JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayhew, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Muraika, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayhew, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Muraika, L. A.

Anesth Analg 2004;98:1814-1815
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000120094.36897.CE


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Continuous Monitoring of the End Tidal CO2 Ensures that the Endotracheal Tube Remains in Place During the Removal of the LMA

James F. Mayhew, MD, FAAP

Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AK

To the Editor:

I read with interest the report of Muraika et al. (1) on their technique for intubating the trachea of a child with a difficult airway through a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). I would like to call the writers’ attention to this author’s and others’ (2,3) reports of using an endotracheal tube one-half smaller as an extender for removing the LMA. We have described this technique and the advantage that nothing must be cut or modified, and that continuous monitoring of the end tidal carbon dioxide ensures that the endotracheal tube remains in place during the removal of the LMA.

References

  1. Muraika L, Heyman JS, Shevchenko Y. Fiberoptic tracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask airway in a child with Treacher Collins syndrome. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1298–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Nguyen NH, Morvant EM, Mayhew JF. Anesthetic management for patients with arthrogryposis, multiple congenita, and severe micrognathia: case reports. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 227–30.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Otawa S, Mayhew JF, Woodson L, Manning R, Peterson P. Fiberoptic intubation through a laryngeal mask airway in a child with Pierre-Robin syndrome. J Anesth 1999; 26: 221–2.

 

Response

Lisa A. Muraika, DO

St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA

In Response:

Variations of the technique Dr. Mayhew mentioned for removing an LMA while maintaining endotracheal tube position has been used with success. It seems that most authors either wedged two tubes of the same internal diameter together (1–3) or used the technique you described and inserted an ETT one half to one size smaller into the desired intubating tube (4). As you pointed out in your letter, our technique does involve the additional step of cutting the endotracheal tube connector. However, we feel not only does the use of the cut endotracheal tube connector make our arrangement unique, but it might also prove to be a more secure connection and prevent the endotracheal tube of smaller or similar diameter from slipping out of its mate.

References

  1. Reynolds PI, O’Kelly SW. Fiberoptic intubation and the laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 5.[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Theroux MC, Dettrick RG, Khine HH. Laryngeal mask and fiberoptic endoscopy in an infant with Schwartz-Jampel syndrome. Anesthesiology 1994; 82: 605.
  3. Johnson CM, Sims C. Awake fiberoptic intubation via a laryngeal mask in an infant with Goldenhar’s syndrome. Anesth Intensive Care 1994; 22: 194–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Chadd GD, Walford AJ, Crane DL. The 3.5/4.5 modification for fiberscope-guided tracheal intubation using the laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 307–8.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayhew, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Muraika, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayhew, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Muraika, L. A.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press