotes
 
1 Fedoresak I. Peripheral vasodilatation after spinal cord stimulation. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress of Neuroscience, Montreal 1991, A324. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kvist-Reimer M, Sundler F, Ahren B. Effects of chemical sympathectomy by means of 6-hydroxydopamine on insulin secretion and islet morphology in alloxan-diabetic mice. Cell Tissue Res 2002; 307: 203–9.[Medline]
  2. Jeon JY, Weiss CB, Steadward RD, et al. Improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity after electrical stimulation-assisted cycling in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2002; 40: 110–7.[Medline]
  3. Greisen J, Juhl CB, Grofte T, et al. Acute pain induces insulin resistance in humans. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 578–84.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Ahren B. Autonomic regulation of islet hormone secretion-implications for health and disease. Diabetologia 2000; 43: 393–410.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Linderoth B, Gunasekera L, Meyerson B. Effects of sympathectomy on skin and muscle circulation during dorsal column stimulation: animal studies. Neurosurgery 1991; 29: 874–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Hjeltnes N, Galuska D, Bjornholm M, et al. Exercise-induced overexpression of key regulatory proteins involved in glucose uptake and metabolism in tetraplegic persons: molecular mechanism for improved glucose homeostasis. FASEB J 1998; 12: 1701–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Chilibeck PD, Bell G, Jeon J, et al. Functional electrical stimulation exercise increases GLUT-1 and GLUT-4 in paralyzed skeletal muscle. Metabolism 1999; 48: 1409–13.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Tanaka S, Barron KW, Chandler MJ, et al. Low intensity SCS may induce cutaneous vasodilatation via CGRP release. Brain Res 2001; 896: 183–7.[Medline]
  9. Croom JE, Foreman RD, Chandler MJ, Barron KW. Cutaneous vasodilation during dorsal column stimulation is mediated by dorsal roots and CGRP. Am J Physiol 1997; 272: H950–7.[Medline]
  10. Smukler SR, Tang L, Wheeler MB, Salapatek AM. Exogenous nitric oxide and endogenous glucose-stimulated beta-cell nitric oxide augment insulin release. Diabetes 2002; 51: 3450–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Accepted for publication October 2, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Ao, N. Toy, M. K. Song, V. L. W. Go, and H. Yang
Altered Glucose and Insulin Responses to Brain Medullary Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone (TRH)-Induced Autonomic Activation in Type 2 Diabetic Goto-Kakizaki Rats
Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5425 - 5432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kapural, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mekhail, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kapural, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mekhail, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Complications
Right arrow Pain


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press