JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, B.
Right arrow Articles by Marty, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, B.
Right arrow Articles by Marty, J.

Anesth Analg 2004;99:624-625
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130911.23771.68


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Peripartum Management of a Suspected Spinal Hematoma After Epidural Puncture

Beny Charbit, MD, Emmanuel Samain, MD PhD, Pierre Albaladejo, MD PhD, Younes El Houari, MD, Frédérique Le Corre, MD, Aimée Redondo, MD PhD, Bruno Deval, MD, and Jean Marty, MD PhD

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department of Obstetric and Gynecology Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department of Neurosurgery Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpital Beaujon, University Xavier Bichat, Clichy, France

To the Editor:

We managed a case of suspected spinal hematoma (SH) after a failed attempt of epidural analgesia during labor.

A 32-year old multiparous woman was admitted at 38 weeks’ gestation for left iliac vein thrombosis and was treated with Enoxaparin 70 mg twice daily that was switched to continuous IV unfractionated heparin 5 days later (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]: 54 s [normal value < 40 s]). At the end of the 39th week, heparin was discontinued and labor was induced with oxytocin. Four hours after heparin discontinuation, aPTT was 31 s. After informed consent and at the patient request, epidural placement was attempted at the L3–4 interspace in the sitting position, 6 hours after heparin discontinuation. Direction of the needle was changed four times before epidural space could be located. A multihole flexible epidural catheter (18-gauge, no inside leader, Portex Ltd, Keene, U.S.) was introduced 4 cm cephalad in the epidural space. A frank blood tap was immediately observed in the catheter, which prompted both catheter and needle removal. The patient wished to rest for a moment, and no further attempt of epidural analgesia was done. One hour later, she complained for severe back pain located at the L3–4 interspace with bilateral and cephalic radiation, suggesting radicular back pain. Pain was constant, not altered by uterine contraction and clearly differentiated by the patient from uterine contraction. Pain was unchanged by vertebral palpation and no sensory or motor deficit was observed. No symptom of subarachnoid hemorrhage was found. Epidural hematoma was suspected. After a neurosurgeon’s advice was obtained, it was decided, in order to reduce the delay before spinal imaging and eventually surgery, to perform emergent C-section under general anesthesia after patient information and consent. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), done 4 h after back pain onset, ruled out SH. Backache decreased progressively and disappeared in 6 h. Neurological examination remained normal. Enoxaparin (70 mg twice daily) was reintroduced 18 h after the failed epidural. Postpartum period was uneventful with normal neurological status.

Confirmation of SH by specific imaging is an emergency, since neurological prognosis of SH depends on the delay between SH symptoms and decompressive laminectomy (1–3). Classical features of SH (i.e., backache, cauda equina syndrome) can be masked by neuraxial block and diagnosis is commonly suspected in face of unusual recovery from neuroaxial block. In our case, we had to manage a suspected SH very early during labor as epidural analgesia was abandoned. The benefit/risk ratio of three strategies were analyzed. Immediate MRI was considered, but was found not possible because of the problem to obtain several minutes of stillness in a laboring woman without analgesia. To expedite vaginal delivery and perform MRI just after was not considered appropriate, as the duration of labor is unpredictable, leading to an unacceptable delay in SH diagnosis. Furthermore, SH extension may be favored by both uterine contractions and pushing efforts that lead to epidural venous plexus congestion. The strategy we choose gives the advantage to reduce the delay before MRI to 4 h, and to limit the duration of uterine contractions and avoid pushing efforts, but was balanced with a fivefold increase in the perioperative risk of C-section under general anesthesia as compared with vaginal delivery (4). This case emphasizes the difficulty to analyze back pain during labor and the problem of early SH diagnosis on clinical symptoms only.

References

  1. Vandermeulen EP, Van Aken H, Vermylen J. Anticoagulants and spinal-epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 1165–77.[Free Full Text]
  2. Lawton MT, Porter RW, Heiserman JE, et al. Surgical management of spinal epidural hematoma: relationship between surgical timing and neurological outcome. J Neurosurg 1995; 83: 1–7.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Holtas S, Heiling M, Lonntoft M. Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma: findings at MR imaging and clinical correlation. Radiology 1996; 199: 409–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Jackson N, Paterson-Brown S. Physical sequelae of caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 15: 49–61.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, B.
Right arrow Articles by Marty, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, B.
Right arrow Articles by Marty, J.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press