JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gültekin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gültekin, S.

Anesth Analg 2004;99:630
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000131455.93074.8A


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Bilateral Brachial Plexus Block Versus Segmental Epidural Anesthesia

Süreyya Gültekin, MD

Department of Anesthesia, Ministry of Health, Menemen State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

To the Editor:

In the case report by Franco et al. (1) on bilateral brachial plexus block procedures, I believe that two points have not been considered:

a) Perhaps an injection with a 22-gauge needle without a local anesthetic infiltration into skin in a region where there is no guarantee of injecting the needle at the desired location with a single injection technique should not be made.

b) A concurrent injection of 53 mL 1% mepivacaine in a critical case like this is a dose that cannot be undermined.

A regional technique to be performed through the placement of an epidural catheter appropriate for the innervation of the regions to be operated in both of the upper extremities might have served as an alternative option to this approach. Thus, it would have been possible to avoid such large doses of local anesthesia to administer additional doses in case of a prolonged operation and to gain more effective postoperative analgesia. Lastly, the rate of a successful segmental epidural anesthesia is more frequent than a bilateral brachial plexus blocking technique.

Footnotes

Dr. Franco does not wish to respond.

Reference

  1. Franco CD, Salahuddin Z, Rafizad A. Bilateral brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 518–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gültekin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gültekin, S.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press